Category: Epistemology and Method

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/116345964_337645997633560_6430409338

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/116345964_337645997633560_6430409338

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/116345964_337645997633560_6430409338022713108_n_337645994300227.jpg PRODUCING MEASUREMENTS BY TRIANGULATION

    Triangulation. It’s the same process as disambiguation by Serialization and operationalization. Use of adversarial competition to rank by one or more dimensions.

    Art is the best example of something we presume can’t be objectively measured.

    But we can judge almost anything by the accumulated excellence of human actions: caloric content (more dependencies is better).

    Take an art movement. Take the examples of that movement. analyze and rank by craftsmanship(construction, technique, materials), design(aesthetics, composition, light, color, texture, ), meaning (content, simple content to high content).

    Compare the ultimate achievements of that movement with those that were less so. Order them – this is triangulation. “Where does this fit between what other two?”

    You will notice that the progression is not linear but logarithmic, with many adequate pieces and few superior.

    You now have an ordinal if logarithmically scaling measure if not a cardinal and linear measure.

    Keep adding artworks until because of marginal indifference, you must categorize groups instead of stacking individual pieces.

    Now those categories produce a cardinal measure. Repeat for all art movements.

    Then stack those movements.

    You now have a metric for judging pieces (three dimensions), categories (one or three dimensions), and movements (one or three dimensions).

    Art is the hardest thing I know of, but the triangulation is how the brain works internally, so … well, there you go.PRODUCING MEASUREMENTS BY TRIANGULATION

    Triangulation. It’s the same process as disambiguation by Serialization and operationalization. Use of adversarial competition to rank by one or more dimensions.

    Art is the best example of something we presume can’t be objectively measured.

    But we can judge almost anything by the accumulated excellence of human actions: caloric content (more dependencies is better).

    Take an art movement. Take the examples of that movement. analyze and rank by craftsmanship(construction, technique, materials), design(aesthetics, composition, light, color, texture, ), meaning (content, simple content to high content).

    Compare the ultimate achievements of that movement with those that were less so. Order them – this is triangulation. “Where does this fit between what other two?”

    You will notice that the progression is not linear but logarithmic, with many adequate pieces and few superior.

    You now have an ordinal if logarithmically scaling measure if not a cardinal and linear measure.

    Keep adding artworks until because of marginal indifference, you must categorize groups instead of stacking individual pieces.

    Now those categories produce a cardinal measure. Repeat for all art movements.

    Then stack those movements.

    You now have a metric for judging pieces (three dimensions), categories (one or three dimensions), and movements (one or three dimensions).

    Art is the hardest thing I know of, but the triangulation is how the brain works internally, so … well, there you go.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-25 12:27:00 UTC

  • (worth repeating) My job is to reform thought by increasing precision using disa

    (worth repeating)

    My job is to reform thought by increasing precision using disambiguation, serialization, operational language. Not to excuse the existing imprecision of thought. That frequently requires re-definition of terms whenever possible, and neologisms as a last resort.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-25 11:04:00 UTC

  • See? The truth really is enough. It’s just more expensive. More time-consuming.

    See?

    The truth really is enough.

    It’s just more expensive.

    More time-consuming.

    But it’s enough.

    Anyway, this cake is great.

    It’s so delicious and moist.

    Look at me still talking

    When there’s science to do.

    When I look at the world

    It makes me glad I’m not you.

    I’ve experiments to run

    There is research to be done

    On the people who are still alive

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 21:13:00 UTC

  • Correct. KOTH Games. Look at the range of responses it provoked. Once someone ha

    Correct. KOTH Games. Look at the range of responses it provoked. Once someone has the right answer, post it. Force the audience to teach each other. This is the Socratic method for men: dominance play. It is the cure to victorian posturing and philosophical sophistry in debate.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 17:03:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286708623104671745

    Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286702919417503748

  • Correct. KOTH Games. Look at the range of responses it provoked. Once someone ha

    Correct. KOTH Games. Look at the range of responses it provoked. Once someone has the right answer, post it. Force the audience to teach each other. This is the Socratic method for men: dominance play. It is the cure to victorian posturing and philosophical sophistry in debate.

    Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88 We li

    RT @curtdoolittle: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88 We like P because it consists of measurements independent of emo…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 11:56:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286631229442359308

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88 We li

    RT @curtdoolittle: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88 We like P because it consists of measurements independent of emo…

  • We like P because it consists of measurements independent of emotional contagion

    We like P because it consists of measurements independent of emotional contagion, unlike literature, that must operate by conflation of emotion & action.The German tradition is a logic of secular theology (emotion). The anglo tradition a language of law – meaning science (action)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 11:50:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286629727617286144

    Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286573149455147008

  • We like P because it consists of measurements independent of emotional contagion

    We like P because it consists of measurements independent of emotional contagion, unlike literature, that must operate by conflation of emotion & action.The German tradition is a logic of secular theology (emotion). The anglo tradition a language of law – meaning science (action)

    Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88

  • I like P because it creates, as intended, a universally commensurable, value-neu

    I like P because it creates, as intended, a universally commensurable, value-neutral vocabulary, grammar, and logic of language, psychology, and social science and provides complete falsification of all human speech. Jung and Hegel are literary(wisdom lit), not science(testable).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 11:43:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286628126332801025

    Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286573149455147008