But LAW MATTERS MORE THAN GOVERNMENT.
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
But LAW MATTERS MORE THAN GOVERNMENT
But LAW MATTERS MORE THAN GOVERNMENT.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-16 22:58:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273027280558833664
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273027279183056896
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Sorry but a written constitution of the natural law, a constitutional monarch as judge of last resort in the British model, supreme court, prime minister, a senate of the governors of the states, virtual houses of parliament for the classes and sexes is the optimum government. https://t.co/2vNzMC4Ryq
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1273027279183056896
-
Sorry but a written constitution of the natural law, a constitutional monarch as
Sorry but a written constitution of the natural law, a constitutional monarch as judge of last resort in the British model, supreme court, prime minister, a senate of the governors of the states, virtual houses of parliament for the classes and sexes is the optimum government. https://t.co/2vNzMC4Ryq
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-16 22:58:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273027279183056896
-
Sorry but a written constitution of the natural law, a constitutional monarch as
Sorry but a written constitution of the natural law, a constitutional monarch as judge of last resort in the British model, supreme court, prime minister, a senate of the governors of the states, virtual houses of parliament for the classes and sexes is the optimum government. https://t.co/2vNzMC4Ryq
-
That’s the logic and evidence. Anyone can argue with me if they want – and fail.
That’s the logic and evidence. Anyone can argue with me if they want – and fail. Whether Americans would tolerate it, or tolerate the Australian model, is a matter of their ignorance, not whether it is good or best. It is what it is. I expect USA to use a prime minister.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-16 22:51:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273025508402487297
Reply addressees: @WorldResist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273024818242359298
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@WorldResist I said a Constitutional Monarch, as in the British Monarchy, is the optimum judge of last resort, only defense against political tragedy of the commons, and the only defense against usurpation of kinship sovereignty, and that it was a mistake not to force Washington into it.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1273024818242359298
-
That’s the logic and evidence. Anyone can argue with me if they want – and fail.
That’s the logic and evidence. Anyone can argue with me if they want – and fail. Whether Americans would tolerate it, or tolerate the Australian model, is a matter of their ignorance, not whether it is good or best. It is what it is. I expect USA to use a prime minister.
Reply addressees: @WorldResist -
I said a Constitutional Monarch, as in the British Monarchy, is the optimum judg
I said a Constitutional Monarch, as in the British Monarchy, is the optimum judge of last resort, only defense against political tragedy of the commons, and the only defense against usurpation of kinship sovereignty, and that it was a mistake not to force Washington into it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-16 22:49:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273024818242359298
Reply addressees: @WorldResist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273022937617043462
-
I said a Constitutional Monarch, as in the British Monarchy, is the optimum judg
I said a Constitutional Monarch, as in the British Monarchy, is the optimum judge of last resort, only defense against political tragedy of the commons, and the only defense against usurpation of kinship sovereignty, and that it was a mistake not to force Washington into it.
Reply addressees: @WorldResist -
I just don’t want to be associated with anything other than our new constitution
I just don’t want to be associated with anything other than our new constitution’s proposition that the key blue cities convert to city states under traditional free city law, giving blue 50% of the population and red 50%. Because no other solution is a tolerable settlement.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-16 22:32:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273020654703517696
Reply addressees: @JadeBai85455803 @judicialist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273019878237069312
-
I just don’t want to be associated with anything other than our new constitution
I just don’t want to be associated with anything other than our new constitution’s proposition that the key blue cities convert to city states under traditional free city law, giving blue 50% of the population and red 50%. Because no other solution is a tolerable settlement.
Reply addressees: @JadeBai85455803 @judicialist