Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • No, that is what a woman would say. A man says, “For my people – whatever it tak

    No, that is what a woman would say. A man says, “For my people – whatever it takes.” The only restitution for the reciprocity of displacement and genocide is displacement and genocide. This is morality, this is the Law.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 18:48:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060605113012772865

    Reply addressees: @readomain

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060599792315916288

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060599792315916288

  • Why is this complicated? Seriously. Disapproval, Shaming, Ridiculing in response

    Why is this complicated? Seriously.

    Disapproval, Shaming, Ridiculing in response to an attempted theft or fraud vs. Disapproval Shaming, Ridiculing in response to covering an attempted theft or fraud.

    Now, for some reason, it’s floating around, as DSR is a universal vs a particular: in other words, shaming people for a crime rather than for not letting them commit a crime.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 14:51:00 UTC

  • Why is this Complicated? Seirously?

    Why is this complicated? Seriously. Disapproval, Shaming, Ridiculing in response to an attempted theft or fraud vs. Disapproval Shaming, Ridiculing in response to covering an attempted theft or fraud. Now, for some reason, it’s floating around, as DSR is a universal vs a particular: in other words, shaming people for a crime rather than for not letting them commit a crime.

  • Why is this Complicated? Seirously?

    Why is this complicated? Seriously. Disapproval, Shaming, Ridiculing in response to an attempted theft or fraud vs. Disapproval Shaming, Ridiculing in response to covering an attempted theft or fraud. Now, for some reason, it’s floating around, as DSR is a universal vs a particular: in other words, shaming people for a crime rather than for not letting them commit a crime.

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45593333_10156761999032264_666568122

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45593333_10156761999032264_666568122496450560_o_10156761999022264.jpg Micah PezdirtzWe defend property (via violence). They cannot do that successfully, but will defend (via lies/pilpul/justification) their means of acquisition (parasitism)Nov 7, 2018, 10:24 AMRock MandjinnTruth is what gets results, but that’s a nice thought I guess.Nov 7, 2018, 11:07 AMPablo PerezPilpul?Nov 7, 2018, 1:10 PMCurt Doolittle(you are getting very, very good. congrats)Nov 7, 2018, 2:14 PMCurt Doolittlesophism: numerology, astrology, scriptural interpretation, textual interpretation, legal interpretation: the art of making excuses to justify a prior, using loading, framing, suggestion obscurantism, overloading, fictionalism, and deceit.Nov 7, 2018, 2:14 PMMicah PezdirtzPractice, practice, practiceNov 7, 2018, 2:19 PMMicah PezdirtzYou, Eli, Bill, Steve, James et al have been very good influencesNov 7, 2018, 2:21 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-07 10:08:00 UTC

  • enough of us must take responsibility such that we act to bring it about.

    I started out as a scientist performing research. I evolved into a jurist writing the law. Because of those efforts I wrote down the unwritten philosophy of the west. In doing so I advocate a set of possible choices that we would call a theory of politics today or a philosophy in yesteryear. I have an opinion in the construction of a system of education we call a religion within all of the above. To achieve them I use an ideology to market the set of solutions. So I have produced a complete system of thought entirely in the western group strategy captured in our law, which is our philosophy. But it is not a trivial system. It is a recipe for action. Not one of detachment that like all others limits our responsibility. Just the opposite. To obtain it enough of us must take responsibility such that we act to bring it about.

  • enough of us must take responsibility such that we act to bring it about.

    I started out as a scientist performing research. I evolved into a jurist writing the law. Because of those efforts I wrote down the unwritten philosophy of the west. In doing so I advocate a set of possible choices that we would call a theory of politics today or a philosophy in yesteryear. I have an opinion in the construction of a system of education we call a religion within all of the above. To achieve them I use an ideology to market the set of solutions. So I have produced a complete system of thought entirely in the western group strategy captured in our law, which is our philosophy. But it is not a trivial system. It is a recipe for action. Not one of detachment that like all others limits our responsibility. Just the opposite. To obtain it enough of us must take responsibility such that we act to bring it about.

  • No. Children < Pets < Domesticated < Predatory <-Pests <- Non-predatory. You can

    No. Children < Pets < Domesticated < Predatory <-Pests <- Non-predatory. You can’t hurt them, or kill them, unless they violate the constraints we place on pets and domesticated animals (a danger to humans) but that’s NEGATIVE rights of humans not POSITIVE rights of animals/AI.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 21:24:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059919369457885188

    Reply addressees: @KialoHQ

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059856218389393408

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Kialo

    Should human rights only apply to humans? A humanoid with strong AI could think and act like a human – but does that mean it should have the same rights? Join the debate on Kialo and have your say!https://t.co/kXP28kFkOl

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059856218389393408

  • “He who can destroy a thing, can control a thing.”- Frank Herbert —Those that

    –“He who can destroy a thing, can control a thing.”- Frank Herbert

    —Those that can control a thing, own a thing.—CD

    militia. the distributed dictatorship of sovereign men.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-05 22:11:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059568977679147010

  • Well, all debts that aren’t enforcible are perceived. that’s what morality consi

    –Well, all debts that aren’t enforcible are perceived. that’s what morality consists in.– CD

    –“I hear you though , debt placement is the difference you are going for?

    So when you pray you’re placing the debt on your own shoulders, cast a spell you are accounting for it.

    And also the difference is one was made legal by the church and one was made illegal by the church…..also most spellshapers have science (wonder is science), while prayershapers carry the burden of proof(wonder is Tao)”— James Lyons Sr. I

    (CD: well done)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-05 10:40:00 UTC