@Mises The wyrm has turned. We have our success. Why cling to falsehoods out of personal allegiance to mentors? We must surpass them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:14:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767001915959848960
@Mises The wyrm has turned. We have our success. Why cling to falsehoods out of personal allegiance to mentors? We must surpass them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:14:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767001915959848960
@mises We should be teaching that we finally solved the 2500 year-old problem,not trying to use Jewish Critique to prop up our past failures
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:12:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767001420889329665
@Mises Unnecessary: Misesian pseudoscience, and Rothbardian/Hoppiean justificationary rationalism. Anarchism: we solved the social sciences.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:11:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767001071482830848
@Mises Hoppe extends Locke/rothbard to commons. Ergo. Remove German/Jewish pseudoscience, and we get the missing science: social science.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:09:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767000590366801921
@Mises Hayek:rule-of-law=liberty. Mises: operationalism -ergo social science. Rothbard: extends Locke:Soc-sci. expressible as prop.rights.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:07:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767000207040978944
It’s not that I LIKE making Rothbardians look foolish. It’s that they need to look and feel foolish as much as marxists and neocons do.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 13:29:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766990498800148481
Retweeted Eli Harman (@MartianHoplite):
@curtdoolittle @timothyrauch @mamasaurusof2 @cmandrecyk @CookPolitical @dmataconis Canadians’ opinion of Trump is from how polite he isn’t.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 13:25:00 UTC
(Because the failure of the liberty movement is reducible in part to its construction as pseudoscience.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 10:51:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766950722009112576
Reply addressees: @PAKallman @BobMurphyEcon @mises
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766949726449131521
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766949726449131521
Mises was bad enough at philosophy, but could have been corrected. Rothbard ruined his legacy.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 10:47:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766949740751626240
Reply addressees: @PAKallman @BobMurphyEcon @mises
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766949017997615104
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766949017997615104
It’s not that I LIKE making Rothbardians look foolish. It’s that they need to look and feel foolish as much as marxists and neocons do.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 09:29:00 UTC