Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Question: @JonHaidt, Followers, #MoralFoundations #personality #research I’m loo

    Question: @JonHaidt, Followers, #MoralFoundations #personality #research
    I’m looking for any research on Envy (material, not jealousy-status,mates) and correlation with Moral Foundations or Six/Five Factors; or any data available for analysis.Test for Neuroticism or Gender. -Thx.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-07 14:42:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192452284917207040

  • HUMAN BEINGS IN A FEW PARAGRAPHS The human brain grows in utero, biased in organ

    HUMAN BEINGS IN A FEW PARAGRAPHS

    The human brain grows in utero, biased in organization, either for the female Synthetic(conflationary) by hemispheric integration (side to side), short term (temporal), experiential(emotional), personal (empathic), preferable(experience) and dysgenic(quantity); or the male Analytic(disambiguating), by hemispheric isolation (back-to front) long term (intertemporal), analytical(intellectual), political (empirical), truth(action), and eugenic(quality) – with each of us resulting by genetic bias, to demonstrate some point on that distribution, between the Female Solipsistic-to-Psychotic and the Male Aspie-to-Autistic Extreme.

    And because the brain is organized as it must be, to give attention to that which provides the most information, and because that which receives attention (novelty identification, rehearsal to integrate for recall, and reinforcement through recall), provides the associative-foundation for subsequent learning (framing), and as a consequence, the associative bias for subsequent learning.

    As such we think, display, speak and act, within our genetic biases, including the preference for the most easily understood frame (Feminine empathic to Masculine analytic),the most easily understood means of expression (speech), the most easily understood means of advocacy(approval/disapproval-empathic/personal vs truth/falsehood-analytic/political), including our means of argument (approval/disapproval independent of truth/falsehood, vs truth/falsehood independent of approval/disapproval).

    And while we currently (poorly) articulate intelligence plus five factors of personal (personality) bias: openness/novelty-consistency/familiarity, Extraversion-Introversion, Agreeableness-Disagreeablness, Conscientiousness(Organized)-Impulsivity(Disorganized), Neuroticism/Worry-Calm/Mindfulness, we all cluster around three common (stereotypical, archetypal) combinations: mother, ascendent male, and established male.Evidence in argumentative methods, educational degrees, occupational intersets, and voting patterns.

    And while we currently (rather well) articulate six factors of interpersonal(moral) biases, Care/Harm, Fairness/Cheating, Loyalty/Betrayal, Authority/Subversion, Sanctity/Degradation, and Liberty/Oppression, we all cluster around three common (stereotypical, archetypal) combinations: liberal(mother), libertarian(ascendent male), and conservative(established male). Evidence in consumer and voting patterns.

    And our conflict strategies vary accordingly between feminine undermining and reputation destruction (‘ostracize/kill’), and male argument and hierarchy construction(‘discipline, correct’).

    And our anti-social behavior varies accordingly between feminine social hostility by promiscuity, emotional terrorizing, social undermining, and male physical hostility by substance abuse, violence, crime.

    While each of us appears impenetrable as an individual given the abilities and biases we possess, the memories we possess, and the context we live in, in the aggregate, all populations adhere to these evolutionary tendencies, with the principle variation between groups very few factors: (a) the degree of neoteny achieved, (b) the verbal acuity achieved, (c) the demographic distribution of ability (class) and therefore (d) the strategy institutions,, traditions, norms, that are necessary for that degree of neoteny, verbal acuity, demographic distribution.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-07 07:06:00 UTC

  • Established Male Empirical: Aristocracy, Hierarchy, Authority, Force(Command), S

    Established Male Empirical: Aristocracy, Hierarchy, Authority, Force(Command), Saving – Long Term
    Ascendent Male Practical: Oligarchy, Meritocracy, Rule of Law, Production – Med Term
    Female Empathy Impulsive: Priesthood, Equality, Undermining(religion), Consumption – Short Term


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 19:55:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191806344959008768

    Reply addressees: @MeisterDutch @JohnMarkSays @StefanMolyneux @RAZ0RFIST @NickJFuentes @Nature_and_Race

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191804704910696449


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MeisterDutch @JohnMarkSays @StefanMolyneux @RAZ0RFIST @NickJFuentes @Nature_and_Race As in all things, all psychology, ethics, sociology and politics can easily be described in economic terms:
    Masculine: Conservative: Accumulate Quality – Eugenics.
    Neutral: Productive: Facilitate Accumulations – Compromise
    Feminine: Consumptive: Accumulate Quantity – Dysgenics.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191804704910696449


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MeisterDutch @JohnMarkSays @StefanMolyneux @RAZ0RFIST @NickJFuentes @Nature_and_Race As in all things, all psychology, ethics, sociology and politics can easily be described in economic terms:
    Masculine: Conservative: Accumulate Quality – Eugenics.
    Neutral: Productive: Facilitate Accumulations – Compromise
    Feminine: Consumptive: Accumulate Quantity – Dysgenics.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191804704910696449

  • As in all things, all psychology, ethics, sociology and politics can easily be d

    As in all things, all psychology, ethics, sociology and politics can easily be described in economic terms:
    Masculine: Conservative: Accumulate Quality – Eugenics.
    Neutral: Productive: Facilitate Accumulations – Compromise
    Feminine: Consumptive: Accumulate Quantity – Dysgenics.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 19:49:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191804704910696449

    Reply addressees: @MeisterDutch @JohnMarkSays @StefanMolyneux @RAZ0RFIST @NickJFuentes @Nature_and_Race

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191799297190383618


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191799297190383618

  • We must balance the permissiveness with discipline, so that the boys engage in p

    We must balance the permissiveness with discipline, so that the boys engage in pranks but not crimes; so that as men they will be competitors in the market and fathers at home; and be soldiers in war, and citizens in the commons.

    Aristocracy: Cheer them on, but carry a stick. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 17:20:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191767341337632768

    Reply addressees: @freedomismoral

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191766058157215744


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191766058157215744

  • ROMAN WEEKS VS USA CURRENT, AND FUTURE WEEKS AND WHY? AFAIK: OPTIMUM CALENDAR: 1

    ROMAN WEEKS VS USA CURRENT, AND FUTURE WEEKS AND WHY?

    AFAIK: OPTIMUM CALENDAR:

    13 * 4wk, 7day Months is pretty optimum in modernity.

    5 * 6hr work days wit 1hr break, are maximum human productivity at current work rates (hard). Tohse of us who are elites will always work more – because we love to.

    4 * 6hr work days, and three days off reconstructs the family unit. Even if both parents work. This should be possible with automation and exit of the underclasses.

    End summer vacations for schools and universities, and increase vacations throughout the year for all.

    WHY IS THIS MISLEADING?

    because (a) indoctrination into the culture (which matters), (b) the necessity of ‘being open for business’ the maximum amount of hours, therefore seizing the maximum number of opportunities, is a competitive necessity unless not only the whole country does it (see Cyprus – which is an outlier) or the whole world does it (seven day weeks). Because ‘availability’ is in fact a competitive advantage.

    So the problem remains one of competing with others externally for opportunity via availability, competing with others internally for access to opportunity, experience and information, so that ‘not being there’ is a disadvantage over those who ‘are there’ – and there is nothing that can stop it whatsoever – except legislatively and therefore universally leveling the playing field. So if you want it, that’s the answer.

    So anyone’s job that is driven by opportunity (sales, executive), and private professionals who want to work will work whatever they want for as much as they want, and people who not opportunity but production oriented, such as managerial, administrative, clerical, craftsman, labor, and service will work regularly because frankly YOU ARE SUBSTITUTABLE. That’s why you will always make less income that NON-SUBSTITUTABLE pepole. And it’s why non-substitutable people make more money: because ten percent of the people do

    ROMAN CALENDAR

    The Romans did not recognize the week as a unit of time, so didn’t have weekends.

    The Romans had months, which they divided up by specially named days: Kalends(1st), Nones(~5th/7th), and Ides(~13th/15th). The time of these was probably originally based on phases of the moon.

    The Kalends was always the first day of the month.

    The Nones were eight days before the Ides, on either the 5th or 7th of the month.

    The Ides were thought to have originally coincided with the full moon, and fell on the 15th of months with 31 days, and otherwise on the 13th.

    These were not treated as holidays; they were purely for identifying days in the month. Instead of saying, “It’s Monday,” the Romans would say, “It’s sixteen days before the Kalends of September.” They always counted backwards, and inclusively.

    As for workdays vs holidays, the Romans celebrated many fixed holidays (feriae), as well as ones that were simply declared. Most were religious, at least in name, and were occasions when at least some people did not work.

    In some cases, games were held, often funded by the wealthy, perhaps with the goal of getting votes.

    There were nearly 180 of these held during a typical year, and though every worker did not take every one of these days off, there were many opportunities to have a day off here and there.

    Roman work days: 365days – 180days = 185days = ~15 Days a Month work, ~15 days off. (this isn’t likely). It’s more likely 20-22, with every day for hand to mouth people, who didn’t run a farm.

    Americans work ~21 days a month including holidays.

    One thing to remember: there were no laws limiting how many hours or days an employee could work, what they must be paid, or how many days off they must have. People who were not slaves lived hand to mouth, and probably could not take a lot of days off for economic reasons.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 13:42:00 UTC

  • I am neither infant, toddler, or female. I do not worry about how I feel. Feelin

    I am neither infant, toddler, or female. I do not worry about how I feel. Feelings are for animals. Reason is for men. So I concern myself with achieving every excellence I can in life, leaving a mark on history for doing so, and ending it with a good death – at any cost.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 00:07:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191507386370084866

    Reply addressees: @Fneal1231

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191506129823633411


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191506129823633411

  • now that we can tell your race and ethnicity from brain scan activity, the end i

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331565083_Evidence_For_Bias_Of_Genetic_Ancestry_In_Resting_State_Functional_MRIWell, now that we can tell your race and ethnicity from brain scan activity, the end is night for indifferences. Not only are physical differences in the brain obvious, not only are behavioral differences demonstrated by that brain obvious, but the internal operation of the brain is different.

    (Those researchers are brave to publish.)

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331565083_Evidence_For_Bias_Of_Genetic_Ancestry_In_Resting_State_Functional_MRIUpdated Nov 4, 2019, 11:49 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-04 09:55:00 UTC

  • Tim Beckley-Spillane A few related thoughts I’ve been struggling to make cohere:

    Tim Beckley-Spillane A

    few related thoughts I’ve been struggling to make cohere:

    —“that vitality and not intellect or imagination is the most reliable measure of fitness,

    Fitness for what? Do you mean physical fitness?

    —“as the latter are ancillary to it and will inevitably exhaust themselves without it; “—

    Physical fitness is reliably testable, although it is more important to not be unfit than it is to more than adequately fit.

    Reproduction is the only reliable test of genetic fitness.

    Eugenic reproduction is the only reliable test of the agency.

    Caloric conversion is the only reliable test of group fitness.

    So I don’t understand.

    —“that attacks against vitality are therefore the greatest existential threat faced by the living, “—

    I don’t have any idea what that means. If you mean sugar, corn syrup, carbs, no mandatory exercise in school that creates a life long habit, and no mandatory military service in exchange for retirement funds to maintain it. sure.

    Otherwise, I don’t know what that means.

    —“And so would form the nucleus of an optimally serviceable conception of Evil among the Life-affirming and productive, and of Good among the Life-denying and destructive; that escapist fantasies of non-biological/supernatural life are irreconcilable contradictions born and harbored in the minds of the maladapted and weak and thus rightly fearful, but overcome heroically by Western man; “–

    I think you mean that to have great ambitions for great projects and to be aware of the condition of your people and to fight for it requires physical fitness?

    I would buy that. True as far as I know.

    —“that the high tragicomic works of Western Art represent the constituent elements of an adaptive, scalable native polytheistic religion, the central message of which is reducible to a single three-letter word- not GOD, but YES, in affirmation of the Good, the creative, the true, the beautiful, and the vital, but also of the Evil, the destructive, the false, the ugly, and the dying, with a sharp distinction nevertheless maintained between these two classes, the former recognized as the source of all Life, and the latter as the source and great revealer by way of contrast of Life’s value; “—

    Ok , agreed if we have no aesthetic reprsentation of our heroism and our excellence and no inpsiration to match or exceed it then we can die off … yes.

    —“that the focus and highest achievement of Western Art in the Modern Age was to celebrate the value and richness not of Life merely, but of the Living Moment at ever higher resolutions, just as it had celebrated and deified the individual living form in preceding ages;”—

    I don’t think that’s true, and I’m pretty well versed in the arts across history. I can’t even think of where that idea would come from if it wasn’t the past century.

    —“that the tendency of Western Art has been to judge the quality of Life higher than its quantity/duration,”–

    That’s definitely not true. It’s to celebrate prosperity, plenty, excellence, beauty, heroism and most of all power. Even the submissive heroism of the devoted was for power.

    —“the underlying assumption being that Life not valued is hardly worth living and is wasted regardless of duration; and that Western Art is strongly linked with the philosophy of hedonism and serves as a means of mediation and reconciliation between masculine and feminine biases.”—

    Ok I can’t really figure that out, i think that the undermining by the jews, marxists, postmodernists is to destroy heroism and power, and willingness to defend that aesthetic.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 21:29:00 UTC

  • INCENTIVES AT THE BOTTOM (Michael Churchill ) There is no incentive for the peop

    INCENTIVES AT THE BOTTOM

    (Michael Churchill )
    There is no incentive for the people on the sub-optimal side of the curve to voluntarily go along with the extinction of their own DNA line…. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=498867977376764&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 14:39:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191001950210469888