Form: Argument

  • Either you act by display word and deed according to European tradition of Trifu

    Either you act by display word and deed according to European tradition of Trifunctionalism: “Military, Law, Faith. Each in its place”. In a MARKET competition, preserving our group strategy of adaptation, and our competition between elites.

    Or you are the enemy of our people.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-05 15:06:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246816421163737088

    Reply addressees: @MillikanTamzin @DudeMaximus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246815869084274689


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MillikanTamzin @DudeMaximus I don’t care what you believe. I care only whether you display speak and act with reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, including speaking the truth warrantied by due diligence against ignorance error bias and deceit.

    You don’t. I’m accusing you of false testimony.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1246815869084274689

  • I don’t care what you believe. I care only whether you display speak and act wit

    I don’t care what you believe. I care only whether you display speak and act with reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, including speaking the truth warrantied by due diligence against ignorance error bias and deceit.

    You don’t. I’m accusing you of false testimony.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-05 15:04:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246815869084274689

    Reply addressees: @MillikanTamzin @DudeMaximus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246815300126945280

  • Again. What do you think I was saying? “Game is cognitive behavioral therapy for

    Again. What do you think I was saying?

    “Game is cognitive behavioral therapy for infantilized males (at the expense of infantilized females, caused by the tendency of women to infantilize, because the infantile are easily manipulated by seduction across the infant-child-female-male spectrum, and this is why we must return to separating boys and girls in education, just as we must return to overlapping ‘one room school’, separated by ability, and even race given our differences in rates of maturity, emphasis on fitness, on competition, and the high cost of doing so.”

    In other words, I was being critical of ‘game’ as compensating for the dominance of feminism in education.

    You didn’t get the irony.

    And then you personalized it.

    And then you retaliated against it.

    Without seeking to understand it.

    To determine whether it was true regardless of whether it was desirable.

    Which is what women tend to do:

    1. NAXALT,

    2. Personalize,

    3. Conflate desirable with truth,

    4. use GSRRM to undermine the truth,

    5. use GSRRM to undermine the truth speaker,

    6. manipulate to circumvent the truth, and;

    7. encourage infantilism to preserve the ability to manipulate, 8. because women’s instincts are dysgenic because of the high cost of her offspring. And the monotheistic religions of the old world, and the pseudoscientific religions of marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD Denialism are both means of satisfying women’s (and weak men’s) intuitions to preserve investments regardless of their merit, just as men’s intuitions are to preserve investments by the advancement of merit.

    Now, I don’t believe men and women have any control over these instincts – that is, until we learn to have agency. Men have had thousands of years to learn to develop institutions that force them to have agency, rather than engage in political and physical super-predation.

    But women have had less than a century to develop institutions that force them to have agency rather than engage in social and interpersonal super-predation. And the 20th century collapse of civilization has been made possible by the use of pseudoscience sophistry, denial and deceit to sell the false promise of escape from Darwin, Malthus, and the compromises between Genders and classes ameliorated by our use of the law of tort, truthful testimony, and the jury.

    Women live longer, are coddled by both men and women, Create 70% of college debt, but a minority of ‘real’ degrees, determine elections, consume 70% of government resources, but spend 70% of family income, are the target of 90%+ of advertising, determine what propaganda and media is produced, are privileged in divorce, demand economic privilege at every opportunity, where only white males between 30-50 are net tax contributors, die earlier, get lest medical investment, are more likely to suicide because of it.

    So if women are the vector for despotic political religion in the ancient world and despotic political pseudo-religion in the modern, and are responsible for immigration, taxation, the dismantlement of the constitution, and the civili society because their instincts are dysgenic, then what reforms are necessary to bring women into parity with men with equal suppression of their harmful instincts?

    I mean, talk about hyperconsumption.

    I mean, talk about consumption of civilizational capital.

    It’s not men doing it.

    It’s women.

    Who are totally unconscious of their selfishness.

    P-law eliminates the use of seduction to bait women (and weak men) into hazard by appeal to their intuitions in favor of dysgenia and decline (the instinct of the herd), because that was the primary criminal invention of the 20th century – a repeat of the jewish and christian invention of criminality in the first century – this time by sophism, pseudoscience, and denial, instead of the occult.

    So all of that was underneath the post.

    You just didn’t think it through.

    Because you leapt to your feelings.

    You didn’t demonstrate agency.

    And it is agency that separates human from animal.

    If men did the same we would be back in an era of continuous domestic violence. Instead we are in a period where men largely control their physical violence, and women do not control their social violence.

    I think things through.

    If you ever think I am wrong.

    Then either you don’t understand.

    Or the animal inside is talking so you can’t

    Not the human we seek to build on top of it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 11:23:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/91983328_247803306617830_27064540436

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/91983328_247803306617830_27064540436

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/91983328_247803306617830_2706454043638628352_o_247803303284497.jpg WHICH ONE OF US DENIES GOD’S HAND?

    P’s premise is sovereignty reciprocity and testifiability that produce universal calculability in human word and deed. And that faith is by definition and necessity not testifiable. Meaning that one does not bring faith to court. if it isn’t a matter for court, then do as you will. We cannot legislate faith. We can only legislate actions. We can legislate against pseudoscience sophistry and the supernatural to advance frauds. Christianity does not ask us to legislate frauds. judaism, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and human biodiversity denial do ask us to. This is because our civilization has always separated law and religion under trifunctionalism. And as such we deliver unto god and Caesar’s law separately. This competition between material and spiritual has prevented the evils of jewish and muslim religion (deceits), the stagnation of the Hindu (too much mysticism), and the despotism of the Chinese (too much authority), and the crimes of the catholic church (too much corruption). So P continues the tradition of producing law law. And MEASURING DIFFERENT RELIGIONS by their violation of the law. If a religion does not violate the laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the evolutionary law of transcendence, then it does not violate the EVIDENCE of god’s hand in his own writing – the evidence written in the universe- rather than man’s misinterpretation of it. In the test of whether man has misinterpreted god’s intent, lied about god’s intent, the laws of nature, natural law and evolutionary necessity of transcendence allow us, using the evidence of gods’ hand, to determine the errors in religion. There is no error in Jesus’ teachings. It is the scientifically correct optimum. There is plenty of violation of gods laws in the bible. And every political religion (and christianity is a political religion) is far worse than the misinterpretations in the bible that does not come from Jesus’ teachings. The true religions are nature worship and ancestor worship (heathenism), hero worship (paganism), and a political religion of which christianity appears the optimum – at least, as Jesus spoke it not the many many people who have ‘interpreted’ everything other than Jesus’ word. I am bound by the necessities of physical law, the natural law and of evolutionary law of transcendence – because those are the only *faultless* evidence of god’s word and deed, whether one follows Divine, deist, or naturalist understandings of god. As such if you disagree with my position you must choose the words of men who erred and lied over the words of Jesus and the hand of god written in the hand of god, the physical laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the necessity of evolutionary transcendence. So which one of us denies god? You or me?WHICH ONE OF US DENIES GOD’S HAND?

    P’s premise is sovereignty reciprocity and testifiability that produce universal calculability in human word and deed. And that faith is by definition and necessity not testifiable. Meaning that one does not bring faith to court. if it isn’t a matter for court, then do as you will. We cannot legislate faith. We can only legislate actions. We can legislate against pseudoscience sophistry and the supernatural to advance frauds. Christianity does not ask us to legislate frauds. judaism, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and human biodiversity denial do ask us to. This is because our civilization has always separated law and religion under trifunctionalism. And as such we deliver unto god and Caesar’s law separately. This competition between material and spiritual has prevented the evils of jewish and muslim religion (deceits), the stagnation of the Hindu (too much mysticism), and the despotism of the Chinese (too much authority), and the crimes of the catholic church (too much corruption). So P continues the tradition of producing law law. And MEASURING DIFFERENT RELIGIONS by their violation of the law. If a religion does not violate the laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the evolutionary law of transcendence, then it does not violate the EVIDENCE of god’s hand in his own writing – the evidence written in the universe- rather than man’s misinterpretation of it. In the test of whether man has misinterpreted god’s intent, lied about god’s intent, the laws of nature, natural law and evolutionary necessity of transcendence allow us, using the evidence of gods’ hand, to determine the errors in religion. There is no error in Jesus’ teachings. It is the scientifically correct optimum. There is plenty of violation of gods laws in the bible. And every political religion (and christianity is a political religion) is far worse than the misinterpretations in the bible that does not come from Jesus’ teachings. The true religions are nature worship and ancestor worship (heathenism), hero worship (paganism), and a political religion of which christianity appears the optimum – at least, as Jesus spoke it not the many many people who have ‘interpreted’ everything other than Jesus’ word. I am bound by the necessities of physical law, the natural law and of evolutionary law of transcendence – because those are the only *faultless* evidence of god’s word and deed, whether one follows Divine, deist, or naturalist understandings of god. As such if you disagree with my position you must choose the words of men who erred and lied over the words of Jesus and the hand of god written in the hand of god, the physical laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the necessity of evolutionary transcendence. So which one of us denies god? You or me?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 02:08:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF MORALITY IF NOT XXXX? Very simple logic. Why should the st

    WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF MORALITY IF NOT XXXX?

    Very simple logic.

    Why should the strong not conquer, rape, pillage, and murder the weak?

    Because cooperation and numbers can be more rewarding over the long term.

    When are cooperation and numbers more rewarding than conquest, rape, pillage, and murder?

    When behavior is reciprocal.

    What does reciprocal mean?

    Do nothing that imposes costs upon the demonstrated interests of others either directly or indirectly – and conquer, rape, pillage, and murder anyone who does.

    And how do I do nothing that imposes costs upon the demonstrated interests of others either directly, or indirectly?

    Limit your display word and deed to productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality,

    The consequence: the most moral condition humanity can possibly create.

    Such men are the gods among men.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:53:00 UTC

  • STATE BUREAUCRACIES MUST ORGANIZE FOR WAR I make the same argument. the CDC, Hom

    STATE BUREAUCRACIES MUST ORGANIZE FOR WAR

    I make the same argument. the CDC, Homeland Security, and Disaster Relief Organization, and The Treasury are either creating war plans and holding war games or they are wasting our time and money.

    Bureaucracies run by constant process rather than project deliverables, war plans, and shocks

    —“In 2015, I urged world leaders in a TED talk to prepare for a pandemic the same way they prepare for war — by running simulations to find the cracks in the system,” Gates wrote. “As we’ve seen this year, we have a long way to go. But I still believe that if we make the right decisions now, informed by science, data and the experience of medical professionals, we can save lives and get the country back to work.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:36:00 UTC

  • For outgroup peoples like the chinese it would mean permanent ban on the company

    For outgroup peoples like the chinese it would mean permanent ban on the company’s imports, permanent prohibition from the financial system, and permanent ban on any company employing any of the people involved.

  • For outgroup peoples like the chinese it would mean permanent ban on the company

    For outgroup peoples like the chinese it would mean permanent ban on the company’s imports, permanent prohibition from the financial system, and permanent ban on any company employing any of the people involved.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-30 12:06:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244596788587347968

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244596272461492226


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricLiford The need for collective punishment is to return to ingroup members demand to police their own. Most corp criminality would be solved this way.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1244596272461492226

  • The need for collective punishment is to return to ingroup members demand to pol

    The need for collective punishment is to return to ingroup members demand to police their own. Most corp criminality would be solved this way.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-30 12:04:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244596272461492226

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244594679787765761

  • Three questions of law: Restitution > Punishment > Prevention. For something of

    Three questions of law: Restitution > Punishment > Prevention. For something of this nature? Restitution is apology(humiliation) by everyone in the organization (collective punishment); 10x (many times); Punishment Fine everyone in the organization. Prevent:audit everyone x yrs.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-30 12:02:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244595944831803392

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244594679787765761