—“The sacred cow tastes best raw.”—Tom McSweeny
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-01 15:04:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046777834285543428
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
“Find the sacred, and you’ll likely find ignorance. For the sacred is that which
—“Find the sacred, and you’ll likely find ignorance. For the sacred is that which we hold above criticism, thus removing our best means of education.”—Skye Stewart
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-01 13:34:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046755108862775296
-
Sep 30, 2018, 11:29 PM
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/06/27/civil-war-likely-voters-say-rasmussen-poll/740731002/Updated Sep 30, 2018, 11:29 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-30 23:29:00 UTC
-
“You write all the time the same stuff, Mr. Doolittle. It’s boring.”— Tweeter
—“You write all the time the same stuff, Mr. Doolittle. It’s boring.”— Tweeter
It’s called “Staying On Message”. And it’s because new people come along all the time. And it’s through… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=299168380680059&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-30 19:57:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046489121097691136
-
“You write all the time the same stuff, Mr. Doolittle. It’s boring.”— Tweeter
—“You write all the time the same stuff, Mr. Doolittle. It’s boring.”— Tweeter
It’s called “Staying On Message”. And it’s because new people come along all the time. And it’s through repetition that they understand. My job isn’t entertainment – it’s education. I leave entertainment for lesser men. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-30 15:56:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/42862313_299118997351664_46188175753
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/42862313_299118997351664_4618817575399194624_n_299118994018331.jpg Yes on content, no on criticism. More later. Demand for monopoly of positiva is different from necessity of monopoly of negativa. Make up whatever fairy stories incels desire. There is only one truth, and it is falsehood, and everything else is simply preference that expresses one’s reproductive interests.Yes on content, no on criticism. More later. Demand for monopoly of positiva is different from necessity of monopoly of negativa. Make up whatever fairy stories incels desire. There is only one truth, and it is falsehood, and everything else is simply preference that expresses one’s reproductive interests.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-30 12:42:00 UTC
-
PLEASE YES. She’s even crazier than Sanders
PLEASE YES. She’s even crazier than Sanders.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-30 00:01:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046188216813047808
Reply addressees: @TwitterMoments
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032051483942871040
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032051483942871040
-
“Actually, it’s because we find barn animals disgusting.”
“Actually, it’s because we find barn animals disgusting.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-29 22:04:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046158700111691776
-
Sep 29, 2018, 6:10 PM
https://wapo.st/2zpJq5L?tid=ss_fb&utm_term=.0b07c31975f4Updated Sep 29, 2018, 6:10 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-29 18:10:00 UTC
-
Dylan Thomas’ Bias Toward Postmodernism and Authoritarianism
Yes on content, no on criticism. Demand for monopoly of positiva is different from necessity of monopoly of negativa. Make up whatever fairy stories incels desire. There is only one truth, and it is falsehood, and everything else is simply preference that expresses one’s reproductive interests.
—“It’s the problem of squishy definitions like “liberalism” opposed to clear operational definitions. Propertarianism, essentially, combines nomocracy and property, where by law is decided by calculating exchanges of demonstrated property (en toto). All the nuances and details boils down to different configurations (and preferences) in which one applies this basic fundamental notion.” — Bill Joslin —“It’s not a matter of “don’t have spiritual values.” We ALL have them. Trying to eradicate spiritual values is most likely a vain and pointless ambition.The issues are:1) It’s not always possible to meaningfully communicate spiritual values that aren’t already shared. And even when it is, it’s usually not possible to reach any sort of agreement.2) It’s very hard to check, correct, adjust, or update spiritual values that are wrong, bad, unsuitable, or out of date.Which is why maybe you might WANT a few autists around profaning the sacred with unnaturally precise and complete language.Otherwise your faulty spiritual values have no way to die, when they inevitably must, but to die with you…”—Ely Harman