Curt Doolittle

Category: Epistemology and Method

  • My reading list is on the site under Main menu > propertarianism > reading list.

    My reading list is on the site under Main menu > propertarianism > reading list. But let me ask followers their opinion. Because they say once you get propertarian ethics, and the grammars, Abrahamism and GSRRM, that’s most of it. Testimonialism is harder -takes more practice.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 19:08:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187083295793831938

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187082470858149888

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable โ€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187082470858149888

  • And yes, most of it is the vocabulary and particularly the vocabulary in series

    And yes, most of it is the vocabulary and particularly the vocabulary in series format.Once you get it’s a system of measurement, and a logic like any other, it starts fitting together. Some of the guys are getting better than I am now in some parts of it. You will too. I see it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 19:02:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187081825736372226

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187081484726878208

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @fryskefilosoof Well, you’re asking for help in the best way possible. ๐Ÿ˜‰ I’ll help you however I can. Yes the learning curve is steep but the value of “OMG now I get THIS TOO!!’ experience never ends. Ask Bill. It really is like the scientific revolution for psychology, sociology, politics.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187081484726878208

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @fryskefilosoof Well, you’re asking for help in the best way possible. ๐Ÿ˜‰ I’ll help you however I can. Yes the learning curve is steep but the value of “OMG now I get THIS TOO!!’ experience never ends. Ask Bill. It really is like the scientific revolution for psychology, sociology, politics.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187081484726878208

  • THE POSTMODERN PROGRAM – TRUTH DOESN’T MATTER, IT’S ALL JUST REDUCIBLE TO POWER

    THE POSTMODERN PROGRAM – TRUTH DOESN’T MATTER, IT’S ALL JUST REDUCIBLE TO POWER

    —“Talked to a physical professor today, he said … It is *semantics* to say: that energy is not always… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=490564738207088&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 21:34:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186757661758574592

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/73076843_491146564815572_31934774621

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/73076843_491146564815572_3193477462122037248_n_491146561482239.jpg WHY THE SWAN LOGO? FALSIFICATIONISM.

    —“Why do you use a black swan as your symbol?”—Spooky Question @QuestionMThings

    —“P is a completion of scientific method which works by falsification. No matter how many white swans you see, it doesn’t justify a claim that black swans don’t exist (Hume).”—Martin ล tฤ›pรกn

    That is, of course, the correct answer. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    And …. Via Taleb, Counter-intuitive, radical, unpredictable events are more influential than the foreseeable. What you don’t know and don’t predict is what will harm you. Whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. Seek Stresses for fitness (survival). Note that we are distancing ourselves from Taleb now that he’s gone over the edge.

    And … it’s Elegant, Rare, and Beautiful. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    And … it’s a peaceful normie-friendly icon. ;)WHY THE SWAN LOGO? FALSIFICATIONISM.

    —“Why do you use a black swan as your symbol?”—Spooky Question @QuestionMThings

    —“P is a completion of scientific method which works by falsification. No matter how many white swans you see, it doesn’t justify a claim that black swans don’t exist (Hume).”—Martin ล tฤ›pรกn

    That is, of course, the correct answer. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    And …. Via Taleb, Counter-intuitive, radical, unpredictable events are more influential than the foreseeable. What you don’t know and don’t predict is what will harm you. Whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. Seek Stresses for fitness (survival). Note that we are distancing ourselves from Taleb now that he’s gone over the edge.

    And … it’s Elegant, Rare, and Beautiful. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    And … it’s a peaceful normie-friendly icon. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 21:21:00 UTC

  • THE POSTMODERN PROGRAM – TRUTH DOESN’T MATTER, IT’S ALL JUST REDUCIBLE TO POWER

    THE POSTMODERN PROGRAM – TRUTH DOESN’T MATTER, IT’S ALL JUST REDUCIBLE TO POWER

    —“Talked to a physical professor today, he said … It is *semantics* to say: that energy is not always heat, and that heat flow is irreversible, and that heat is produced as a difference in temperature and flows from hot to cold. …Yep…that happened. It usually happens over internet communication. First time to my face.”— Joseph E. Postma

    —“Proof that the sickness of postmodernism has also infected the hard sciences.”—Murray O’Brien

    —“You might as well go into a church and try to explain to the congregation that there is no god. But, the POINT is, those that matter, in the congregation, do not care if there is a god or not. They know the belief in a god is what they benefit from. So, they are the ones that have to destroy you, by any means. Otherwise they lose their control over, and resulting benefit from, the rest of the believing congregation. It is simply a matter of control, NOT science, or logic, or reason.”—Derek Alker

    –“Simply a matter of power.”— Joseph E. Postma

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 17:34:00 UTC

  • TEST Disambiguate, Serialize, and Operationalize the term “Wrong”

    TEST
    Disambiguate, Serialize, and Operationalize the term “Wrong”.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 14:11:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186646163040157698

  • TODAY’S P-QUIZ : “WRONG” . Disambiguate, Serialize, and Operationalize the term

    TODAY’S P-QUIZ : “WRONG”

    .

    Disambiguate, Serialize, and Operationalize the term “Wrong”.

    .

    1. Collect synonyms and antonyms.

    2. Serialize

    3. Operationalize

    4. State (list) the constant relation(s)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 10:10:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/73007253_491086928154869_23273420177

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/73007253_491086928154869_232734201776963584_o_491086924821536.jpg TODAY’S FIRST QUIZ: WHAT GOES WITH WHAT?

    You’re missing the point. In western aristocratic civilization we ask “How can I make the world a better place, and profit from it, by contributing to it?” Whereas some say the world is a better place for others, how can I get more of it for me? The immoral say only “How can I make make the most profit and survive it?” The foolish say “My world is great, so how can i give it away to others?” And (d) the Enemy Says “How can I make the world a worse place, and profit from it, by undermining it?”

    Now which GROUP or CLASS says what?

    Let’s expand and list the questions:

    a. How can I make it better, and profit from it?

    b. How can I get more of it?

    c. How can I maximize my take from it?

    d. How can I redistribute it to others?

    e. How can I profit from making it worse?

    Now answer who exercises each strategy?

    a) conservatives: aristocratic egalitarian europeans.

    b) ?

    c) ?

    d) ?

    e) ?TODAY’S FIRST QUIZ: WHAT GOES WITH WHAT?

    You’re missing the point. In western aristocratic civilization we ask “How can I make the world a better place, and profit from it, by contributing to it?” Whereas some say the world is a better place for others, how can I get more of it for me? The immoral say only “How can I make make the most profit and survive it?” The foolish say “My world is great, so how can i give it away to others?” And (d) the Enemy Says “How can I make the world a worse place, and profit from it, by undermining it?”

    Now which GROUP or CLASS says what?

    Let’s expand and list the questions:

    a. How can I make it better, and profit from it?

    b. How can I get more of it?

    c. How can I maximize my take from it?

    d. How can I redistribute it to others?

    e. How can I profit from making it worse?

    Now answer who exercises each strategy?

    a) conservatives: aristocratic egalitarian europeans.

    b) ?

    c) ?

    d) ?

    e) ?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 10:10:00 UTC

  • 9) You might think passing tests of truthful speech in court regardless of the c

    9) You might think passing tests of truthful speech in court regardless of the context is difficult but once you understand the P-method and particularly the grammars it isn’t hard at all. It’s a checklist. And every item in the checklist is testable before a jury.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 21:08:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186388932193374209

    Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186388679096459268

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 8) The net result is preserving free truthful and reciprocal speech while prohibiting false and irreciprocal speech, and restoring the via-negativa market of the law, to mirror the via positiva market for goods, services, information, whether private or common.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186388679096459268

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 8) The net result is preserving free truthful and reciprocal speech while prohibiting false and irreciprocal speech, and restoring the via-negativa market of the law, to mirror the via positiva market for goods, services, information, whether private or common.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186388679096459268

  • WRITING FICTION AND THE GRAMMARS I suppose I ought to point out that I treat fic

    WRITING FICTION AND THE GRAMMARS
    I suppose I ought to point out that I treat fiction as one of the “Grammars” in P, and I include the “archetypes, plots, and sentences” (the grammar(logic) of… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=489713778292184&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 19:15:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186360474679595010