Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

QUORA QUESTION: “How much of the resentment that blacks feel towards whites and that whites feel towards Jews is ultimately due to the lower average IQ of the lower performing group?” THE CORRECT ANSWER FIRST A group’s median or average IQ describes the center of the distribution. So all members of a group do not have higher or lower IQ’s. By and large there are just more people at the bottom of the IQ range due to reproductive practices, in some groups than another. Now the extremes are pygmies (very low), and Ashkenazim (a bit higher), and east Asians who for some reason do not pay an IQ penalty for rural existence (we have no idea why yet). Africans are physically superior in almost every way other than endurance, but trail in verbal ability (not in reasoning). Each group that reduces the size of its underclass expresses the best talents of its middle and upper classes. Jewish verbal ability, white and south american indian endurance; white engineering, innovation, creativity, and arts (and war); east African physical ability. East Asian rates of learning, and ability to work. SECOND Groups dislike competitors. Whites do not dislike East Asians. Protestants were and maybe still are, uncomfortable with Catholics. Catholics and Protestants uncomfortable with Jews. Everyone on earth is uncomfortable with Muslims. Why? Each group struggles to produce the manners, habits, ethics morals, values, traditions, laws, and institutions that optimize the group’s competitive strategy. The middle of the demographic distribution is determined by the size of the underclass. The middle of the distribution creates the greatest demand for norms, laws, and institutions. The traditions of east Asians and whites are very different but because of our distributions and group competitive strategies, we are compatible. The traditions, ethics morals, and laws of Jews and Muslims are not compatible with whites and east Asians. (or anyone else for that matter). So while Jews and Muslims are political activists seeking power to alter white civilization, east Asians and whites do not seek power to alter one another’s civilizations. The problem for blacks and Hispanics is that their distribution is lower and lower only because unlike whites, Jews, and east Asians, the blacks, Hispanics, and Muslims (the peoples of steppe and desert), have not reduced the size of their underclass through selective breeding, warfare, manorialism, and harsh winters. In other words, if you pursue political influence you will be hated. If you accumulate wealth you will be tolerated. If you integrate fully accumulate wealth but do not pursue political change by which to alter norms, traditions, laws, and institutions, then you will not be hated. CLOSING The principle problem then is quite simple:

1. WE ARE COMPETITORS IF WE ARE DIFFERENT ENOUGH TO WANT DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONS.
2. PROXIMITY BETWEEN COMPETITORS CREATES HATRED.
3. IT’S THAT SIMPLE: DIVERSITY IS REALLY, REALLY,REALLY BAD.

QUORA QUESTION: “How much of the resentment that blacks feel towards whites and that whites feel towards Jews is ultimately due to the lower average IQ of the lower performing group?” THE CORRECT ANSWER FIRST A group’s median or average IQ describes the center of the distribution. So all members of a group do not have higher or lower IQ’s. By and large there are just more people at the bottom of the IQ range due to reproductive practices, in some groups than another. Now the extremes are pygmies (very low), and Ashkenazim (a bit higher), and east Asians who for some reason do not pay an IQ penalty for rural existence (we have no idea why yet). Africans are physically superior in almost every way other than endurance, but trail in verbal ability (not in reasoning). Each group that reduces the size of its underclass expresses the best talents of its middle and upper classes. Jewish verbal ability, white and south american indian endurance; white engineering, innovation, creativity, and arts (and war); east African physical ability. East Asian rates of learning, and ability to work. SECOND Groups dislike competitors. Whites do not dislike East Asians. Protestants were and maybe still are, uncomfortable with Catholics. Catholics and Protestants uncomfortable with Jews. Everyone on earth is uncomfortable with Muslims. Why? Each group struggles to produce the manners, habits, ethics morals, values, traditions, laws, and institutions that optimize the group’s competitive strategy. The middle of the demographic distribution is determined by the size of the underclass. The middle of the distribution creates the greatest demand for norms, laws, and institutions. The traditions of east Asians and whites are very different but because of our distributions and group competitive strategies, we are compatible. The traditions, ethics morals, and laws of Jews and Muslims are not compatible with whites and east Asians. (or anyone else for that matter). So while Jews and Muslims are political activists seeking power to alter white civilization, east Asians and whites do not seek power to alter one another’s civilizations. The problem for blacks and Hispanics is that their distribution is lower and lower only because unlike whites, Jews, and east Asians, the blacks, Hispanics, and Muslims (the peoples of steppe and desert), have not reduced the size of their underclass through selective breeding, warfare, manorialism, and harsh winters. In other words, if you pursue political influence you will be hated. If you accumulate wealth you will be tolerated. If you integrate fully accumulate wealth but do not pursue political change by which to alter norms, traditions, laws, and institutions, then you will not be hated. CLOSING The principle problem then is quite simple:

1. WE ARE COMPETITORS IF WE ARE DIFFERENT ENOUGH TO WANT DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONS.
2. PROXIMITY BETWEEN COMPETITORS CREATES HATRED.
3. IT’S THAT SIMPLE: DIVERSITY IS REALLY, REALLY,REALLY BAD.