Form: Argument

  • You are mistaken. There are no systems that abandon the monarchy as the ultimate

    You are mistaken. There are no systems that abandon the monarchy as the ultimate veto that are better than those that do. And the sovereignty of th parliament over the constitution, or in the (omg) continental law, where the elites are sovereign, is a catastrope.
    The people aren’t terribly bright.
    Law of democratic contrivance prevails.
    Iron law of oligarchy prevails.
    The renter problem of elected representatives prevails and as such monarchies are the only solution to all of the above, and the British agreement with the monarchy is the best there is: “above the law in the restoration of the law”. We are about to go through the post-war correction and the radical drop in standards of living that will result from the anglo-american construction of the rules based order, and see the re-emergence of either empires or powerful core states that might as well be, and with it the conflict of civilizations, and combined with population collapse we will rapidly discover the end of the luxury of 20th/21st century fantasy of endless growth, and the neo liberal order.
    The optimum government for man was invented by the English and only the codification of the law improved by the Americans. For reasons I’ve written exhaustively elsewhere there is no superior system for man.

    Reply addressees: @JohnPBowenMusic @BladeoftheS


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-18 23:55:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692686581994291201

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692684131040186585

  • REDUCTION OF OUR CIVILIZATIONAL CRISIS TO ONE SIMPLE SOLUTION The majority of ou

    REDUCTION OF OUR CIVILIZATIONAL CRISIS TO ONE SIMPLE SOLUTION
    The majority of our social and political ills can be solved rather simply by restoring the primacy of the intergenerational family and their production of children as the purpose of policy, and granting that priority in all aspects of the commons over that of the individual. Law (dispute resolution) must regulate the individual but legislation (commons production) must regulate society, and society = children, or you don’t have a society for long.
    Restore the primacy of the intergenerational family – it creates only thing we have in common – the only commensurability between us, by which decisions on policy can be made without favoring the disfunctional at the expense of the whole.
    The enlightenment project completed with the leftist feminist war on the family.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-16 16:13:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691845691906162693

  • OUR REFORMATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT Q: Curt: “Should The First Amendment be [

    OUR REFORMATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT
    Q: Curt: “Should The First Amendment be [insert idea here]?:

    All,
    Our reformation of the first amendment consists of:

    a) The requirement for testifiable, truthful, and reciprocal speech in public to the public in matters public (including commerce) to prevent false promises deception and lying; This ends the left forever, because all leftists promises are those of a removal of responsibility by social construction of denial of the four categories of the laws of nature: lying.

    b) The prohibition on suppression of testifiable, truthful, reciprocal speech. This ends the suppression of uncomfortable truths so that we may find solutions to problems that exist rather than ignore them.

    c) The prohibition on conspiracy to cancel constraining us to courts for the negativa, and legislature for the positiva thus not evading due process – ending all variations on cancel culture and social construction by bypass of the legislature and the people (including lawfare).

    d) The restoration of defamation by libel and slander to whether it’s true or not instead of whether the harm is material or not to end undermining.

    e) To provide a special exception for Christian religion if necessary – given that fundamentalism is an untestifable claim and therefore violates truthful reciprocal speech.

    Note that, we would prefer that we license Christian deism and natural law since it’s at least analogistically not-false, it’s closed to misconstruing, and compatible with natural law. But that might not be possible given it’s tolerable by secularists, humanists, Catholics, mainstream protestants, but not so by evangelicals. This keeps the state out of the religion but encourages the Christian sects to reform.

    Note that, It’s increasingly clear that we must very likely limit religions and in particular their manifestation in public in any form, to the Christian secular to evangelical, and only tolerate other religions – including the mass prosecution of religions for the behavior of their individuals adherents. This forces integration or departure. And as we know, the hostiles hide under religious protection.
    I would never have thought this reasonable in the past, but my study of religion as the foundation of group evolutionary strategies, the incompatibility of those strategies, and the use of religions as a means of sedition, treason, and warfare changed my opinion – l like many opinions I’ve changed once I’ve done the work (despite that I don’t like some of what I’ve discovered.)

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @tysonmaly


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 17:05:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691133943767093266

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691119879665909760

  • (a) causality results in (b) distribution and (c) stereotypes are the most accur

    (a) causality results in (b) distribution and (c) stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social science, just as iq is the most accurate measure in psychology.

    You are also unaware that you just demonstrated feminine cognition by demonstrating disapproval of an unpleasant empirical, logical, and scientific truth in favor of avoiding social conflict and thereby exporting the responsibility for adaptation to the cognitively masculine.

    Reply addressees: @JFrancisLawton @donmasra @EPoe187


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-12 12:09:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690334575958822913

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690267752240390145

  • Idiosycratic experience of a pocket is not evidence of scale; opinion is confirm

    Idiosycratic experience of a pocket is not evidence of scale; opinion is confirmation bias, and your opinion contradicts the evidence. We are closer to civil war on the scale of the french revolution; closer to population collapse than the thirty years war; closer to economic collapse than the great depression, and closer to strategic collapse than the late roman empire, and a fall on that scale would accelerate and deepen all of the above. They are aware and informed but not mature, responsible, serious, knowledgable or competent – and they as indoctrinated into pseudoscience as the most superstitious. So you are confusing the temporary luxury of the remains of prosperity with generational competency to maintain it.

    Reply addressees: @BobHatchett


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-12 11:59:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690332064438984705

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690321244061650945

  • You’re right Charlotte. End marriage, common property, alimony, and child suppor

    You’re right Charlotte. End marriage, common property, alimony, and child support. The child only exists because of the choices of the mother. Only exists because she birthed the child. Is almost entirely dependent upon her for the first five to seven years of life. Because of men’s efforts, women are now capable of economic self-support. As such women may certainly take full possession and ownership of all children, and have no need of the caretaking of men.

    Yes as a consequence the single parent household has radically reduced household incomes, driven up the cost of living, produced the most mentally unstable generations in history, below replacement rate reproduction, caused reproductive collapse in all developed countries, rendered our population insufficient for social insurance of unemployment, medicine, and retirement, reduced the quality of education and higher education, limited our international competitiveness to the point where we are dependent upon foreign students for sciences
    are the result will be ending the advantage of our military and the dollar, starving investment in infrastructure, causing political divisiveness and conflict, and advancing the relative certainty of political instability and likely civil war.

    You can’t keep expanding selfishness when the entire reason for female privilege is the western paternal hierarchical and institutional mass production of individual responsibility for the private and common, reducing costs for all.

    We are painfully aware of sex differences in cognition, with the feminine cognition favoring empathizing in-time (feels), verbalizing and social construction, hyperconsumption, hypergamy, attention, seeking status through all of the above, and evasion of accountability and evasion of responsibility for the commons, and male cognition favoring systematizing over time (reals), physical world transformation, and political organization, hypercapitalizing, production, seeking status by all of the above, and accumulation of accountability and responsibility for the commons.

    All you have done with the present generation is convince men that all of history is correct – and if anything, norms, traditions, values, and institutions have been far too generous in their criticism of the selfishness, shallowness, novelty-seeking, and impulsivity of women.

    We used to try to make one another happy by becoming one together. We didn’t succeed as often as we desired, but we tried. You took women off the pedestal. Destroyed our convenient mythology. The incentive for that reciprocity. And the counter-revolution isn’t going to be kind or pretty.

    All market failures result in either extinction or restoration of equilibria.

    Reply addressees: @DrProudman


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-11 02:17:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689823405422288896

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689326476502474776

  • We already know that gods exist as fictional characters, just as the power of th

    We already know that gods exist as fictional characters, just as the power of the state exists as a fiction, just a the value of paper money is a fiction, just as the perception of individual agency and competency consists as a fiction.
    This fiction of a god, like the other fictions, happens to serve its purpose just fine.
    But, while you may not understand this, there is no place from the quantum background (the fine medium) on upward for the divine or for any transmission of information. So we have ruled out the possibility of a god outside of the universe, allowed the analogy of god as the laws of the universe, and settled on the analogy of god as a father, headman, chieftain, king which oddly enough gives civilizations incompatible advice rules and laws -and through prophets and scholars who clearly make up nonsense as they see fit.
    God is a convenient system of weights and measures of moral behavior that assists in cooperation in a polity within that polity’s group evolutionary strategy.
    It’s just the simplest possible measure man can understand – capable even for children, women, and the mentally impaired, and the cowardly men among us who need such pampering as do children.

    Reply addressees: @univcompass


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-10 20:57:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689742872457719808

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689721062903193602

  • I don’t understand. “Scripture” is intolerable for at least 2/3 of the populatio

    I don’t understand.
    “Scripture” is intolerable for at least 2/3 of the population. Even among the 1/3 that is devoted to it, the evidence is that it’s largely indoctrination. Yet there is a percentage of the population is so dependent on empathizing (feelz) that they require a proxy (a figure) they can empathize and sympathize with and imitate, and simple rules that insulate natural human neuroticism.
    Aquinas was right: if the science falsifies the scripture then the science decides. Hence his direction of the church and the faithful to natural law (which is what we do). And hence the catholic church’s emphasis on god and dogma in support of natural law rather than the bible and jesus common to protestants.
    What the church should have simply done is to state that they were right all along they just lacked the skill to understand the works of god in god’s own language: the laws of the universe.
    The reason being that Christianity once germanicized, gave women, slaves, and serfs a means of obtaining status and virtue by doing no wrong rather than the aristocracy’s requirement for virtue that required education training resources wealth and the capacity for war.
    So Christian ethics can be reduced to about five rules. It turns out that these five rules solve the problem of the prisoner’s dilemma, and are necessary for the production of mindfulness, and subsequent production of a high trust society.
    But largely it’s just the same process as masculine stoicism with ‘feminine characteristics’ of caretaking.

    Reply addressees: @jrayrealhealth @univcompass


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-09 20:04:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689367171976073216

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689358404664569857

  • I’m stating the abrahamic religions are the worst invention in the history of ma

    I’m stating the abrahamic religions are the worst invention in the history of man, and that ‘curing’ that problem is *the greatest problem facing humanity*.
    Now I’m saying this for scientific and technical reasons so it’s not just an opinion.
    The semitic cults weaponized the feminine.
    Islam simply used the masculine to impose the feminine.
    What is the feminine: magical thinking, evasion of responsibility, and evasion of reality, by the social construction of illusion to escape the pressure ov evolutionary adaptation, and doing so by the destruction of all male responsibility, realism, innovation, adaptation, and evolution of cooperation at larger and larger scales.

    Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-07 14:45:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688562130734227456

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688553572093370368

  • In other words, the USA created the rules-based-order to produce free trade, end

    In other words, the USA created the rules-based-order to produce free trade, ending empires, and imperial trade routes, in favor of sovereign nation states, economic prosperity, and human rights (that empires can’t provide). The purpose was to prevent another world war.

    But this provision came at the expense of the american worker. Now, if you understand that we are in period of hyperconsumption of nothing but status signals, and that instead we could have more investment less inequality and

    So the more CHAOS AND WAR in the world better it is for the USA(Canada, Mexico) and our people. Reversing the rules based order, by the assent of non-democratic countries

    Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-06 17:09:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688235752969113600

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688196322363428865