Um. Fascism = Monopoly. Everyone wants a monopoly – whether left right or center. The west however rose at its unprecedented pace in the ancient and modern worlds, under tripartism and markets for cooperation, while maintaining underclass eugenics (suppression). So basically fascism won. The ‘examples’ being set for the rest of the world are china, russia and saudi arabia – a trend in the research that was identified in the 90’s. Democracy in the 19th and 20th and the French Revolution’s counter-empiricism will be, as in the ancient world, remembered as nothing more than a revolt made possible by temporary excesses in income made possible by european technological superiority and the use of it in colonization. In less than a century that competitive advantage (capital) has been spent down, and the world is dividing again into large caste systems (india, south america, the muslim world) and nationalisms (china, japan, south korea). With the west by fully accidental means, choosing to follow india, south america, and the levant, into permanent class warfare.
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
Fascism Won. Eugenicists Were Right.
Um. Fascism = Monopoly. Everyone wants a monopoly – whether left right or center. The west however rose at its unprecedented pace in the ancient and modern worlds, under tripartism and markets for cooperation, while maintaining underclass eugenics (suppression). So basically fascism won. The ‘examples’ being set for the rest of the world are china, russia and saudi arabia – a trend in the research that was identified in the 90’s. Democracy in the 19th and 20th and the French Revolution’s counter-empiricism will be, as in the ancient world, remembered as nothing more than a revolt made possible by temporary excesses in income made possible by european technological superiority and the use of it in colonization. In less than a century that competitive advantage (capital) has been spent down, and the world is dividing again into large caste systems (india, south america, the muslim world) and nationalisms (china, japan, south korea). With the west by fully accidental means, choosing to follow india, south america, and the levant, into permanent class warfare.
-
Curt Doolittle Um. Fascism = Monopoly. Everyone wants a monopoly – whether left
Curt Doolittle Um. Fascism = Monopoly. Everyone wants a monopoly – whether left right or center. THe west however rose at its unprecedented pace in the ancient and modern worlds, under tripartism and markets for cooperation, while maintaining underclass eugenics (suppression). So basically fascism won. The ‘examples’ being set for the rest of the world are china, russia and saudi arabia – a trend in the research that was identified in the 90’s. Democracy in the 19th and 20th and the French Revolution’s counter-empiricism will be, as in the ancient world, remembered as nothing more than a revolt made possible by temporary excesses in income made possible by european technological superiority and the use of it in colonization. In less than a century that competitive advantage (capital) has been spent down, and the world is dividing again into large caste systems (india, south america, the muslim world) and nationalisms (china, japan, south korea). With the west by fully accidental means, choosing to follow india, south america, and the levant, into permanent class warfare.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-20 10:27:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/30742960_10156298896447264_26276020
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/30742960_10156298896447264_2627602090511302656_n_10156298896437264.jpg (from a friend, from elsewhere)Cam PyperRevolutionary, if your timing is right.Apr 19, 2018 11:07pmJames HalladayI wish you made more videos. Your perspective is so insightfulApr 20, 2018 6:12amCurt Doolittlesoon…Apr 20, 2018 8:14amDaniel Roland Anderson@[741197263:2048:Curt Doolittle]
Don’t you dare Robert Jordan us.Apr 21, 2018 1:22am(from a friend, from elsewhere)
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 19:59:00 UTC
-
Forms of Decidability (government) at Different Scales
Capitalism should be applied to strangers on a macro scale. (Market Relations) Socialism should be applied on normative organizational scale. (Normative Relations) Communalism should be applied with “family” on a micro scale. (Kin Relations) And Fascism should be applied to all in times of war. (Because only those methods of decision are available at each scale.) Pure capitalists get it wrong because they betray their immediate in-groups. Pure communists get it wrong because one in-group is impossible, and force others to betray in-groups. (original version by Justin Odiogn) Apr 19, 2018 8:49am
-
Forms of Decidability (government) at Different Scales
Capitalism should be applied to strangers on a macro scale. (Market Relations) Socialism should be applied on normative organizational scale. (Normative Relations) Communalism should be applied with “family” on a micro scale. (Kin Relations) And Fascism should be applied to all in times of war. (Because only those methods of decision are available at each scale.) Pure capitalists get it wrong because they betray their immediate in-groups. Pure communists get it wrong because one in-group is impossible, and force others to betray in-groups. (original version by Justin Odiogn) Apr 19, 2018 8:49am
-
Unalterable. (Deterministic)
International trade is almost entirely capitalist, and reciprocal – they have no choice. Contrary to propaganda, all states are largely social democratic – they have no choice. Contrary to image, businesses are largely socialist internally – they have no choice. As expected, all families are communist – they have no choice. Because each demands what is necessary to maintain the balance between available information, possible incentives, probable means and desired ends. However when we try to misapply decidability from one condition to the other, we do so in opposition to the available information, available incentives, possible means, and desired ends. This is not alterable.
-
Unalterable. (Deterministic)
International trade is almost entirely capitalist, and reciprocal – they have no choice. Contrary to propaganda, all states are largely social democratic – they have no choice. Contrary to image, businesses are largely socialist internally – they have no choice. As expected, all families are communist – they have no choice. Because each demands what is necessary to maintain the balance between available information, possible incentives, probable means and desired ends. However when we try to misapply decidability from one condition to the other, we do so in opposition to the available information, available incentives, possible means, and desired ends. This is not alterable.
-
Some Of Us Must Be Generals
Some people bail water to relieve the pressure of the flood. Some people scribe a crack in the dam and let the sheer weight of the water do its work. Almost all people on the right are the former kind, and I am the latter. Western civilization unconsciously, out of habit, solves problems early, honestly, directly, and openly – as is necessary among a militia of peers. However, this is not how one conducts war. A general does not seek valor, heroism, and sacrifice as much as indirection, asymmetry of conditions, and supply lines, during which valor, sacrifice, and heroism are obtained at least expense. I’ve been criticized for my contra-populism for years and the reason is quite simple – populists bail water of immediacy, and generals simply identify all the dams, and where to scribe them so they break of their own accord, with the deluge doing the hard labor while we watch the destruction. We have to do very little because the tolerance for non kin is the product of wealth and order. If we remove the wealth and order, then the tolerance, like the dam will end, and the natural pressure of the conflict will produce deterministic ends. The enemy always has the numbers. We did not conquer and rule the world because of our numbers, or our valor, but our social order, and our technology.
-
Some Of Us Must Be Generals
Some people bail water to relieve the pressure of the flood. Some people scribe a crack in the dam and let the sheer weight of the water do its work. Almost all people on the right are the former kind, and I am the latter. Western civilization unconsciously, out of habit, solves problems early, honestly, directly, and openly – as is necessary among a militia of peers. However, this is not how one conducts war. A general does not seek valor, heroism, and sacrifice as much as indirection, asymmetry of conditions, and supply lines, during which valor, sacrifice, and heroism are obtained at least expense. I’ve been criticized for my contra-populism for years and the reason is quite simple – populists bail water of immediacy, and generals simply identify all the dams, and where to scribe them so they break of their own accord, with the deluge doing the hard labor while we watch the destruction. We have to do very little because the tolerance for non kin is the product of wealth and order. If we remove the wealth and order, then the tolerance, like the dam will end, and the natural pressure of the conflict will produce deterministic ends. The enemy always has the numbers. We did not conquer and rule the world because of our numbers, or our valor, but our social order, and our technology.