“WHAT DOES GSRRM STAND FOR?”

The Female (herd) competitive strategy of circumventing argument by use of undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by use of (D)enial, (D)isapproval,(O)utrage, (G) ossiping, (R]allying,(S)haming, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, (P)sychologizing,(U)ndermining, to cause (R)eputation destruction, Ostracization, or Death and solving for (F)ace, consensus, or consent .

This feminine strategy is in contrast with Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” using rejection or approval vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood.

FULL LIST

(D)enial

… (D)isapproval

… … (O)utrage

… … … (S)haming,

… … … … (M)oralizing,

… … … … … (P)sychologizing,

… … … … … … (R)idiculing

… … … … … … … [R]allying

… … … … … … … … (G)ossiping

… … … … … … … … … (P)ropagandizing

For the purpose of:

… … … … … … … … … … (U)ndermining,

… … … … … … … … … … … (R)eputation destruction.

And and preserving:

… (F)ace, approval, or consent – instead of Truth (Decidability)

… … (S)elf Image

… … … (S)tatus

… … … … (F)ree Riding

… … … … … (R)ent Seeking

… … … … … … (C)oruption

… … … … … … … (P)arasitism

… … … … … … … … (P)redation

With their act of:

… … … … … … … … … … (F)raud.

Men generally make an argument and let the argument do it work. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of disapproving of, denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it.

DIAGNOSIS

So discovering the lie is rather easy. It’s crime they commit, the fraud that the liars engage in, which provides them with the incentive to lie. This isn’t very difficult since the benefits of abrahamic deceit are all psychological comforts.

ADDICTION

Unfortunately, like all false comforts, whether psychotic(mental), ritual (religion), or chemical (drugs alcohol), the addiction is almost always incurable, and results in a life long struggle to recover.

—Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute.