In other words, if you want the benefit of the commons, then you may not impose costs upon those who produce and depend on those commons, where the institution of property is itself a commons produced by reciprocal exchange of defense of that commons.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 16:41:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188858280543752194
Reply addressees: @natrolleon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188858073944854528
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@natrolleon Can you give an example? I’m saying that we always and everywhere suppress parasitism by the incremental suppression of irreciprocity using the court under the natural law of reciprocity that we call tort, and the system of measurement of tort we call property.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188858073944854528
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@natrolleon Can you give an example? I’m saying that we always and everywhere suppress parasitism by the incremental suppression of irreciprocity using the court under the natural law of reciprocity that we call tort, and the system of measurement of tort we call property.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188858073944854528
Leave a Reply