Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Education – Production of Agency

    The Production of Agency

    —“To be of a sound mind for logical reasoning requires control of emotions. This control of the emotions begins with control over the body. Control of the body is obtained by fitness: stresses, trial, and error. The sequence by which we develop our agency is physical>emotional>mental.”— John Mattison

    AGENCY, VIA POSITIVA AND VIA NEGATIVA Again, whether we are talking the existing definition in social science, or my extended definition in natural law, Agency refers to the absence of impediment, the same way that truth refers to the absence of falsehood. We do not know what the unknown impediments and falsehoods consists of we only know that they are removable. As such: One can grant authority (permission in your stead). One can delegate (assign tasks and responsibilities). One can educate (remove ignorance) One can physically emotionally and mentally train (give discipline) One can discover (produce new knowledge with which to educate) One can remove impediments (govern or rule) So again, via positiva the sculptor constructs (justifies) with clay, or via negativa removes (criticizes) the stone. The scientist via positiva creates an opportunity for knowledge( hypothesis), and via negativa performs criticism (theory), then submits it to the market for further testing (survival) Just as via positive the abrahamist (sophist) via positiva constructs an excuse (Lies) with Pilpul to cause a moral hazard, or via negativa evades (Lies ) with Critique to destroy a moral good. The truth is created by a market competition between via positiva and via negativa. A sophism is created by the avoidance of market competition in both the real (physical) and ideal (imaginary) worlds. WHAT KIND OF IMPEDIMENTS? Well, we don’t know what future limitations we might encounter, but we are impeded (limited) in mental capacity, mindfulness, knowledge, physical ability, resources, time, social, political, our physical world, and the laws of nature. So imagination, thought, independence from emotions, impulses and biases, knowledge, models of knowledge, the rate of knowledge accumulated, physical size, strength, speed, perception, health, cellular degeneration, biological composition, energy, physical resources, time, limits of imposed upon us by others, and the limits of controlling of others, and the limited abilities of others, and the limitations of the environment and the physical universe.

    Sun Tzu’s Art of War, Machiavelli’s Prince are Works of Agency

    There is only one book in world literature that is an equal to the western canon, and that is the art of war – although the european works of Machiavelli, are more advanced, the universal applicability of the first of all does it best. It is an essay in the amoral (not immoral). We spend so much time in moral mind, we leave ourselves open to defeat. So, he retrains us to think objectively rather than morally. It is not a book about war. It is a book by which we restore agency, lost in the training of our norms. Machiavelli provides the same advice more directly in The Prince and his Art of War: morality has no place in war or its preparation. The norms ‘untrain us’ to succeed in war. Hence all men must be trained in both war of the amoral, and commerce and cooperation of the moral. P IS A CORE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM I make a lot of mistakes. We all do. I don’t make many errors. (in business I’ve made two). In my thought-work, I don’t know of any … yet. And you needn’t either. P is very powerful. At least, it is very powerful if you are intellectually honest. Conversely, if we teach P like math, reading, grammar, and writing, we will end up with intellectually honest people because it will be so damned difficult to get away with intellectual dishonesty. P is the only known inoculation against Abrahamism, and the universal human pursuit of parasitism by ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit. Manners of non-imposition Ethics of non-imposition Morals of non-imposition Morality by Exchange. Positive Morality by Forbearance Extraordinary Morality by Investment Ultimate Morality by Sacrifice CURRICULUM Fitness(Self), Sport(Competition), Policing(Commons), Warfighting(Victory) Reading, Fairy Tales, Myths, Heroic Literature (criminal literature) Writing, Grammars(logics), Rhetoric (speech), Argument (persuasion), Debate, Acting (presenting), Manners, Ethics, Morals, The Natural Law, Customer Service, Negotiation, Contract, Common Law, Politics, War. Geographic History, Human History, Civilizational History, Art history, Biographical history, Economic history, military and political history, (and Criminal History) Arithmetic, Mathematics, Algebra, Geometry, Trigonometry, Pre Calc, Calculus, Linear Algebra, Statistics. Money, Accounting, Banking, Credit, Finance, Micro Economics, Entrepreneurial Economics, National Economics Human Scale Physics, Macro Physics, Micro Physics, Chemistry, Biochemistry, Genetics, Biology, Brain, Ecology Construction, Engineering, Programming, Chemical Engineering, Medicine, Genetics, Cognitive Science, Operations, Algorithms, functional programming, object-oriented programming, services programming,   Every Boy a Prince, and Every Girl a Princess.

  • Female mental illness is more rampant than male crime

    Female mental illness is more rampant than male crime.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-16 03:32:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195545059090935809

    Reply addressees: @NepstadThe

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195533577682923521


    IN REPLY TO:

    @NepstadThe

    @curtdoolittle Anybody ran across this gem before that ran for congress?? https://t.co/m1twE3U3aZ

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195533577682923521

  • Metaphysics = Cog Sci. “Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy that examines th

    Metaphysics = Cog Sci.
    “Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy that examines the fundamental nature of reality, including the relationship between mind and matter, between substance and attribute, and between potentiality and actuality.”
    ie: cog sci.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-15 14:32:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195348912263049216

    Reply addressees: @rohansharan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195348573740769282


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @rohansharan And no, it doesn’t mean ‘beyond the physics’, that’s just a later classification of that scope of work, because it came after the physics in the order of aristotle’s work. Not because it was ‘beyond the physics.’..

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1195348573740769282


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @rohansharan And no, it doesn’t mean ‘beyond the physics’, that’s just a later classification of that scope of work, because it came after the physics in the order of aristotle’s work. Not because it was ‘beyond the physics.’..

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1195348573740769282

  • HUMAN FACULTIES 1. sense (neurons-nerves) 2. disambiguation (constant relations

    HUMAN FACULTIES

    1. sense (neurons-nerves)

    2. disambiguation (constant relations – cortex),

    3. perception(integration-prediction – cortex),

    4. intuition (auto-association-prediction) (hippocampus-cortex + valuation(emotion))

    5. attention (attention-prediction) (thalamus-hippoampus-cortex),

    6. will (recursion-prediction) (prefrontal, thalamus, hippocampus, cortex)

    7. and release of actions;


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-13 09:28:00 UTC

  • You can’t run. You can’t hide. You can only pretend your not surrendering. And y

    You can’t run.
    You can’t hide.
    You can only pretend your not surrendering.
    And you can only pretend you’re not surrendering to hide your cowardice.
    But you only hide it from yourself – not… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=504786026784959&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-12 04:04:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1194103579340095488

  • You can’t run. You can’t hide. You can only pretend your not surrendering. And y

    You can’t run.

    You can’t hide.

    You can only pretend your not surrendering.

    And you can only pretend you’re not surrendering to hide your cowardice.

    But you only hide it from yourself – not us, not the future.

    It is terribly easy to win.

    The cost to the population is high.

    The rewards are far higher however.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-11 23:04:00 UTC

  • SO YEAH, IT’S ACTUALLY TRUE THAT EUROPEANS ARE GENETICALLY SUPERIOR. SO NOW WHAT

    SO YEAH, IT’S ACTUALLY TRUE THAT EUROPEANS ARE GENETICALLY SUPERIOR. SO NOW WHAT?

    —“Recent research not only confirms the existence of substantial psychological variation around the globe but also highlights the peculiarity of many Western populations. We propose that part of this variation can be traced back to the action and diffusion of the Western Church, the branch of Christianity that evolved into the Roman Catholic Church. Specifically, we propose that the Western Church’s transformation of European kinship, by promoting small, nuclear households, weak family ties, and residential mobility, fostered greater individualism, less conformity, and more impersonal prosociality. By combining data on 24 psychological outcomes with historical measures of both Church exposure and kinship, we find support for these ideas in a comprehensive array of analyses across countries, among European regions, and among individuals from different cultural backgrounds.”—

    Correct, which is what Emmanuel Todd has said for three decades and what HBD-Chick specializes in.

    Now, the reason the church did this was purely evil: so that it could break up the large land holding families and gradually acquire the land, so that by the end of the high middle ages, half the land in europe, and half the capital was dead, and the surpluses were bing used to build cathedrals etc (20% of gdp in particular).

    So the way to look it is, that he church failed as a political force, and t failed to build ‘corporate europe’ but in doing so in parallel with aristocratic Manorialism, they created a genetic meat grinder for familism, creating our high tolerance and high pro-sociality.

    Now, the argument is that this is (a) an existing northern european disposition, (b) exacerbated by the church and (c) brought to fruition by manorialism, which (d) eventually reacted against church corruption, producing protestantism, and the conversion of christianity into a folk religion (non-institutional) and therefore ending the Byzantine conquest of roman empire, and subsequent conquest of europe.

    So, now that we know we’re genetically unique and SUPERIOR, then how to we preserve those millennia of capital inheritance.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-10 16:47:00 UTC

  • Pink Shirts and white sorts High Investment Grooming (powerhouse) Eccentric High

    Pink Shirts and white sorts

    High Investment Grooming (powerhouse)

    Eccentric High Investment (WASP)

    F-U Open Collar/ Jacket

    Black Turtleneck

    Coat and Tie

    White Collar

    Hipsters

    Polo Shirt Uniform.

    Sportsman

    Blue Collar (Workman)

    No Collar

    Sports Wear

    Wife Beater


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-10 15:52:00 UTC

  • WOMEN IN OUR ARGUMENTS Oh. BTW: Women rarely engage in any of these arguments at

    WOMEN IN OUR ARGUMENTS

    Oh. BTW: Women rarely engage in any of these arguments at the fundamental level – more to ‘fine tune’ our arguments – especially when we overdo it. (which we do)…. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=503296116933950&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-10 00:35:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193326346702934017

  • WOMEN IN OUR ARGUMENTS Oh. BTW: Women rarely engage in any of these arguments at

    WOMEN IN OUR ARGUMENTS

    Oh. BTW: Women rarely engage in any of these arguments at the fundamental level – more to ‘fine tune’ our arguments – especially when we overdo it. (which we do).

    It’s MEN who use the female strategy of undermining(GSRRM) that are the usual target of our criticism – not women. So yeah, when we say “You’re using the female means of showing disapproval instead of argument to the truth or falsehood, reciprocity or irreciprocity of the argument – when and claiming you’re falsifying the argument.” So yes, it’s not just calling the opposition dishonest, but insulting his masculinity.

    What you’ll find here is that the primary difference between men and women is female cog bias of NAXALT (exceptions) because of the personal cog bias, and the male cog bias of Generalizations (distributions), because of the political cog bias. )

    Hugs.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 19:35:00 UTC