Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • “Melania Trump has more children than the leaders of Germany, France, England an

    –“Melania Trump has more children than the leaders of Germany, France, England and Italy combined.”– Steve Pender

    The leaders of genocide are genocidal. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 13:37:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/24/bombshell-fec-records-indicate-hillary-campaign-illegally-laundered-84-million/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-24 19:04:00 UTC

  • This is where we all will end up. We need to act

    This is where we all will end up. We need to act.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-24 18:16:00 UTC

  • RT @Outsideness: @LeftoidMind @KalishJantzen “A world of free movement” would be

    RT @Outsideness: @LeftoidMind @KalishJantzen “A world of free movement” would be South Africa scaled-up to planetary size. So rather less t…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-24 09:46:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/988715784938639360

  • Retweeted Outsideness (@Outsideness): @LeftoidMind @KalishJantzen “A world of fr

    Retweeted Outsideness (@Outsideness):

    @LeftoidMind @KalishJantzen “A world of free movement” would be South Africa scaled-up to planetary size. So rather less than “$78 trillion richer” after the politics reached equilibrium.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-24 05:46:00 UTC

  • The Impossibility of Anarchy

    THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF ANARCHY 1) You can only create a polity with liberty using violence, and 2) economic necessity dictates that you can only produce sufficient violence to repel competitors with sufficient wealth, and; 3) you can only produce sufficient wealth with commons. 4) And you can only produce commons if people cannot defect from payment for those commons in both service (fighting) and resources. In other words: You can’t produce a libertarian polity that can survive market competition for territory with other polities, which is why there have never existed such polities except on the frontier of a state powerful enough to prohibit competitors to the territory, yet insufficient wealth to settle, police, govern, and provide infrastructure for it. Hence why the only examples of antyng approaching a libertarian fantasy are borderlands of empires. We develop taxation and governments to preserve our interests. The question is not whether we need taxes (fees), and governments(production of commons), but how to prevent their misuse. And in the prevention of misuse since we rarely know the right answer, and we are all cognitively biased, the only solution is markets in the production of commons.

  • The Impossibility of Anarchy

    THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF ANARCHY 1) You can only create a polity with liberty using violence, and 2) economic necessity dictates that you can only produce sufficient violence to repel competitors with sufficient wealth, and; 3) you can only produce sufficient wealth with commons. 4) And you can only produce commons if people cannot defect from payment for those commons in both service (fighting) and resources. In other words: You can’t produce a libertarian polity that can survive market competition for territory with other polities, which is why there have never existed such polities except on the frontier of a state powerful enough to prohibit competitors to the territory, yet insufficient wealth to settle, police, govern, and provide infrastructure for it. Hence why the only examples of antyng approaching a libertarian fantasy are borderlands of empires. We develop taxation and governments to preserve our interests. The question is not whether we need taxes (fees), and governments(production of commons), but how to prevent their misuse. And in the prevention of misuse since we rarely know the right answer, and we are all cognitively biased, the only solution is markets in the production of commons.

  • Listen. I am gonna go to my grave railing against the charades of (((libertarian

    Listen. I am gonna go to my grave railing against the charades of (((libertarianism, communism, and neoconservatism))) and advocating +++Sovereignty, Rule of Law, and Market Government+++ instead.

    The fact that people could be fooled by the fallacy of capitalism vs communism instead of rule of law vs rule of discretion is just evidence of how susceptible people are to framing.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 12:25:00 UTC

  • THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF ANARCHY 1) You can only create a polity with liberty using

    THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF ANARCHY

    1) You can only create a polity with liberty using violence, and

    2) economic necessity dictates that you can only produce sufficient violence to repel competitors with sufficient wealth, and;

    3) you can only produce sufficient wealth with commons.

    4) And you can only produce commons if people cannot defect from payment for those commons in both service (fighting) and resources.

    In other words:

    You can’t produce a libertarian polity that can survive market competition for territory with other polities, which is why there have never existed such polities except on the frontier of a state powerful enough to prohibit competitors to the territory, yet insufficient wealth to settle, police, govern, and provide infrastructure for it.

    Hence why the only examples of antyng approaching a libertarian fantasy are borderlands of empires.

    We develop taxation and governments to preserve our interests. The question is not whether we need taxes (fees), and governments(production of commons), but how to prevent their misuse.

    And in the prevention of misuse since we rarely know the right answer, and we are all cognitively biased, the only solution is markets in the production of commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 11:47:00 UTC

  • Roughly speaking, about 1/4 of people should go through STEM university training

    Roughly speaking, about 1/4 of people should go through STEM university training, and the rest should graduate high school able to work.

    The problem is that we teach nonsense after 6th grade. Roughly half of all educational hours are wasted.

    In my understanding we should enter people into the workforce between 12 and 14 given their rate of maturity, and teach life tools a few hours a day: money, accounting, economics, basic contracts. In fact, it’s very interesting that we teach all the sciences OTHER than the one that is most important: COOPERATION. Instead of cooperation we teach SUBMISSION.

    If we were to do this we would extend work lives, and reverse infantilization, as well as all but eliminate the difficulty entering the work force. We would have vast programs of teaching-in-the-workplace at very low wages, and produce the highest skilled people in the world.

    We could have fully socialized people, a more competente work force, have children in our late teens and twenties, and far lower costs.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:52:00 UTC