I SUPPORT UKRAINE FOR PERSONAL REASONS TOO I do my job counter-signaling russian propaganda, and supporting the people I care for, in the country I call home, and in which I base my little organization. If you don’t like it I”m sorry, but it is not just part of my job, not just my conviction, but the means by which I can pay back a little for everything Ukraine has done for me. People I care about suffer every day that Russia interferes with their escape from russian conquest. I want a free, conservative, familial intermarium where the people of eastern europe like the people of germanic europe, like the people of catholic europe, fulfill their cultural ambitions. No monopolies anywhere but reciprocity. Let a thousand nations bloom.
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
“If nationalism is the promotion of the national interest, then its principles a
—“If nationalism is the promotion of the national interest, then its principles are by this definition universal.”—Claire Khaw
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 16:48:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/31403464_10156316186092264_62118720
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/31403464_10156316186092264_621187201694171136_o_10156316186082264.jpg MAP WORLD OIL RESERVESRolo TomasiIf the middle east didn’t have oil, it would be AfghanistanApr 27, 2018 3:51pmChris McNo oil in Texas? LolApr 27, 2018 3:53pmDaniel VidosGood content. Do you have similar map with sweet water?Apr 27, 2018 3:56pmRoy McCoolChina already trying to expand into the south China sea for this reason with some limited success.Apr 27, 2018 3:58pmJustin BurgerTexas and Alaska have large amounts…. Alaska especially.Apr 27, 2018 4:41pmBjorn MoritzIf this map is true, how is America oil independent now?Apr 27, 2018 5:04pmCurt Doolittleit just doesn’t include usa deposits, I don’t know whyApr 27, 2018 5:18pmMichael CarbonaroThomas Sowell’s chapter on “Investments” in his book “Basic Economics” goes into this briefly, but quite well. I forget which chapter, but it should be page 300 or so.Apr 27, 2018 5:21pmJC TrottSo we don’t accidentally invade ourselves.Apr 27, 2018 5:57pmCurt Doolittleomg that’s good. ;)Apr 27, 2018 6:09pmStephen KlostermeierI was gonna say.. The US has massive deposits.
And is that Antartica?Apr 27, 2018 6:32pmJack HarmsThis map is very badApr 27, 2018 7:34pmDarren HowellWonder how long before the antarctic treaty wars start?Apr 27, 2018 8:19pmHusam CormackThis can’t be right. Jordan is painted red when it actually has 0 oil.Apr 27, 2018 11:59pmVivek NaDoes this take into account the recent oil reserves discovered in the Mid east and the US shale stuff?Apr 28, 2018 4:24amEthan Ethanwow, that’s a lot of places to invadeApr 30, 2018 8:31pmMAP WORLD OIL RESERVES
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 15:33:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 13:27:00 UTC
-
NORTH KOREA Now hopefully we can get out of South Korea. Then out of germany. Th
NORTH KOREA
Now hopefully we can get out of South Korea. Then out of germany. Then out of italy. Then destroy iran’s regime. Then bring everyone home.
39,000 troops stationed in Japan,
38,000 troops in Hawaii
34,000 troops in germany
23,500 troops in south korea
12,457 troops in Italy
9,123 troops in United Kingdom
3,905 troops in Spain. (??? this is weird)
Bahrain 7,193
Kuwait 2,082
Turkey 1,851
UA Emirates 1,099
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 12:38:00 UTC
-
We can’t staff our military because americans are obese. The russians can’t staf
We can’t staff our military because americans are obese. The russians can’t staff their military because of alcohol, conscription and the economy. Chechens and russian special forces are equal to our best. But the army is ” a bunch of drunks, with no training, no discipline”
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 11:55:00 UTC
-
THE GREAT AMERICAN LIE by Bill Joslin and Curt Doolittle by Bill Joslin: Jeffers
THE GREAT AMERICAN LIE
by Bill Joslin and Curt Doolittle
by Bill Joslin:
Jefferson lied.
The American sentiment of democracy and it’s failure to ensure it’s value is passed down stems from good and true ideas being propted-up by lies.
Stop lying!
You are ruled (democracy is NOT the will of the.people) and voting prevents the necessity for violent revolution to purify power.
A generation before, in England, the noble franchise was expanded to all land holders for one reason only – one last peaceful step before violent revolution.
American founding fathers were the grandchildren of UK parliamentarians who lost their moral footing due to Cromwell.
The founding fathers didn’t innovate these ideas as much as refined the argumentation for granddaddy’s wisdom. And they appealed to.morality and religion to do so.
Now it is failing. Not because the ideas were wrong, but rather because the argumentation was baseless.
Fix this.
(Curt has. so advocate for his work to correct your way of life)
——-
by Curt Doolittle
This argument has been stated as:
1) The value of democracy is limited to the the via-negativa: throwing the corrupt out (disbanding parliament) by peaceful means of transition.
2) A republic can choose priorities among a people with common interests, but only markets can choose preferences between people with dissimilar interests.
3) Majoritarian democracy serves as a monopoly that only increases frustrations between people with dissimilar intersets, as the majority gradually oppresses the minority.
4) The English “aristocracy of everyone” was merely an excuse for seizing political power from the aristocracy by forcing a supermajority, rather than constructing an exchange, and adding even lower houses of parliament. they created a monopoly from a market between the classes.
5) The americans created a constitution of natural law by using a house of equal regional aristocracy(senate), and proportional regional property owners (middle class house), only exacerbating the problem. This experiment was a ‘third way’ that sought to restore anglo saxon rule of law (contractualism) among the militia.
6) The americans iteratively bypassed the state aristocracies by direct voting for the senate, and extended enfranchisement rather than creating a single house. in this sense they attempted to create a monopoly (homogeneous) democracy with the senate mediating differences between states. This served to transfer power to the federal government and away from the states. had this power been limited to exclude all normative, traditional, familial behavior that would have enabled insurer of last resort functions, but instead large immigrant states dominated the others, creating the past and current conflicts.
7) All of these factors violate the anglo < germanic < aryan reason for european historical successes, which were dependent upon the preservation of individual sovereignty under natural law of tort (property), and individual warranty through service and economic liability, and the use of markets in everything for the purpose of decidability.
8) The family does scale. There is no limit to Militia <- Military <-King-> judiciary -> parliament(thang) -> people, as long as voluntary association, disassociation are available.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 10:18:00 UTC
-
The Possibility of an American Revolution
THE POSSIBILITY OF AMERICAN REVOLUTION Replying to @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg 1) While historically a small percentage (under 3%) of unwed males have been the cause for most revolutions (men being a surplus resource of violence like any other resource) it is trivial at this point in time for very small numbers to bring an end to the american government. 2) In fact I cannot think of a time in history where such a revolution would be so trivially brought about. Not just because of a small number of men, but because, like the fall of the roman empire, the basis of our civilization (military service and common law) has been undermined and the common man married or not are in rebellious mood. 3) In the ancient world, judaism was invented to resist, christianity to subvert, then islam used to conquer, and destroy all the great civilizations of the ancient world, creating the Abrahamic Dark Ages. So immigration of hostiles, the conversion of our women and underclass…. 4) Localized rebellion, invasion, the costs of land vs marine policing, the plagues, and the islamic conquest of mediterranean and indian ocean trade, combined with a surplus of males able to retreat into deserts, destroyed every single great civilization between 100 and 1200 … 5) … with the Fresh Reserves of newly islamicized Turks, assisted by plague. accomplishing what the exhausted arabs could not in 1453. It took until 1683 to exhaust the Turks, who could not govern the arabs either. So we have fought islam for 1400 years. 6) And so far, only China, Japan, and Korea, on one end, and America on the other, have resisted the Muslim Conquests. Today muslims are accomplishing through migration what they could not achieve through martial means. It’s just numbers. 7) So imagine something as simple as cutting off EBT (welfare payments) to urban centers by serial overloading (shorting) of power lines, and cutting of transmission lines. That is one of only a hundred similar techniques that do not require armed conflict so much as “just letting the pressure of the dam, do its work”.
-
The Possibility of an American Revolution
THE POSSIBILITY OF AMERICAN REVOLUTION Replying to @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg 1) While historically a small percentage (under 3%) of unwed males have been the cause for most revolutions (men being a surplus resource of violence like any other resource) it is trivial at this point in time for very small numbers to bring an end to the american government. 2) In fact I cannot think of a time in history where such a revolution would be so trivially brought about. Not just because of a small number of men, but because, like the fall of the roman empire, the basis of our civilization (military service and common law) has been undermined and the common man married or not are in rebellious mood. 3) In the ancient world, judaism was invented to resist, christianity to subvert, then islam used to conquer, and destroy all the great civilizations of the ancient world, creating the Abrahamic Dark Ages. So immigration of hostiles, the conversion of our women and underclass…. 4) Localized rebellion, invasion, the costs of land vs marine policing, the plagues, and the islamic conquest of mediterranean and indian ocean trade, combined with a surplus of males able to retreat into deserts, destroyed every single great civilization between 100 and 1200 … 5) … with the Fresh Reserves of newly islamicized Turks, assisted by plague. accomplishing what the exhausted arabs could not in 1453. It took until 1683 to exhaust the Turks, who could not govern the arabs either. So we have fought islam for 1400 years. 6) And so far, only China, Japan, and Korea, on one end, and America on the other, have resisted the Muslim Conquests. Today muslims are accomplishing through migration what they could not achieve through martial means. It’s just numbers. 7) So imagine something as simple as cutting off EBT (welfare payments) to urban centers by serial overloading (shorting) of power lines, and cutting of transmission lines. That is one of only a hundred similar techniques that do not require armed conflict so much as “just letting the pressure of the dam, do its work”.
-
The Experiment Failed.
–“I never understood how letting everyone vote is a good thing”–Peter Sorrentino Well, I think originally jefferson’s idea was that being as inclusive as possible decreased the chances of concentrating power. Universal white males in 1856 White women in 1920 Minorities in 1965. So you can see what happens rather rapidly. The experiment has been a failure. We just need to rule. Return to rule for money and profit. 😉 Militia > King (General) > Judge > Sheriff > Family > Individual.