Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • The Experiment Failed.

    –“I never understood how letting everyone vote is a good thing”–Peter Sorrentino Well, I think originally jefferson’s idea was that being as inclusive as possible decreased the chances of concentrating power. Universal white males in 1856 White women in 1920 Minorities in 1965. So you can see what happens rather rapidly. The experiment has been a failure. We just need to rule. Return to rule for money and profit. 😉 Militia > King (General) > Judge > Sheriff > Family > Individual.

  • 7) So imagine something as simple as cutting off EBT (welfare payments) to urban

    7) So imagine something as simple as cutting off EBT (welfare payments) to urban centers by serial overloading (shorting) of power lines, and cutting of transmission lines. That is one of only a hundred similar techniques that do not require armed conflict.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 17:16:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989553937157181440

    Reply addressees: @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989553146035933184


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg 6) And so far, only China, Japan, and Korea, on one end, and America on the other, have resisted the Muslim Conquests. Today muslims are accomplishing through migration what they could not achieve through martial means. It’s just numbers.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/989553146035933184


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg 6) And so far, only China, Japan, and Korea, on one end, and America on the other, have resisted the Muslim Conquests. Today muslims are accomplishing through migration what they could not achieve through martial means. It’s just numbers.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/989553146035933184

  • 2) In fact I cannot think of a time in history where such a revolution would be

    2) In fact I cannot think of a time in history where such a revolution would be so trivially brought about. Not just because of a small number of men, but because, like the fall of the roman empire, the basis of our civilization (military service and common law) has be undermined


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 17:04:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989550705353592837

    Reply addressees: @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989550338108739584


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg 1) While historically a small percentage (under 3%) of unwed males have been the cause for most revolutions (men being a surplus resource of violence like any other resource) it is trivial at this point in time for very small numbers to bring an end to the american government.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/989550338108739584


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg 1) While historically a small percentage (under 3%) of unwed males have been the cause for most revolutions (men being a surplus resource of violence like any other resource) it is trivial at this point in time for very small numbers to bring an end to the american government.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/989550338108739584

  • 1) While historically a small percentage (under 3%) of unwed males have been the

    1) While historically a small percentage (under 3%) of unwed males have been the cause for most revolutions (men being a surplus resource of violence like any other resource) it is trivial at this point in time for very small numbers to bring an end to the american government.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 17:02:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989550338108739584

    Reply addressees: @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989549419107405824


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989549419107405824

  • “I never understood how letting everyone vote is a good thing”–Peter Sorrentino

    –“I never understood how letting everyone vote is a good thing”–Peter Sorrentino

    Well, I think originally jefferson’s idea was that being as inclusive as possible decreased the chances of concentrating power.

    Universal white males in 1856

    White women in 1920

    Minorities in 1965.

    So you can see what happens rather rapidly.

    The experiment has been a failure.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 16:03:00 UTC

  • We just need to rule. The experiment failed. Return to rule for money and profit

    We just need to rule. The experiment failed.

    Return to rule for money and profit. 😉

    Militia > King (General) > Judge > Sheriff > Family > Individual.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 15:41:00 UTC

  • Nassim: d) So my read is the law is taught as a craft (practiced) and the ‘liber

    Nassim: d) So my read is the law is taught as a craft (practiced) and the ‘liberal arts” are taught as doctrines, and we are wasting a phenomenal amount of money not separating Techne(craft), Religion(obedience), and Law(Rule). Meaning the problem is the Academy (secular church).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 14:40:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989514645508706304

    Reply addressees: @nntaleb @bryan_caplan @tylercowen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989513856564256768


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @nntaleb @bryan_caplan @tylercowen Nassim: c) And so, my reading of history, is that the aristocracy was taught to rule (meaning decide, not direct), and the nobility to govern (direct), and labor to obey. (Indo European Tripartism). Otherwise I’m certain your positioning of the ‘Doctrine’ vs ‘Techne’ is correct.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/989513856564256768


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @nntaleb @bryan_caplan @tylercowen Nassim: c) And so, my reading of history, is that the aristocracy was taught to rule (meaning decide, not direct), and the nobility to govern (direct), and labor to obey. (Indo European Tripartism). Otherwise I’m certain your positioning of the ‘Doctrine’ vs ‘Techne’ is correct.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/989513856564256768

  • THE POSSIBILITY OF AMERICAN REVOLUTION Replying to @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg

    THE POSSIBILITY OF AMERICAN REVOLUTION

    Replying to @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg

    1) While historically a small percentage (under 3%) of unwed males have been the cause for most revolutions (men being a surplus resource of violence like any other resource) it is trivial at this point in time for very small numbers to bring an end to the american government.

    2) In fact I cannot think of a time in history where such a revolution would be so trivially brought about. Not just because of a small number of men, but because, like the fall of the roman empire, the basis of our civilization (military service and common law) has been undermined and the common man married or not are in rebellious mood.

    3) In the ancient world, judaism was invented to resist, christianity to subvert, then islam used to conquer, and destroy all the great civilizations of the ancient world, creating the Abrahamic Dark Ages. So immigration of hostiles, the conversion of our women and underclass….

    4) Localized rebellion, invasion, the costs of land vs marine policing, the plagues, and the islamic conquest of mediterranean and indian ocean trade, combined with a surplus of males able to retreat into deserts, destroyed every single great civilization between 100 and 1200 …

    5) … with the Fresh Reserves of newly islamicized Turks, assisted by plague. accomplishing what the exhausted arabs could not in 1453. It took until 1683 to exhaust the Turks, who could not govern the arabs either. So we have fought islam for 1400 years.

    6) And so far, only China, Japan, and Korea, on one end, and America on the other, have resisted the Muslim Conquests. Today muslims are accomplishing through migration what they could not achieve through martial means. It’s just numbers.

    7) So imagine something as simple as cutting off EBT (welfare payments) to urban centers by serial overloading (shorting) of power lines, and cutting of transmission lines. That is one of only a hundred similar techniques that do not require armed conflict so much as “just letting the pressure of the dam, do its work”.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 13:16:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) 1 – Russians murdered millions of ukrainians, ukrainians didn’t

    (from elsewhere)

    1 – Russians murdered millions of ukrainians, ukrainians didn’t murder millions of russians.

    2 – Russians invaded ukraine with ‘little green men’, ukraine didn’t invade russia.

    3 – Ukrainians west of the Dnieper were prosperous, peaceful, members of the Austrian and Polish empires, and had their assets taken, their property taken, the graves despoiled, their traditions and culture destroyed, by russians, but ukrainians didn’t do that to russians.

    4 – Russians (The Kingdom of Muscovy) conquered east ukrainians (today’s southern russians) and converted them to russian speakers, or ‘resettled them’. Ukrainians didn’t do that to russians. (Most russians do not understand that southern russians spoke ukrainian.)

    5 – Russians relocated ethnic russians to eastern european lands in order to put (underclass) people who could easily be ruled (who had been sefs just one or two generations before), into lands with middle classes (who could not be easily ruled) and destroyed those middle classes. Ukrainians didn’t do that to russians.

    6 – Russians used secret police and prisons to ‘make people disappear, and nearly everyone in ukraine today has a relative in living memory who was ‘made to disappear’. Ukrainian’s didn’t do that to russians.

    7 – Russians set eastern europe back a century, failed, and caused devastation across the former (((soviet))) empire, and have neither solved the problem of ukrainian oligarchs, but put the people into greater submission to them.

    8 – Russians paid 200 uah to poor people to vote for Yanukovych and then paid Yanukovych to undermine the ukrainian military so that the country could be easily conquered – ukrainians didn’t undermine russians so that they could be easily conquered, or pay to interfere in their elections. (russians did that themselves).

    9 – Ukrainians are governed by the Oligarchs (gangsters) who are jewish and russian, and the government is just a proxy for the corruption. Ukrainians want to follow the poles into peaceful transparent democracy, but russians want to force ukrainians into remote russian corruption instead of Intermarium (polish-ukrainian) conservative democracy. (Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic are slowly developing the Intermarium, and Ukraine will very likely join them as soon as poland decides to expand its military.

    10 – Ukrainians do not speak russian but ukrainian, just as poles do not speak ukrainian. Ukrainians and poles, the baltics, and the Old Europeans (Southern Slavs) are culturally european, and russians were conquered by and then conquered their mongol rulers – and the mongolian ethics. Muscovites and Kievans are only distant relations. Muscovites were the barbarians that conquered kiev the same way that the mongols had.

    Because I understand russian struggles, love russian culture, and respect russian people, and very much understand that russia is right to resist democracy and the (((disease))) of ‘progressivness’ I am a russophile by any measure.

    But until russians understand that their ‘mythos’ was as bad as the mongols, and that the germans were in the right to oppose the soviets, and that russia did far worse to themselves and the world than the germans ever imagined doing, then this russian fantasy will continue.

    Europe ends at the Dnieper until russians learn to speak the truth no matter what the consequences, because that is what separates the ‘naive’ west, from the ‘cruel and dishonest’ east.

    Clean your own dirty house first. Then the world will stop trying to contain you.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 08:57:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.fastcompany.com/40563225/chinas-terrifying-social-credit-surveillance-system-is-expandinghttps://www.fastcompany.com/40563225/chinas-terrifying-social-credit-surveillance-system-is-expanding


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 19:59:00 UTC