RT @curtdoolittle: @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness I am a theorist (or what used to be called a philosopher) of scientific jurisprudence…
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
I am a theorist (or what used to be called a philosopher) of scientific jurispru
I am a theorist (or what used to be called a philosopher) of scientific jurisprudence (testimony, decidability). What motivates me? Saving western civilization from the second dark age, by repeat of the supernatural destruction of European Reason this time by pseudoscience.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 02:03:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271624265100660741
Reply addressees: @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271622921547583491
-
I am a theorist (or what used to be called a philosopher) of scientific jurispru
I am a theorist (or what used to be called a philosopher) of scientific jurisprudence (testimony, decidability). What motivates me? Saving western civilization from the second dark age, by repeat of the supernatural destruction of European Reason this time by pseudoscience.
Reply addressees: @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness -
From the Constitution, The Preamble, The Acts: (I think sh-t thru.)
From the Constitution, The Preamble, The Acts:
(I think sh-t thru.) https://t.co/FgJzQvyUhQ
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-12 13:08:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271429058484633607
Reply addressees: @Freeman75216446
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271422420537143296
-
From the Constitution, The Preamble, The Acts: (I think sh-t thru.)
From the Constitution, The Preamble, The Acts:
(I think sh-t thru.) https://t.co/FgJzQvyUhQ
Reply addressees: @Freeman75216446 -
I’ve been working on restoring our law, constitution, our culture, and preventin
I’ve been working on restoring our law, constitution, our culture, and preventing another Abrahamic dark age for almost twenty years. I was right about 2001, 08, 14, 17, and 20. The only thing I got wrong was how long it took for Pols realize China was conducting total war.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-12 03:03:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271277036519272450
Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein @bariweiss @thomaschattwill @kmele @ConceptualJames @EricRWeinstein @Ayishat_Akanbi @cvaldary @JonHaidt @MsMelChen @mcmoynihan @MattWelch @shadihamid @ZaidJilani @sullydish @jessesingal @kittypurrzog
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271276415359635457
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@BretWeinstein @bariweiss @thomaschattwill @kmele @ConceptualJames @EricRWeinstein @Ayishat_Akanbi @cvaldary @JonHaidt @MsMelChen @mcmoynihan @MattWelch @shadihamid @ZaidJilani @sullydish @jessesingal @kittypurrzog You weren’t early. Some of us were there in the 70’s and mapped it out.We created the Reagan revolution, and waited you (the left) out. The only reason we failed was not containing immigration. Otherwise the science and evidence has born out every false promise of the left (you).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1271276415359635457
-
I’ve been working on restoring our law, constitution, our culture, and preventin
I’ve been working on restoring our law, constitution, our culture, and preventing another Abrahamic dark age for almost twenty years. I was right about 2001, 08, 14, 17, and 20. The only thing I got wrong was how long it took for Pols realize China was conducting total war.
Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein @bariweiss @thomaschattwill @kmele @ConceptualJames @EricRWeinstein @Ayishat_Akanbi @cvaldary @JonHaidt @MsMelChen @mcmoynihan @MattWelch @shadihamid @ZaidJilani @sullydish @jessesingal @kittypurrzog -
Sure. I’ll debate an anarchist. What’s the topic?
My debate with any anarchist would consist of a series of asks for the content of a constitution (contract) of terms, how such a polity could be brought into being; and how it would survive competition for trade, population, territory, and control. This invariably results in the anarchist avoiding the questions, making false or wishful claims about human nature and behavior, and counterfactual claims about history. I don’t need ‘exposure’. So would this involve wasting my time, and require me to back a naive, intellectually dishonest opponent into a corner, thus only exacerbating my reputation as ‘a meanie’, or would, once (deterministically) falsified the opponent retreated into ‘well it would be nice’, or ‘one can hope at sometime it’s a possibility’?
-
No Anarchism Is a Fantasy, Rule of Law Is Not
No Anarchism Is a Fantasy, Rule of Law Is Not https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/11/no-anarchism-is-a-fantasy-rule-of-law-is-not/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-11 15:01:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271095227311362054
-
No Anarchism Is a Fantasy, Rule of Law Is Not
No Anarchism Is a Fantasy, Rule of Law Is Not https://t.co/EtuILBaYdv