Form: Argument

  • The Only Test of Your Ideas Is Law

    (natural law is to human sciences, as mathematics is to physical sciences)

    [I]f you can’t write a body of policy changes, a project plan, contracts, shareholder agreements, a body of law, and a constitution to make a society function you’re just talking smack – because that is the hierarchy of algorithms that produce not a simulation but the operating system of the real world that we live in. You must program a computer via positiva, because it cannot imagine, or predict, and so cannot choose without those instructions. But you must program humanity via negativa because it can imagine, predict, and choose – which is why humans can adapt and computers can’t. And while both a computer and a human are amoral, the computer cannot choose between morality and immorality. The human can. And the purpose of our manners, ethics morals, norms, traditions, institutions and laws is to rase the cost of the immoral choices so that only moral choices remain. But we all test that limit at every opportunity.

  • The Only Test of Your Ideas Is Law

    (natural law is to human sciences, as mathematics is to physical sciences)

    [I]f you can’t write a body of policy changes, a project plan, contracts, shareholder agreements, a body of law, and a constitution to make a society function you’re just talking smack – because that is the hierarchy of algorithms that produce not a simulation but the operating system of the real world that we live in. You must program a computer via positiva, because it cannot imagine, or predict, and so cannot choose without those instructions. But you must program humanity via negativa because it can imagine, predict, and choose – which is why humans can adapt and computers can’t. And while both a computer and a human are amoral, the computer cannot choose between morality and immorality. The human can. And the purpose of our manners, ethics morals, norms, traditions, institutions and laws is to rase the cost of the immoral choices so that only moral choices remain. But we all test that limit at every opportunity.

  • The Lesson of Comparative Civilizations

    [S]o, what is the lesson we learn from our study of history? That european peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically, faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each others interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds of our production to the commons and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, economic and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it.

  • The Lesson of Comparative Civilizations

    [S]o, what is the lesson we learn from our study of history? That european peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically, faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each others interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds of our production to the commons and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, economic and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it.

  • If we restore strict construction, universal standing in matters of the commons

    If we restore strict construction, universal standing in matters of the commons we will produce class actions in court that make irreciprocal political sector actors pay, and further constrain corporations of scale. Loser pays will prevent abuses. etc. …


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 21:00:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253066090877521925

    Reply addressees: @judicialist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253065501489672193


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @judicialist The problem arose during the industrial revolution when our right to defend the commons in court(our ‘standing’) was revoked by the state – we were disintermediated from defense of the commons.This created opportunity for political corruption in our otherwise adaptive common law.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1253065501489672193

  • The problem arose during the industrial revolution when our right to defend the

    The problem arose during the industrial revolution when our right to defend the commons in court(our ‘standing’) was revoked by the state – we were disintermediated from defense of the commons.This created opportunity for political corruption in our otherwise adaptive common law.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 20:57:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253065501489672193

    Reply addressees: @judicialist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253065089776787459


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @judicialist Well, innovation in the division of knowledge labor, production and distribution creates opportunity for innovation in free riding, fraud, rent seeking, and corruption – so we have to produce a market and incentives to suppress these ir-reciprocities. Endless Competition via +/-.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1253065089776787459

  • We don’t need to increase ‘fairness’ or ‘social justice’ neither of which are ei

    We don’t need to increase ‘fairness’ or ‘social justice’ neither of which are either definable or measureable, but we need to return to suppression of the reproduction of those that cannot compete in the suite of market tests at whatever level of development that we’re in.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 12:05:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252569137798434817

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252568559953338369


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst Which is the purpose of my work on the law: to end the repeatedly successful use of abrahamic technique at destroying civilizations from within by false promise, baiting into hazard, selling to vulnerable women and the underclasses, and reversing east and west eugenics.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1252568559953338369

  • Which is the purpose of my work on the law: to end the repeatedly successful use

    Which is the purpose of my work on the law: to end the repeatedly successful use of abrahamic technique at destroying civilizations from within by false promise, baiting into hazard, selling to vulnerable women and the underclasses, and reversing east and west eugenics.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 12:03:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252568559953338369

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252568114656677889


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst This means if it’s genetic, as it is in our women,it’s irreparable, and separation is the only possibility. If it’s purely cultural (doesn’t appear to be) then it’s a matter of separating from their culture. Either way we have to outlaw it by requiring truthful reciprocal speech.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1252568114656677889

  • This means if it’s genetic, as it is in our women,it’s irreparable, and separati

    This means if it’s genetic, as it is in our women,it’s irreparable, and separation is the only possibility. If it’s purely cultural (doesn’t appear to be) then it’s a matter of separating from their culture. Either way we have to outlaw it by requiring truthful reciprocal speech.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 12:01:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252568114656677889

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252567628062826496


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst So if Jewish war on western-sensemaking, our realism, naturalism, operationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity, testimony, commons, and eugenics, is a continuation of their ancient world rebellion against the masculine empires, and an involuntary rebellion against evolution-eugenics.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1252567628062826496

  • So if Jewish war on western-sensemaking, our realism, naturalism, operationalism

    So if Jewish war on western-sensemaking, our realism, naturalism, operationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity, testimony, commons, and eugenics, is a continuation of their ancient world rebellion against the masculine empires, and an involuntary rebellion against evolution-eugenics.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 11:59:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252567628062826496

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252567055997468672


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst Female Social Construction to Manage behavioral growth of children, using her seduction > The Jewish group strategy (undermining host peoples, while riding on their commons) > The Anti Evolutionary (domestication) Canon: Freud, Boas, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida, Trotsky-Kristol.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1252567055997468672