Category: Epistemology and Method

  • NO YOU DON”T HAVE WRITER’S BLOCK – HOW TO WRITE You can’t write from a feeling –

    NO YOU DON”T HAVE WRITER’S BLOCK – HOW TO WRITE

    You can’t write from a feeling – you can’t maintain it. You can’t write from inspiration – it will dissipate.

    OR….
    You can identify a… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=489648004965428&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 17:30:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186333893756162049

  • WRITING FICTION AND THE GRAMMARS I suppose I ought to point out that I treat fic

    WRITING FICTION AND THE GRAMMARS

    I suppose I ought to point out that I treat fiction as one of the “Grammars” in P, and I include the “archetypes, plots, and sentences” (the grammar(logic) of fiction) in the book. It might be helpful or disheartening to see all the forms of human communication reduced to algorithmic format, tied back to geometry, but it provides extraordinary clarity just like all the sciences help provide extraordinary clarity across phenomenon that otherwise appear incomprehensibly different.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 15:15:00 UTC

  • NO YOU DON”T HAVE WRITER’S BLOCK – HOW TO WRITE You can’t write from a feeling –

    NO YOU DON”T HAVE WRITER’S BLOCK – HOW TO WRITE

    You can’t write from a feeling – you can’t maintain it. You can’t write from inspiration – it will dissipate.

    OR….

    You can identify a question or a problem, or an argument (persuasion), and write a record of your exploration of it. You can identify a theory, and write your character’s investigation of it. You can identify a strategy given the history of “the technology of storytelling using archetypes, fundamental invariant human experiences, plot combinations, points of view (narrator, first, second), and past present and future contexts, to create a novelty, or an adaptation, revisiting the human experience to make an observation relevant to the day or era.” You can maintain your interests and attention mentally and emotionally.

    If you’re just writing from feeling or inspiration, thats why you’re failing yourself and your audience, because since you aren’t learning anything – neither are they. You have have something interesting in your head to write something interesting. The propensity to imagine is a talent, but writing is a craft like any other.

    Never confuse writing with therapy, nor work with avoidance, nor art with entertainment, nor sex with masturbation.

    Unless you’re being taught writing by the upper .01% you’re wasting your time. Writing is another form of engineering raised to an art. You can’t create an art without learning the science (engineering), the craft (practice) and the art (innovation).

    It’s not worth talented people’s time to help you find therapy, entertainment, or self gratification.

    My first ‘tough love’ review in art school was the question ‘why are you making art?’ I foolishly said “because it is fun” (meaning therapeutic). The response was “let me know when it’s work. bEcause then you’re learning, then you might have something to say. Until you’re working and working hard, you’re wasting our time, your time, and the audience’s time.”

    You can’t get a good education in the arts today. It’s just not possible. Even at Yale. Maybe CCAC. It’s almost impossible to get a good education today. You are a customer whose satisfaction is to be earned with the least conflict, not a student who the teachers and professors bear the burden to transforming into an innovator or aesthete.

    So you have to educate yourself, or find a group of mentors for whom your potential is worth their investment.

    Writers block doesn’t exist.

    A head empty of ideas because it’s not full of opportunities for free association exists.

    Creativity is not magic. It’s a discipline.

    Fill the shelves of your mind with related material.

    Go do something playful that doesn’t require you refill those shelves with something else.

    Take a shower. Go for a drive. Go for a walk. Go shopping. Anything that’s pleasingly stimulating for your senses but doesn’t occupy your brain.

    The answer will come to you when your bundles of neurons are done with their process of auto association.

    The brain accumulates novelties.

    So go research something somehow related to the characters or context or plot – and fill the shelves of your mind so it can use free association (auto-association) to identify and create novelties.

    If you’re sitting in a chair you’re just wasting your time.

    If you’re out and about and engaged in social activities, or any form of entertainment you’re wasting your time.

    Gather, observe people (what I do), Listen to people, play, exercise, relax, contemplate, and then try.

    If not, then repeat until it works.

    If you are exhausted by the topic start another one on a different topic. Doing so will cause you to auto-associate with your last topic or tory.

    There is nothing magic to this process.

    It’s just training yourself to insulate your five faculties from one another: senses, emotions, intuitions, reason, and actions, so that you use only use the one you need in the moment.

    For creativity you need your intuition: free association.

    Most memories are time and location dependent. Memories are saved by replaying three or more sequential episodes. When they are replaying (below your conscious threshold) they are auto-associating, and with every replay the breadth of auto association increases because neural connections increase. you are trying to let auto association not THINKING do the work for you until you find an idea. Then you think how to move your character or plot or argument from here to there.

    Creativity is just a discipline like meditation or stoicism or studying – a means of training your brain to delivery what your mind wants from it. Creative people just want novelty more than those less creative. They’re novelty junkies. But novelty requires new material to cause auto association. When I teach people anything from storytelling, to argument, to engineering, to web design to system architecture I say the same thing: go do some research on what others have done. you aren’t smarter or more creative than anyone else. You’re either identifying an opportunity to attract audience attention, and filling your mind with tools of auto-association, or you’re living under the illusion that you have some magic talent. You don’t ARt is just the generation of novelty in the craft you are experimenting upon by narrative, composition (aesthetics), materials, or technique. It doesn’t matter what art we talk about.

    A brain is a very big but very simple thing that does just one thing: It performs free (auto) associations until something is interesting enough to raise to your attention.

    You just have to train your mind to let your brain do its work.

    And then think (work) at getting from where you are to where you want to be given that interesting idea.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 13:30:00 UTC

  • “most philosophers are terrible writers”— Yep. Well, there are a number of goo

    —“most philosophers are terrible writers”—

    Yep.

    Well, there are a number of good reasons, the first of which is the attempt to construct a new paradigm using existing language – some of… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=489107218352840&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 00:35:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186078577164468224

  • “most philosophers are terrible writers”— Yep. Well, there are a number of goo

    —“most philosophers are terrible writers”—

    Yep.

    Well, there are a number of good reasons, the first of which is the attempt to construct a new paradigm using existing language – some of which, like aristotle’s is clarifying, some of which like Heidegger is obscurant, and some of which like derrida is intentionally for the purpose of furthering deception.

    So between paradigmatic problems, novelty problems, and truth, analogy, poetic (nietzsche), fictionalization (Shopenhauer), and deceit (derrida, freud, adorno), and the academic failure to create a science out of formal logic (it’s all tautology so it doesn’t matter), then there is a lot of room for bad writing. lol 😉

    I think writing well is very hard. I’ve been writing profusely most of my life and I don’t think I was really worth reading until I was in my thirties (although my subject matter was part of the problem). My subject matter is still a problem… lol

    But writing characters, scenes and dialog using the various points of view, in various order, with various plots, with various characters … I mean, I think it’s really hard to write fiction well. I can’t bear reading much of it. I’ve nearly lost my ability to read fiction. (which apparently is more common than I thought)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-20 20:35:00 UTC

  • WRITING (from elsewhere) Many people use writing for therapy, escape, or self en

    WRITING
    (from elsewhere)

    Many people use writing for therapy, escape, or self entertainment, not for others to actually read. I’m a philosopher. Philosophers have to generate a novel idea,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=488896631707232&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-20 18:02:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185979516885372930

  • No sense of moral righteousness and virtue signaling to be had from empirical me

    No sense of moral righteousness and virtue signaling to be had from empirical measures – need petty moralising for the Demi humans to empathise with. Reason and evidence are too difficult for the barely domesticated animals.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-20 14:08:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185920759719432193

    Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185908473420304384


    IN REPLY TO:

    @BobMurphyEcon

    In the comments, there is more discussion of trans issues (due to the headline) than public finance issues. Economists are always the low person on the totem pole. https://t.co/tlie2P5oRy

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185908473420304384

  • WRITING (from elsewhere) Many people use writing for therapy, escape, or self en

    WRITING

    (from elsewhere)

    Many people use writing for therapy, escape, or self entertainment, not for others to actually read. I’m a philosopher. Philosophers have to generate a novel idea, and write a book advocating and defending it. Thinking philosophically only means you’re human, doing an arts and crafts hobby not a philosopher. Likewise, writing a story or novel only means you’re human. Unless you write a novel narrative, advocate it and defend it with your characters and narrator, you’re just a human doing an arts and crafts hobby for personal entertainment.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-20 14:01:00 UTC

  • I call it Vitruvianism in honor of Davinci’s Vitruivan Man. —“Man is the Syste

    I call it Vitruvianism in honor of Davinci’s Vitruivan Man.

    —“Man is the System of Weights and Measures for all things Human”—

    But the first man to say it:

    —“Man is the measure of all things.”— Protagoras


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 18:43:00 UTC

  • Certain taboos, while true and obvious negatively effect transmissions of that w

    Certain taboos, while true and obvious negatively effect transmissions of that which is true, not obvious, and necessary to understand.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-18 21:22:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185305279535239168

    Reply addressees: @lllLucart

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185277661398089728


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185277661398089728