Form: Argument

THERE IS ONLY ONE CHRISTIAN: JESUS. AND THE CHURCH WAS AN INVASION AND CONQUEST OF OUR PEOPLE TO TURN WARRIORS INTO SLAVES.

—“If all the religions were so similar and provided the same product they would have produced similar results. “—

The point is that group strategy, military, and law influence adults, who are capable of and exercise agency (action) – and religion influences women and children, the weak and the poor who lack agency.

Religion provides mindfulness as the first group drags the second group through time. Religions don’t lead – they create mindfulness that prevents defection so that the people may be led, despite the insecurity alienation and anonymity that arises as families, clans, and tribes scale and consolidate into polities.

—“the faith was built on the natural laws (Gods Laws)”—

We have discovered THREE sets of god’s laws:

1. The physical laws of nature (action)

… 2. The logical laws of consistency (thought)

… … 3. The grammatical laws of paradigms (speech)

4. The natural law of reciprocity (cooperation)

… 5. The christian law of love (seduction into cooperation)

… … 6. The political law of homogeneity (incentive to insure)

7. The evolutionary law of transcendence (defeat the red queen).

… … 8. The … law of self domestication

… … … 9. The …. law of competition..

Of this set of God’s laws, what does Christianity DENY?

1. physical laws of nature.

6. the political law of homogeneity

7. the evolutionary law of transcendence

8. the … law of self domestication

9. the … law of competition.

What does this mean? Christianity is a feminine religion, because it uses the counter-evolutionary strategy of females. And all female societies die without host males. Just as christians only survive with host Aryans, jews can only survive with host male populations, and Muslims hyper-violate these laws by consuming and destroying those host populations.

—” looking at historical performance “—

A monopoly takes credit for the good that would occur in any civilization but not credit for the bad – in economics we learn that we must judge by full accounting, not cherry picking, and account for the seen and unseen, and measure by opportunity cost – the difference between possible choices.

Looking at historical performance of the church and christian rome vs aristocracy and literate rome, we have to ask, why did the church choose subjugation supernaturalism, and spreading ignorance rather than militarization, engineering, and spreading literacy as did the roman aristocracy? THe dark ages exist just as much because of the church and religion as it did because of the migration period invasions,made possible by the roman holocaust against the celts.

While european aristocracy, military, law, and mythology survived, It took the restoration of (a) viking military, (b) aristotelian reason, (c) north sea trade by first vikings then the hansa (c) literacy (d) then the

In the difference between possible choices, there was obvious and necessary utility of an heroic underclass religion to integrate the middle eastern peasantry (tribes, slaves, women) into the pagan pantheon and therefore raise their status to equality in contribution to civilization, and therefore worthy of respect non-existent in the pagan hierarchy that treated them as undomesticated animals, and therefore would no longer be treated as barbarians.

The use of this religion as an institution of warfare with which to keep the peasantry ignorant and subservient on one h and, but to undermine the aristocracy through social construction, resistance, and usurpation of power by numbers, just as the marxists-neo-marxists-postmodernists-feminists (jews in this age as in the last) have used immigration, and undermining the aristocratic civilization of the west for the SECOND TIME.

So no I don’t give the church credit for the scraps of good that would take place even under the most horridly backward, ignorance producing, and parasitic means of government over the people, trying to reduce them to middle eastern barbarism as a good.

Instead i compare what could have been without the church and that means the industrial revolution and a thousand years of ignorance poverty starvation disease and suffering would have been avoided if not for the ignorance-production of the semitic church, and instead, the continuation of the stoic and epicurean and philosophical, and mathematical, and legal, and commercial institutions of the europeans.

Myth, Ritual, Oath, Feast, Celebration by Festival, Sport, Theater, Story) (the animal celebration of the rewards of the hunt around the fire) organized into Religion, and some kind of

The church destroyed jesus’ message of love and the opportunity of the ancient world to create harmony by the jewish conversion of it into a political weapon of despotic rule, not harmonious like the egyptians, or justificationary like the babylonians, but despotic and hostile and undermining like the jews and arabs.

So no. Jesus was the feminine alternative to Achilles – a hero of the poor. And Paul and the rest of the jews turned it into a religion of rebellion and destruction against rome, just as the muslims exacerbated the problem by converting it to a religion of conquest, destruction, and devolution into feminine barbarism – reversing gods law of transcendence of man.