PACK VS HERD
by Bill Joslin
INWARD: Life in a herd – “You’re a member to become a target to reduce the relative risk of all members – your survival depends upon your ability to compete for… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=498865280710367&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 14:34:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191000704565088257
—“Monogamy ensures that men and women of corresponding quality map onto (pair off with) each other. As long as you we don’t reproduce at the bottom, we remove the bottom, and the gene pool… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=498820524048176&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 13:20:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190981975584264195
INCENTIVES AT THE BOTTOM
(Michael Churchill )
There is no incentive for the people on the sub-optimal side of the curve to voluntarily go along with the extinction of their own DNA line.
There is declining incentive for the people at the top to enforce laws to prevent reproduction of those who are on the sub-optimal side of the curve.
And there are strong IN-centives for both capital and fifth-columnists to encourage reproduction on the sub-optimal side of the curve.
Overall human DNA is weakening in western societies, and the effect is cumulative over generations.
(Curt Doolittle)
The Incentive for people on the sub-optimal side of the curve is compensation NOT to reproduce, as well as prosecution IF they reproduce.
(Martin Štěpán)
I do see that. We’ve let it go too far. But if we isolate from the left though, I’m pretty sure there won’t be that many on the sub-optimal side of the spectrum. And ones that are, what can you really do with them besides paying them to obey the law and not reproduce, at least not more than one kid? If that’s not okay and they still commit crime, they need to be disposed of. And if we keep doing that, we’ll slowly keep improving.
I advocated for the same thing in healthcare as welfare, actually. You either pay your own or you use the tax-subsidized healthcare but in the latter case, you submit to one-child policy too, at least unless you manage to pay the money back.
(Curt Doolittle)
Yes. That’s the correct Incentive and policy.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 09:39:00 UTC
PACK VS HERD
by Bill Joslin
INWARD: Life in a herd – “You’re a member to become a target to reduce the relative risk of all members – your survival depends upon your ability to compete for resources with ingroup members without generating retaliation. The herd is gregarious but if you deviate, or if you require defense, you(and your offspring) will be abandoned.” – the mob – conform.
OUTWARD: Life in a Pack – “You’re a member because you fulfill a role within a division of labor. Your survival depends upon your success at this role and how it contributes to the group’s ability to compete with outgroups and external pressures (benefit scales with success). If you deviate, we’ll not abandon you, but suppress your potential for causing damage by reassigning your role (even if as nothing more than an outlet for our tensions)” – the family – be good for something, even if it’s just to be laughed at.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 09:34:00 UTC
—“Monogamy ensures that men and women of corresponding quality map onto (pair off with) each other. As long as you we don’t reproduce at the bottom, we remove the bottom, and the gene pool continues improving. It’s an alternative to the caste system that allows for mobility and gives *most men reason to contribute to society*. I also believe this is part of the reason we have such a wide bell curve and have been the only civilization to consistently produce genius outliers, they’re products of best men and best women.”— Martin Štěpán
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 08:19:00 UTC
RT @StefanMolyneux: Historically:
Women divide resources among their own children, so equal sharing is key to keeping peace.
Men compete…
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 22:36:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190759725882920960
CONSERVATIVE means *evidentiary* with warranty in pursuit of capitalization, in exchange for eugenics: The Masculine.
PROGRESSIVE means *promissory* without warranty, in pursuit of consumption and dysgenics: The Feminine.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 14:10:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190632191132422145
CONSERVATIVE means *evidentiary* with warranty in pursuit of capitalization, in exchange for eugenics: The Masculine.
PROGRESSIVE means *promissory* without warranty, in pursuit of consumption and dysgenics: The Feminine.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 10:10:00 UTC
The Origin of Political Conflict in Women’s Genetic Strategy.
If you want answers to the conflcit of our age, and you aren’t following me (and the rest of us) you are missing out on the greatest innovation in social sciences since Darwin. https://t.co/LkfC0nP54z
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 23:01:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190403626914787328
The Origins of Political Conflict in Women’s Genetic Strategy https://propertarianism.com/2019/11/01/the-origins-of-political-conflict-in-womens-genetic-strategy/
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 22:48:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190400344666361856