Form: Argument

  • Whenever someone criticizes any civilization look in to every other civilization

    Whenever someone criticizes any civilization look in to every other civilization’s equal crimes. Why is it that europeans speak truth before face, and no other people on earth does, and why is it that europeans invented rule of law, participatory government, (the republic), geometry, reason, empiricism, science, and why is it europeans maintained trifunctionalism: competing legal, martial, and religious elites, and never fell into the monopoly of stat(china) or religion (middle east) or the odd combination of religion and caste (India)?
    There are no horrors in Europe the equivalent of those in china, the middle east in particular. The question is why? Why would confessing be so important to europeans that they would use the torture devices they did while others just executed with abandon?

    Study germanic law

    Reply addressees: @CussedWench @BenZeisloft @saveusculture


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-10 19:12:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700950275270266880

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700933017420595200

  • My argument stands. Sentence density, length, proxy for IQ, verbal ability, educ

    My argument stands. Sentence density, length, proxy for IQ, verbal ability, education. See Flesch Kincaid. Neurologically refers to working memory preservation of continuous recursive disambiguation. Dumbing down of literacy to newspaper sixth great comprehension was a response to world war challenge of educating conscripts. Dumbing down of education a response to causes I won’t mention. I don’t participate in such devolution. Just because few people like me participate in public discourse given the frustration of it means only that we have largely eschewed the public as have most natural elites leaving you with credentialists and populists who find satisfaction in manipulating you.

    Not to dismiss your attempted intellectual honesty or the significant achievement of one of the more valuable degrees, but you are reaching outside your domains of competency when debating me … if debate can suffice for a label.

    Reply addressees: @elric9992000 @FromKulak


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-10 04:57:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700735282457260032

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700718242216423844

  • Christianity has the best ethical record which is rather easily demonstrated, an

    Christianity has the best ethical record which is rather easily demonstrated, and Christian behavior worldwide produces superior outcomes wherever it goes by preparing civilizations for middle class majority civ and rule of law. No religion can perfect mankind but so far Greco Roman logic, reason, philosophy and institutions combined with germanized Christianity despite its many failings have outpaced, out innovated, out produced, out prospered all civilizations combined with only the Japanese and South Koreans producing superior trust social harmony and good government. We can argue stoicism was better, and there is nothing good in Christianity that wasn’t already better in both stoicism, and in emerging Roman sun cults compatible with our origins and history. But stoicism is costly to teach and requires literacy. Christianity evolved from primitive older institutional religions, and was imposed upon our people to kill off western Roman aristocracy creating subservience to Byzantium and her profit from straddling both civilizations. Christianity made those same Greco Roman values available for the vast number of women slaves and peasants who were neither literate or educated in the context of the familiar superstition of their primitive understanding. The church figured most of this out by the time of Aquinas, and the scholastics expanded it, and we see it’s secularization in the laws of England and the natural law of Blackstone in his commentaries and Jefferson’s deism and Jeffersonian bible. Unfortunately the church upon encountering Darwin doubled down on superstition instead of claiming victory for their unification in natural law, and opened the door for a reformation of Judaism in the pseudoscience of the Marxist to woke cults, just as the failure of the stoicism to institutionalize Roman into institutional form opened the door for superstitious Christianity. Why? Because there will always be hucksters willing to spread comforting lies by which to manipulate the weak of mind unless honest men pay the price of defense by spreading the discipline of adapting to uncomfortable truths instead. We don’t invest in mindfulness by the stoic method, so we pay the price for a half educated people. And still we do better than all others despite the vulnerability to conquest Christianity teaches as universalism – and in particular it’s appeal to women for whom responsibility for scarcity is frightening and always evaded.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @CussedWench @BenZeisloft @saveusculture


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-10 02:52:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700703782332411904

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700688914980216880

  • I understand the moral intuition, to rebel against capitalism (rule of law) in f

    I understand the moral intuition, to rebel against capitalism (rule of law) in favor of socialism (rule by arbitrary human command) but I am, unlike you, too knowledgeable about physics, behavior, economics, and evolution to believe such an … immature … thing.

    The only reason you’re not as poor as an African tribesman or medieval starving peasant is the massive cooperation created by the predecessor to the internet: the combination of the rule of law, property rights, and financial instrumentation that uses infinitely cheap incentives rather than infinitely expensive dictates to organize human behavior for everyone’s good.

    Our country is in the toilet largely because well-meaning people like you believe an alternative is possible while still tolerating immigration, redistribution of reproduction from the upper and middle to the bottom, and the loss of our competitive advantage that provides you with the privilege of being naive and wrong without starving to death.

    Can we fix the financial system, the economy, and the polities of the government to limit the asymmetric rewards of modern scientific and technological reality? Of course. And it’s not even hard. But if people like you keep voting for government centralization, then it won’t happen and you’ll continue to get poorer.

    Reply addressees: @nickjamesthe1 @typesfast


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-08 17:33:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700200708610342912

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700183569908301988

  • I don’t like it, because I consider Ukraine my home, but Elon made the right dec

    I don’t like it, because I consider Ukraine my home, but Elon made the right decision to not participate in the war. The alternative position is to open up starlink everywhere and remain ambivalent. But this would invite starlink into being a target of military activity result…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-08 17:25:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700198712251683063

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699917639043404146

  • The goverment is the insurer of last resort – that’s what being a citizen means:

    The goverment is the insurer of last resort – that’s what being a citizen means: you’re insured – and the cost of rescuing him and putting others lives at stake isn’t covered in his attempt. Had he purchased an insurance plan to cover the cost of his failure, it would probably have been legal – at least to the degree that he did not endager shipping or shipping lanes, or violate the territory of whatever country he landed in. 😉

    Reply addressees: @saveusculture


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-07 16:39:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699824675050635264

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699817192165126229

  • “Well you know what they say, if you can’t explain it to a 6y/o etc..”– You mea

    –“Well you know what they say, if you can’t explain it to a 6y/o etc..”–

    You mean like mathematical analysis? category theory? The difficulty in our efforts to explain the quantum background? Regression potentials in neural networks? Database normalization and when to vary from it? Economic models of world financial flows? Civil and criminal procedure? Constitutional law? Performative vs ideal truth?

    I can explain all behavior at all scales. I can explain the foundations of nearly every field. But can you comprehend it despite that I’ve reduced it to a simple logic of first principles? Absolutely not. On average it takes a person with post grad capacity the same as a three year degree to understand my work. Why? It’s the unification of the sciences into a single universally commensurable value neutral paradigm, vocabular, logic and grammar making possible the capacity to determine testifiability (truth) of any such truth claims.

    That’s why it wasn’t done before. It was hard. We didn’t have much of the knowledge until the last decade or two, and we didn’t have immediate access to nearly all human knowledge until the last decade or two.

    And yes the only reason I’m even responding to you is so that I can save this post and re-use it every time someone says something so profoundly absurd as whether we can reduce the logic of a field so broad to something comprehensible by a six year old.

    Reply addressees: @RoseAndGarden


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-07 16:35:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699823702311829506

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699816590928236582

  • “Female attraction is not based on the criteria they list for partner selection.

    –“Female attraction is not based on the criteria they list for partner selection. They want these things from men they’re already attracted to. Which means the attraction comes first. With this understanding, your prime objective should be to become attractive: Fitness, dress, mission in life, charming conversation, game”– Orion Taraban. Psy D.

    These are all markers of fitness, just as the female form is a marker of fitness. Women are. Men do.

    For my part, It would never have occurred to me to do these things to get women instead of doing them to generate opportunities for biz.

    Your presentation gets you past first impressions, and your manners and words get you past the tests of potential value.

    That said except for the year after my divorce when I wasn’t interested, I was always in an LTR.

    Why? B/c I learned that women are mostly the same (really). That. you can love most of them if they’re feminine and not too crazy or dishonest. And it’s just a matter of whether they are attracted to you enough to adapt to you or not.

    So it’s not as much about being picky with who you choose as it is about whether who you choose will adapt to the world you want to make together.

    In other words try to invest in every relationship and see if you can make it work instead of waiting to figure out if it will work out without doing so.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-07 00:56:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699587310487040000

  • BTW: “Fallacy of appeal to credentialism.” IOW: Do you ask the doctor, a general

    BTW: “Fallacy of appeal to credentialism.”

    IOW: Do you ask the doctor, a general practitioner, about the experimental vaccine, or do you ask the scientists who constructed it, or do you ask the scientists who ran the field trials? Or do you ask one of the top three people in the field of virology (that’s all that ever exists in any field) for his opinion after reviewing all of the evidence?

    One of the lessons we learn in economics is that knowledge is not commutable. In other words there are probably two or three people who specialize in some economic niche who will give you the correct answer to a query, where nearly all of the remaining economists will give you the wrong answer. This is why X economists or X scientists agree is a nonsense argument.

    The difference is some economists know it. Some physicists know it. But not a lot of other people know it.

    Reply addressees: @scrumble_eggs @lauferlaw @elonmusk @alx


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 04:51:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698921843820843008

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698879138277597200

  • No, Anti-SLAPP laws are meant to prevent people from interfering with freedom of

    No, Anti-SLAPP laws are meant to prevent people from interfering with freedom of speech. Filing a lawsuit for conspiracy to destroy the value of a business by coercion of (threat to) its customers, in order to impose limits on freedom of speech is a rather simple argument. You do not realize that you are projecting your morals as law where such a law does not exist.

    Maybe you should leave grownup conversation to grownups.

    Here is the dummy version:
    –“Hate speech in the United States cannot be directly regulated by the government due to the fundamental right to freedom of speech protected by the Constitution. While “hate speech” is not a legal term in the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that most of what would qualify as hate speech in other western countries is legally protected speech under the First Amendment. In a Supreme Court case on the issue, Matal v. Tam (2017), the justices unanimously reaffirmed that there is effectively no “hate speech” exception to the free speech rights protected by the First Amendment and that the U.S. government may not discriminate against speech on the basis of the speaker’s viewpoint.”–

    Reply addressees: @LexerD1986 @lauferlaw @elonmusk @alx


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 04:23:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698914642095976448

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698913062319772074