Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • The False Promise of Universalism vs … Eugenics

    October 10th, 2018 9:50 AM

    —“Could we come up with a better term than ‘tribalism’ please?”— Marginal Revolution

    OMG….. How about we use operational (scientific language) instead of postmodern (pseudoscientific language)? I mean, is economics a science or a pseudoscience? The world doesn’t need more sophisms. |PACK| Family > Kin > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Civilization > Race = Markets for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law, trade policy ameliorating differences in purchasing power), producing universal EUGENIC reproduction. –versus– |HERD| Individual > Corporation > Universalism = NO MARKETS for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law), instead involuntary transfers between groups producing UNIVERSAL DYSGENIC REPRODUCTION. Economics if anything consists of the full accounting of costs. NOT THE CHERRY PICKING OF RETURNS INDEPENDENT OF COSTS. I don’t make mistakes such as these. The reason is that I don’t engage in cherry-picking (Pseudoscience) Justificationism (sophism) and Postmodern (denial and deceit) “empty verbalism” for the purpose of producing frames that perpetuate the frauds of involuntary transfer, and the spread of dysgenia. Simple facts: those groups that practiced eugenic reproduction under manorialism (east and west) succeeded precisely because of those eugenics, and those that did not, and still do not, are those that struggle. And those that were sold the false promise of universalism whether in the ancient world (the Abrahamic Dark Age and the destruction of all great civilizations of the ancient world), and in the Modern world (marxist-libertarian-postmodern-feminist destruction of the modern world) but lacked the reserve capital (europe, east asia), were sufficiently distracted by the false promise of pseudoscientific sophism, that they have missed the window for using the industrial and technological revolution to organize their societies for eugenic middle class reproduction. Reductive Explanation: The HERD (Universalist) doesn’t know it’s a HERD, but the PACK (Nationalist) knows it’s a pack, and the herd a herd. Selective use of economics to justify an instinct is just pseudoscience. Either you engage in full accounting or you don’t.  

  • October 10th, 2018 9:17 AM —“Curt, You sound like an AI raising a red flag”–F

    October 10th, 2018 9:17 AM

    —“Curt, You sound like an AI raising a red flag”–Fawzi M. Chala

    There is something uncomfortable about acknowledging the accuracy of that observation… lolz

  • Irony In ‘Holocaust’ Memes

    October 10th, 2018 4:14 PM

    ( The irony of the hard right using oven metaphors with utter confidence that they didn’t exist, and gas metaphors with utter confidence the only gas was used for delousing linens. And yes, I understand that the right wing mind loves irony and hyperbole. It’s still strange somehow. )

  • Irony In ‘Holocaust’ Memes

    October 10th, 2018 4:14 PM

    ( The irony of the hard right using oven metaphors with utter confidence that they didn’t exist, and gas metaphors with utter confidence the only gas was used for delousing linens. And yes, I understand that the right wing mind loves irony and hyperbole. It’s still strange somehow. )

  • ( The irony of the hard right using oven metaphors with utter confidence that th

    ( The irony of the hard right using oven metaphors with utter confidence that they didn’t exist, and gas metaphors with utter confidence the only gas was used for delousing linens. And yes, I understand that the right wing mind loves irony and hyperbole. It’s still strange somehow. )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 16:14:00 UTC

  • (Yes, but we are just joking about the meme of SJW’s being NPC’s. lol)

    (Yes, but we are just joking about the meme of SJW’s being NPC’s. lol)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 16:01:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050053808854880257

    Reply addressees: @JSp46305240

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050034553849548800


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050034553849548800

  • (Wondering how many people watching the movie “22 July” are rooting for Brevik.)

    (Wondering how many people watching the movie “22 July” are rooting for Brevik.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 15:47:00 UTC

  • 1) I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job not to

    1) I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job not to.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 15:02:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050038928512831490

    Reply addressees: @weltmord

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050034352137129984


    IN REPLY TO:

    @weltmord

    @curtdoolittle None of these three ideologies has anything to do with abrahamic religions.

    THE DOOLITTLE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND HE IS WRITING HIMSELF INTO NOT EVEN A SHALLOW BUT UNSUBSTANTIAL CRITIQUE OF RELIGION

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050034352137129984

  • @freewoes #FreeWoes

    @freewoes #FreeWoes https://twitter.com/freewoes/status/1049999870742786049

  • Hugs in advance. 😉

    Hugs in advance. 😉
    https://www.patreon.com/propertarianism


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 13:23:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050013982843650048

    Reply addressees: @AprioriTraditi1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050003165318238210


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050003165318238210