Restoration of Rule of Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, and constraining the people, the state, and it’s organs from even discussing, advocating or proposing a violation of the Rule of Law, without liability for sedition against our people, constitution, and civilization.
Reply addressees: @mchurchill22
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
Restoration of Rule of Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, and constraining the
-
What separates classical liberalism (anglo libertarianism), from the P-Constitut
What separates classical liberalism (anglo libertarianism), from the P-Constitution’s reformation: 1) a greater emphasis on the law limiting behavior; 2) less on the government as legislator; 3) more on the treasury as a sovereign investor,4) ending the false promise of equality.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 13:54:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272527850072129536
-
What separates classical liberalism (anglo libertarianism), from the P-Constitut
What separates classical liberalism (anglo libertarianism), from the P-Constitution’s reformation: 1) a greater emphasis on the law limiting behavior; 2) less on the government as legislator; 3) more on the treasury as a sovereign investor,4) ending the false promise of equality.
-
(It’s very, very, hard to get around the law in P-law, and the amendments under
(It’s very, very, hard to get around the law in P-law, and the amendments under P-law. And we create a market for their suppression in defense of the informational commons. And if we purge vehemently enough we will make their attempts untenable for a thousand years.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 11:26:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272490716426616832
Reply addressees: @UBKFrantisek @NoahRevoy @JulieBorowski @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272489771294695424
-
(It’s very, very, hard to get around the law in P-law, and the amendments under
(It’s very, very, hard to get around the law in P-law, and the amendments under P-law. And we create a market for their suppression in defense of the informational commons. And if we purge vehemently enough we will make their attempts untenable for a thousand years.)
Reply addressees: @UBKFrantisek @NoahRevoy @JulieBorowski @JohnMarkSays -
Correct. Our constitutional amendments restore collective punishment. “If you se
Correct. Our constitutional amendments restore collective punishment. “If you seek the benefits of the group you gain the liabilities of the group.”
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 11:19:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272489004668239872
Reply addressees: @SirJohn981 @Freesoilyeah
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272488520255447040
-
Correct. Our constitutional amendments restore collective punishment. “If you se
Correct. Our constitutional amendments restore collective punishment. “If you seek the benefits of the group you gain the liabilities of the group.”
Reply addressees: @SirJohn981 @Freesoilyeah -
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/104097906_306376510760509_5973982085
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/104097906_306376510760509_5973982085551804489_o_306376507427176.jpg CLOSING ARGUMENT IN BLOCK VS DOOLITTLECLOSING ARGUMENT IN BLOCK VS DOOLITTLE
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 08:38:00 UTC
-
If you have rule of law you will have moral markets. If you have (((free markets
If you have rule of law you will have moral markets. If you have (((free markets))) you do not have rule of law.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 07:53:00 UTC
-
Actually I don’t understand at all. I can’t even understand how you got to those
Actually I don’t understand at all. I can’t even understand how you got to those conclusions.
House for women means we know the sex of each voter and both women and men must agree for something to pass. There are ten ways of doing it. It’s just the least objectionable model.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-14 23:12:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272306059949019137
Reply addressees: @TheAcceleratio1 @PoshMePretty @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272295703474319362