Curt Doolittle

Category: Epistemology and Method

  • I like P because it creates, as intended, a universally commensurable, value-neu

    I like P because it creates, as intended, a universally commensurable, value-neutral vocabulary, grammar, and logic of language, psychology, and social science and provides complete falsification of all human speech. Jung and Hegel are literary(wisdom lit), not science(testable).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 11:43:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286628126332801025

    Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286573149455147008

  • Grammars: Theology, Ideology, Philosophy, Science, Law

    Grammars: Theology, Ideology, Philosophy, Science, Law https://t.co/6QFQX0uxBL

  • Grammars: Theology, Ideology, Philosophy, Science, Law

    Grammars: Theology, Ideology, Philosophy, Science, Law https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/23/grammars-theology-ideology-philosophy-science-law/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 20:33:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286399083201155078

  • Grammars: Theology, Ideology, Philosophy, Science, Law

    GRAMMARS: THEOLOGY, IDEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE, LAW

    THEOLOGY: a system (paradigm) of organizing populations for the purpose of obtaining their obedience. IDEOLOGY: a system (paradigm) of organizing populations for the purpose of influencing political policy. PHILOSOPHY: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for the purpose of satisfying particular preferences. SCIENCE: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for the purpose of producing universally coherent descriptions LAW: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for the purpose of universally resolving disputes GRAMMAR: Paradigm, Vocabulary, Logic of internal consistency with that vocabulary in that paradigm. For producing references (nouns), states (phrases), transactions (sentences), stories (ledgers) of changes in state (operations), by continuous recursive disambiguation. Langauge = measurement = accounting, and coherence = balancing the scale. All civilizations produce a group strategy, a mythos (archetypes, narratives), rituals (religion) to perpetuate it, a means (grammar) of arguing in favor of it

  • Grammars: Theology, Ideology, Philosophy, Science, Law

    GRAMMARS: THEOLOGY, IDEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE, LAW

    THEOLOGY: a system (paradigm) of organizing populations for the purpose of obtaining their obedience. IDEOLOGY: a system (paradigm) of organizing populations for the purpose of influencing political policy. PHILOSOPHY: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for the purpose of satisfying particular preferences. SCIENCE: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for the purpose of producing universally coherent descriptions LAW: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for the purpose of universally resolving disputes GRAMMAR: Paradigm, Vocabulary, Logic of internal consistency with that vocabulary in that paradigm. For producing references (nouns), states (phrases), transactions (sentences), stories (ledgers) of changes in state (operations), by continuous recursive disambiguation. Langauge = measurement = accounting, and coherence = balancing the scale. All civilizations produce a group strategy, a mythos (archetypes, narratives), rituals (religion) to perpetuate it, a means (grammar) of arguing in favor of it

  • (It appears very hard for humans to switch from imitation by justificationism[ex

    (It appears very hard for humans to switch from imitation by justificationism[excuses, rationalizations, permission] using positive morality and philosophy, to falsification[survival from adversarial criticism], using negative law and science. B/c the ape inside wants to imitate.

    Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @victorkfranco @Ozpin_88 @TruthQuest11

  • (It appears very hard for humans to switch from imitation by justificationism[ex

    (It appears very hard for humans to switch from imitation by justificationism[excuses, rationalizations, permission] using positive morality and philosophy, to falsification[survival from adversarial criticism], using negative law and science. B/c the ape inside wants to imitate.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 13:12:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286288052730683392

    Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @victorkfranco @Ozpin_88 @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286286051649224704

  • GRAMMARS: THEOLOGY, IDEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE, LAW THEOLOGY: a system (parad

    GRAMMARS: THEOLOGY, IDEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE, LAW

    THEOLOGY: a system (paradigm) of organizing populations for the purpose of obtaining their obedience.

    IDEOLOGY: a system (paradigm) of organizing populations for the purpose of influencing political policy.

    PHILOSOPHY: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for the purpose of satisfying particular preferences.

    SCIENCE: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for the purpose of producing universally coherent descriptions

    LAW: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for the purpose of universally resolving disputes

    Grammar: Paradigm, Vocabulary, Logic of internal consistency with that vocabulary in that paradigm. For producing references (nouns), states (phrases), transactions (sentences), stories (ledgers) of changes in state (operations), by continuous recursive disambiguation. Langauge = measurement = accounting, and coherence = balancing the scale.

    All civilizations produce a group strategy, a mythos (archetypes, narratives), rituals (religion) to perpetuate it, a means (grammar) of arguing in favor of it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 12:18:00 UTC

  • Philosophy: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for preferences

    Philosophy: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for preferences.

    Science: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for descriptions

    Law: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for resolving disputes

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

  • Philosophy: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for preferences

    Philosophy: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for preferences.

    Science: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for descriptions

    Law: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for resolving disputes

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 00:02:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285726794381963264

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285724324884819968