Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • Absolutism

    —“Absolutism asserts a preference as a good and then justifies that preference with facts (fits the world around the individual). Scientific Law of Tort models the social world. With this knowledge, the polity asserts its good in the name of the state, and the individuals assert their will to power within those limits for fear of punishment.”—Nick Rosenthal

    (genius)

  • Absolutism

    —“Absolutism asserts a preference as a good and then justifies that preference with facts (fits the world around the individual). Scientific Law of Tort models the social world. With this knowledge, the polity asserts its good in the name of the state, and the individuals assert their will to power within those limits for fear of punishment.”—Nick Rosenthal

    (genius)

  • You are clearly our enemy, and have declared yourself so. As such we will not sh

    You are clearly our enemy, and have declared yourself so. As such we will not share with you. We may trade with you – if you have anything to trade. If you are an enemy, and we cannot trade with you, then there is only one choice remaining: war. And we revel in it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 17:07:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059130137210470401

  • Most of all free riding, parasitism, theft, fraud, as attempts to cover thefts s

    Most of all free riding, parasitism, theft, fraud, as attempts to cover thefts should be shamed, punished, and punished so severely that it is not repeated. I mean, that’s what the law is for. Criminalizing parasites on both the private and commons. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 16:14:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059116699411271682

    Reply addressees: @PRO__UNLIMITED @PopChassid

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059102835198038017

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059102835198038017

  • No no no. It’s that I make, we make, a full accounting of costs. And we suppress

    No no no. It’s that I make, we make, a full accounting of costs. And we suppress free riding, parasitism, fraud, duplicity, and dysgenia. LIke I said. You are thieves and we defend capital. Hyperconsumption, vs Anti Parasitism.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 16:13:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059116358506557442

    Reply addressees: @PRO__UNLIMITED @PopChassid

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059102835198038017

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059102835198038017

  • “Absolutism asserts a preference as a good and then justifies that preference wi

    —“Absolutism asserts a preference as a good and then justifies that preference with facts (fits the world around the individual). Scientific Law of Tort models the social world. With this knowledge, the polity asserts its good in the name of the state, and the individuals assert their will to power within those limits for fear of punishment.”—Nick Rosenthal

    (genius)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 13:14:00 UTC

  • Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploita

    Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpu), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 00:00:00 UTC

  • Short Course: Does Might Make Right (or Rights)?

    –“DOES MIGHT MAKE RIGHT? (IT MAKES RIGHTS)”–

    —“Hello Mr. Doolittle, what if might doesn’t make right? Any thoughts or previous writings?”— A Friend

    “Wrongs Exist. Right Is That Which Is Not Wrong.” propertarianism.com/2018/01/23/wrongs-exist-right-is-that-which-is-not-wrong/ Might makes rights. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/08/07/might-makes-rights/ “Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs: A Declaration” propertarianism.com/2016/11/02/might-makes-right-by-righting-wrongs-a-declaration/ “Violence and Virtue vs Morality and Fraud” propertarianism.com/2011/03/04/violence-and-virtue-vs-morality-and-fraud/ “The Virtue Of Violence” propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/the-virtue-of-violence/ “The Necessity, Virtue And Morality Of Organized Violence” propertarianism.com/2013/09/07/6480/ “Liberty And Violence” propertarianism.com/2012/03/01/liberty-and-violence/ “Violence Is A Beautiful Word” propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/violence-is-a-beautiful-word/

  • Short Course: Does Might Make Right (or Rights)?

    –“DOES MIGHT MAKE RIGHT? (IT MAKES RIGHTS)”–

    —“Hello Mr. Doolittle, what if might doesn’t make right? Any thoughts or previous writings?”— A Friend

    “Wrongs Exist. Right Is That Which Is Not Wrong.” propertarianism.com/2018/01/23/wrongs-exist-right-is-that-which-is-not-wrong/ Might makes rights. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/08/07/might-makes-rights/ “Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs: A Declaration” propertarianism.com/2016/11/02/might-makes-right-by-righting-wrongs-a-declaration/ “Violence and Virtue vs Morality and Fraud” propertarianism.com/2011/03/04/violence-and-virtue-vs-morality-and-fraud/ “The Virtue Of Violence” propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/the-virtue-of-violence/ “The Necessity, Virtue And Morality Of Organized Violence” propertarianism.com/2013/09/07/6480/ “Liberty And Violence” propertarianism.com/2012/03/01/liberty-and-violence/ “Violence Is A Beautiful Word” propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/violence-is-a-beautiful-word/

  • MIGHT MAKE RIGHT? (IT MAKES RIGHTS)”– —“Hello Mr. Doolittle, what if might do

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/08/07/might-makes-rights/–“DOES MIGHT MAKE RIGHT? (IT MAKES RIGHTS)”–

    —“Hello Mr. Doolittle, what if might doesn’t make right?

    Any thoughts or previous writings?”— A Friend

    “Wrongs Exist. Right Is That Which Is Not Wrong.”

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/01/23/wrongs-exist-right-is-that-which-is-not-wrong/

    “Might makes rights.”

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/08/07/might-makes-rights/

    “Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs – A Declaration”

    https://propertarianism.com/2016/11/02/might-makes-right-by-righting-wrongs-a-declaration/

    “Violence and Virtue vs Morality and Fraud”

    https://propertarianism.com/2011/03/04/violence-and-virtue-vs-morality-and-fraud/

    “The Virtue Of Violence”

    https://propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/the-virtue-of-violence/

    “The Necessity, Virtue And Morality Of Organized Violence”

    https://propertarianism.com/2013/09/07/6480/

    “Liberty And Violence”

    https://propertarianism.com/2012/03/01/liberty-and-violence/

    “Violence Is A Beautiful Word”

    https://propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/violence-is-a-beautiful-word/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 16:48:00 UTC