Yes, we will get the working class that has families. We will not get the disaffectd mentally ill underclass that hates everyone because they are infantilized and unmarketable.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-30 01:24:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244435203520692225
Reply addressees: @EricLiford @ArthurHolmberg
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244434934246387715
The left is useful yes because we have a shared enemy preventing both sides from success. The question is whether we agree to separate into regional differences or not. If not then… it’s just step one step two.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-30 01:23:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244434983483252737
Reply addressees: @EricLiford @ArthurHolmberg
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244434747864088576
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@EricLiford @ArthurHolmberg Well you have your opinion on whether the quarantine is fake but the data is the data and quarantines are working to flatten the curve, which is the only way to limit fatalities. Any business that doesn’t have 6 months cash dies. It will require vast war era programs to restart.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1244434747864088576
Price to us of your way of life. Price to you of our way of life. Price to both under civil war. Price to both if we separate. It’s separate or civil war. And probably soon. I work on ‘separate peacefully’.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-30 00:53:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244427397979668491
Reply addressees: @ArthurHolmberg
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244384776745881600
Yes, although for example, last night he used argumentation ethics in error to do that. People don’t correct you out of a universal good or truth – but to deny your means of persuading or coerce them. Hoppe makes similar errors.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-29 14:15:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244267011909320705
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244266440250863616
Liberalism and the modern left represent consumption and dysgenic interests. Conservatives and the modern right represent capitalization and eugenic interests. The optimum social orders are at all times small ethnically homogenous nation states. Period. Science.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 22:24:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244027516496601088
Reply addressees: @KeithWoodsYT
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244027202036957186
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@KeithWoodsYT Why on earth do you think you understand?
Who are conservatives talking to and why?
Why do you think you are the audience?
What responsibilities for others do you have? (none).
What responsibilities do their audience have?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1244027202036957186
There are no best races. There are races and sub-races with better demographics. So better social, economic, and political results. There are best civilizations. That’s just the science. But you would have a problem with the truth. It’s ok. I understand. It’s hard for you.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 21:46:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244018117505933312
Reply addressees: @spacepencilcase
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244016910725009410
WHY IS CURT DOOLITTLE SO HOSTILE IN REFORMING LIBERTARIANISM INTO SOVEREIGNTARIANISM?
—“UPB It’s built on non-contradiction. Making it’s epistemology rationalism; thereby ignoring: natural law, game theory, prisoner’s dilemma, etc.”—Andrew M Gilmour
—“UPB is Kantianism (Hoppeanism) for fever-level IQs. It is the language of an adolescent just learning to venture beyond his mother’s purview. This has been his project from the outset (DEFOOing). He never completed the developmental arc. … Man requires information, not imperative.”—James Krieger
—“I can only unite the libertarian, conservative, and religious if I restore responsibility of the militia of every able bodied man to bear the cost of the organized use of violence to enforce our demand for sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, excellence and beauty, jury and law, family and kin, commons and capitalization as the central objects of social organization and political policy. To do that we require an intellectual vanguard. The classical libertarians have always been our intellectual wing, the conservatives decidedly anti-intellectual, and the religious conservatives hostile to the intellectual. I have to deprive the libertarian intellectual class of false promise of freedom from the cost of organized violence in a universal militia of kin, and to together we must bear the cost of depriving the left of freedom from the cost of hyper-consumption and dysgenic reproduction and the hedonism of the individual’s maximization of consumption as the central object of policy and social organization. The left is cancerous growth of man on both this planet, mankind, man’s future, and the possibility of the transcendence of man into the gods we might yet be.”— Curt Doolittle
Sovereignty = Responsibility.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 16:38:00 UTC
Either statements are testifiable or they are not. If they are not testifiable one cannot make a truth claim. For a statement to be testifiable requires it survive the tests of all dimensions, because the only closure available is falsification of all dimensions.
Sorry. Just is.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 14:31:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243546195554971655
Reply addressees: @AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243545710756270089
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K The fact that you’re still stuck in the early 20th c because philosophy was a dead end for truth, and limited to choice (or deceit) is simply that you’ve overinvested in a malinvestment. Reformation is extremely expensive. And humans protect investments (loss aversion).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243545710756270089
No more sophistry. Philosophy is closed. Science has fully replaced it. P-law is complete. Including Metaphysics, Epistemology, Psychology, Ethics, Sociology, Economics, Politics, Law, Group Strategy, and Aesthetics.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 13:24:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243529370662309888
Reply addressees: @KANTBOT20K @Doland58655726
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243528455318355973
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@KANTBOT20K @Doland58655726 … that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness.
So in P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Vocabulary, logic, syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum of those grammars.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243528455318355973
YES P IS A FORMAL ALGORITHMIC, OPERATIONAL, SCIENCE – IT IS THE MOST COMPLETE SCiENCE: LAW – BY WHICH ALL OTHERS ARE JUDGED
—“You are not a scientist. You are a story teller. Arranging information, data, statistics, iqs into a self-deceptive, bias confirming narrative. As are the majority of scientists generally. Empirical science is inferior. Lacking holism and art. I renounce it.”—Learned Dr. Kantbot, PhD
SCIENCES: 1. Formal(Logics: logic, mathematics, algorithmic, operational). 2. Physical (the laws of nature). 3. Psychological (cognitive science), and 4. Social (Social science: economics, law, politics, group strategy).
P-law is a formal, operational, and algorithmic logic using a universally commensurable grammar (paradigm, vocabulary, logic grammar syntax), that tests (falsifies) every possible dimension of thought: coherent (consistent, correspondent, existentially and operationally possible).
Now, you might arbitrarily define ‘science’, but by any present definition P-law is scientific. It is logical, empirical, operational, and under realism, naturalism, rational choice, and reciprocity.
Human Faculties (physical process) > Epistemology > Grammar > Vocabulary > Speech > Due Diligence > including Ethics.
Faculties: 1. Sense, Integration by prediction 2. Space-Time Modeling prediction, 3. Auto Association prediction (intuition), Auto Evaluation (emotion), 4. Attention-Recursion, 5. Reason, Planning, Calculation, Computation, 6. Action-Release > Repeat.
Epistemology: Observation > Free Association > Hypothesis (reason tested) > Theory (operationally tested), > Surviving Theory (market tested) > Limitation > Falsification > Repeat.
In P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Paradigm and Vocabulary, grammar, logic, and syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum of those grammars.
A Grammar refers to the Paradigm (permissible dimensions of perception, cognition, and action), the Names, Operations, and Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation (morpheme, word, phrase, sentence, story organization) and the LOGIC (constant relations) that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness.
Vocabulary: Deflation and disambiguation by competition, operationalization, and serialization, ex: Moral: Evil < Bad < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good > Righteous. or Truth: Tautological < Analytic < Idea < Testifiable < Honest < Untested.
Speech: Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limited to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence),and sets of transactions.
Due Diligence: realism, naturalism, sensory, identity (categorical), internal (logical), operational (actions in time), external (empirical), rational (bounded rationality), reciprocal (moral – reciprocal rationality), limited, fully accounted, warranteed, restitutable.
Ethics (Morality): Productive, Fully informed, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warrantied, by due diligence against error bias and deceit, within the limits of restitution.
No more sophistry. Philosophy is closed. Science has fully replaced it. P-law is complete. Including Metaphysics, Epistemology, Psychology, Ethics, Sociology, Economics, Politics, Law, Group Strategy, and Aesthetics.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 09:56:00 UTC