Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • Trump could be, and is, a heroic figure willing to take on the corruption of the

    Trump could be, and is, a heroic figure willing to take on the corruption of the government and its capture by leftists and globalists against the interests of the people. Who, despite the very ease with which he could raise the largest army in the world from the american citizenry, has not done so out of dedication to tradition and history. Trump was right geostrategically, right on economics, right on borders, right on the problem of the ‘over production of elites’ (rent seekers), and right on the destruction of the working and middle classes by all of the above. What you and most others find offensive is that he understands the left’s use of the language of deception by suggestion so well that he used it against the enemy (including you), returning back what you give. And, like adolescent girls, you react accordingly. Because that’s what you are: infantilized: evasion of responsibility for the self, for the commons, and externalization of that responsibility to ‘better men’.
    I do not demand perfection of a leader like you would of mommy., I demand only that he drive toward beneficial ends, even if those ends are at the expense of the infantile. That is why you are no one, did nothing, and never will.

    Reply addressees: @BenToth580484 @TimothyDSnyder

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-31 22:17:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1686139119557087233

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1686096638979284993

  • (a) I argue (daily) that we fully understand consciousness but that philosophers

    (a) I argue (daily) that we fully understand consciousness but that philosophers are propagating the opposite because they’re too ignorant of the current science. Even within the sciences there is an emphasis on the leaves producing ignorance of trees and forest. In other words, the operational function of the nervous system, and the brain in particular, is relatively simple – it’s just massive, in parallel, and a highly competitive ‘economy’ fighting for attention.

    (b) Consciousness is incredibly simple, really. (All first principles of the universe at all scales are simple.) But it requires quite a bit of knowledge to understand. And it’s much easier if you have knowledge of neural networks, neuroscience, and demonstrated behavior down sufficiently to comprehend that simplicity.

    (c) I teach it and am producing courseware on it, so I’m relatively certain this is the case 😉

    Seriously. It’s simple.

    Reply addressees: @antonosika

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-31 14:28:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1686020991015682050

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1685942175396171776

  • No. Fascism is a reaction to communism. French socialism is a reaction to anglo

    No.
    Fascism is a reaction to communism. French socialism is a reaction to anglo empiricism. Jewish communism is a doubling down on french socialism. Each culture doubled down on its group strategy. Preserving the same ‘grammar’ and logic of persuasion they had in the previous epoch.

    Anglo empiricism is just rule of law by the natural law by common law (commonality and concurrency). But anglos and germans were high trust people and the french not so and the jews not at all.

    So the ideologies chose during modernization were dependent upon the trust and trustworthiness of the populations and the trust and trustworthiness of the populations was dependent upon the emergence of a lower middle(craftsmen) and middle class (merchants).

    Silly people read philosophy. It’s the bridge between childish theology and adolescent ignorance and irresponsibility.

    Smart people read military history (technology, production and trade routes), economics (cooperation, positive) and law (conflict, negatives).

    One reads theology and philosophy precisely because on is not bearing responsibility for sufficient reality to require concepts necessary for acting responsibly at scale in reality.

    Ergo, theology claims, philosophy sells, science, economics and law simply TELL.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-22 17:12:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682800842011815938

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682739448037908482

  • “Q: Curt: Is Race A Factor?” Race is a factor only in that (a) the races: multip

    “Q: Curt: Is Race A Factor?”
    Race is a factor only in that (a) the races: multiple African subraces > early African coastal diaspora thru Australia > South Eurasian Speciation Event (dry persian gulf, mena-to-india) > european speciation event > east asian hybrids (amerindians, turkics etc) > east asian speciation event (tibetan range?) each increase in neotenic evolution, and (b) class sizes were suppressed the further north, assisting neotenic evolution.

    So ‘the race problem is largely a class problem’ but only largely, and not entirely. In other words the tendency to express non-neotenic (early) impulse remains even in the upper classes of the less neotenic races.

    This is why proximity creates hostility and we are better together when we are together by separate polities in markets than the same societies and neighborhoods in the same polity. For the simple reason that the demands of behavioral regulation required by each race and class within each race follow neotenic evolution: the suppression of aggression and impulse for cooperation and agency.

    Reply addressees: @Chrece007 @sama

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-22 17:00:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682797655963885568

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682654076780027904

  • No. Conservatives demand everyone take personal responsibility for the equal car

    No. Conservatives demand everyone take personal responsibility for the equal care of the private and common (Paternal). Libertarians only for themselves (ascendant male). Progressive place no demand on personal responsibility but demand others take responsibility for the irresponsible (Maternal).

    All moral differences originate in sex differences in perception valuation and cognition:
    Male political systematizing over time and space, seeking status by the pursuit of responsibility for production and capitalization.
    -vs-
    Female interpersonal empathzing in time and space, seeking status by hyperconsumption by evasion of responsibility for production and capitalization, by externalization of that responsibility.

    It’s really that simple.

    Reply addressees: @BEARAMONGWOLVES

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-22 15:09:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682769816258592770

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682738755470508032

  • Commonality and concurency are not relevant when we are discussing a natural law

    Commonality and concurency are not relevant when we are discussing a natural law. Only when we are discovering a new violation of it in the court (commonality) or producing legislation that might affect it (concurrency).

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-21 17:58:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682449890842910721

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682415929752272896

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    TEST:
    (feedback please)
    –“The natural law requires we treat people equally in the resolution of disputes under the law but not equally in legislation that causes groups to conform to the law, by preserving the use of public legislation and private discrimination as a means of forcing integration, and preventing undesirable integration. As such anti-discrimination laws are a violation of the natural law.”–

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1682415929752272896

  • Please keep the Writers and Actors strike running for three or more years. Five

    Please keep the Writers and Actors strike running for three or more years. Five would be better. Even better, ending all copyright, and replacing it with the “Non Commercial” Creative Commons License.

    Why? As a penalty for using the creative industry for their sedition and treason and social construction of harms, assisting in the ‘march through the western institutions of cultural production” of which ‘woke’ is just the most recent sedition. The copyright was invented in order to produce taxes, but has been abused. It’s outlived it’s purpose. Creative Commons is enough.

    Explanation
    The Creative Commons licenses that allow for copying and distribution of artistic content but prohibit commercial use are:

    1) CC BY-NC: This license allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge the original creator and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.

    2) CC BY-NC-SA: This license allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as they credit the original creation and license their new creations under the identical terms. This means that any derivative works (works that are based on the original) must also be licensed as non-commercial.

    3) CC BY-NC-ND: This license is quite restrictive, allowing others to download the works and share them with others as long as they credit the original creation, but they can’t change them in any way or use them commercially.

    In all these licenses, “NC” stands for “Non-Commercial”, meaning that the work can be copied, distributed, displayed, performed, or modified, but not for commercial purposes.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-14 16:12:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679886525784260608

  • POLITICAL NECESSITIES Marginal indifference in proportionality (‘equality’) requ

    POLITICAL NECESSITIES
    Marginal indifference in proportionality (‘equality’) requires marginal indifference in ability, requires marginal indifference in genetics (ability) and culture (measurements) and institution (rules and processes). The eugenics program was the only movement that can prevent ‘The Great Filter” that causes all species to pass into extinction. Othewise conflict is deterministic as is decline that we saw as the result of the abrahamic cancer, just as we are seeing in the marxist cancer.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 17:37:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679545556954128400

  • PROPORTIONALITY AND DEFECTION However, should you defect by disassociation or em

    PROPORTIONALITY AND DEFECTION
    However, should you defect by disassociation or emigration that’s just fine. However, if you try to engage in crime, resistance, rebellion, or revolution whether by free riding, fraud, rent seeking, privatization of commons/socialization of losses into commons, corruption, sedition, treason, or war, then of course, you’re engaging in irreciprocity and can be … well, let’s say ‘corrected or removed’.

    #NLIGlossary

    Reply addressees: @JohannNetram @TheAutistocrat

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 16:39:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679530979650568192

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679527584512585728

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    PROPORTIONALITY: If in any given reciprocal exchange the benefit I obtain in proportion to your benefit is insufficient to continue cooperation – ie: disproportionate – then my incentive is to defect to a different individual group or polity with which to cooperate.
    Proportionality is a limit beyond which one’s interests to defect increase, until defection by disassociation, emigration, crime, resistance(sedition), rebellion(treason), or revolution(war).

    #NLIglossary

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1679527584512585728

  • The best a government can achieve is reciprocity within the limits of proportion

    The best a government can achieve is reciprocity within the limits of proportionality (meritocracy). This is only possible to achieve by ‘eliminating irreciprocities’ and creating market substitutes where markets are insufficient.

    Equality is impossible – it’s suicidal. But we can reduce inequality that always emerges in complex human systems because of the human tendency to seek discounts, free riding, subsidies, rents, and corruption.

    This is called ‘via-negativa’.

    Eliminates the immoral and only the moral remains.
    And that’s the best we can do.
    And if that won’t do then reproduction for those for whom it won’t do, is immoral.
    It’s that simple.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 15:07:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679507896730542081