Actually I don’t understand at all. I can’t even understand how you got to those conclusions.
House for women means we know the sex of each voter and both women and men must agree for something to pass. There are ten ways of doing it. It’s just the least objectionable model.
Reply addressees: @TheAcceleratio1 @PoshMePretty @JohnMarkSays
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
Actually I don’t understand at all. I can’t even understand how you got to those
-
I keep telling people. I do law: Accusation, Prosecution, and Judgment. I don’t
I keep telling people. I do law: Accusation, Prosecution, and Judgment.
I don’t do philosophy. It’s for wimps. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-14 17:51:00 UTC
-
P isn’t a religion. It’s not a philosophy. It’s not an ideology. It’s just the f
P isn’t a religion. It’s not a philosophy. It’s not an ideology. It’s just the formal science of jurisprudence, and in particular of testimonial truth. You don’t ‘join’ physics or ‘calculus’ or ‘cognitive science’. You either accept it or deny it.
Acceptance of science is a… https://t.co/j50AimRqS7
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 17:55:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271863774824235008
-
P isn’t a religion. It’s not a philosophy. It’s not an ideology. It’s just the f
P isn’t a religion. It’s not a philosophy. It’s not an ideology. It’s just the formal science of jurisprudence, and in particular of testimonial truth. You don’t ‘join’ physics or ‘calculus’ or ‘cognitive science’. You either accept it or deny it.
Acceptance of science is a… https://t.co/j50AimRqS7
-
I specialize in the science of jurisprudence, in particular testimonial (scienti
I specialize in the science of jurisprudence, in particular testimonial (scientific) truth, and the means by which lies are constructed, and the formal logic of testing for falsehoods, deceits, and irreciprocities.
I don’t err. Ever.
Her: https://t.co/ZvpxzM9F88
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 11:21:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271764585306095616
Reply addressees: @Lurker157724598 @TheWitn25016851
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271762870775185408
-
I specialize in the science of jurisprudence, in particular testimonial (scienti
I specialize in the science of jurisprudence, in particular testimonial (scientific) truth, and the means by which lies are constructed, and the formal logic of testing for falsehoods, deceits, and irreciprocities.
I don’t err. Ever.
Her: https://t.co/ZvpxzM9F88
Reply addressees: @Lurker157724598 @TheWitn25016851
-
Government is an evil beast. The law is a scalpel. Voting is a butter knife. And
Government is an evil beast. The law is a scalpel.
Voting is a butter knife.
And revolution is a chainsaw.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 08:28:00 UTC
-
It’s rule of law of reciprocity – the us constitution you nitwit. It’s just fixi
It’s rule of law of reciprocity – the us constitution you nitwit. It’s just fixing the six errors and two later mistakes in it.
Can I please get a twitter feed that cuts out the overconfident, underachieving, the room temperature IQ crowd? lol
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 02:36:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271632584485883904
Reply addressees: @mike51020 @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271630829995917316
-
It’s rule of law of reciprocity – the us constitution you nitwit. It’s just fixi
It’s rule of law of reciprocity – the us constitution you nitwit. It’s just fixing the six errors and two later mistakes in it.
Can I please get a twitter feed that cuts out the overconfident, underachieving, the room temperature IQ crowd? lol
Reply addressees: @mike51020 @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness -
RT @curtdoolittle: @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness I am a theorist (or what u
RT @curtdoolittle: @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness I am a theorist (or what used to be called a philosopher) of scientific jurisprudence…
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 02:15:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271627264304824321