October 11th, 2018 3:31 PM COUNTERING RIGHT CRITICISM OF CULTURAL MARXISM ( In response to: https://www.facebook.com/pepe.escobar.77377/posts/10156644462266678 ) So you didn’t actually make an argument I can counter, other than “Misinterpreted” – when the universal criticism of the left is that while the right can understand the left (rationally) the left cannot comprehend the right (intuitionistically) and resorts to psychologisms (Critique). What outcomes, arguments, propositions, assumptions were misinterpreted? THE UNDERLYING ARGUMENT Pilpul consists of a technique using sophisms (“justificationism”). Critique consists of a technique by which straw-man criticism without providing an alternative construction, for the opposition to criticize, substitutes for argument. And Feminine Competitive Instinct relies on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossip, straw manning, and reputation destruction instead of competing with (answering) the objections put forth in the argument. Feminine group strategy relies on prosecution of reciprocity in support of advancing proportionality indirectly. These are all methods of sophomoric rhetorical fraud. They are instinctual. And they appear to have evolved to control alphas (reproductive choice). Whereas Aristotelianism, Empiricism, Scientific method, Economics, and Rule of law require Operational Language (Testimony), warranty, demonstrated due diligence, and active suppression against ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalisms, and deceit as means of demanding reciprocity. Conversely, Abrahamism (pilpul, critique, false history, supernaturalism), reformed into Marxism-Boasianism-Freudianism-(even Cantorian sets)-Adorno/Frankfurt practice of pseudoscience that advances the feminine reproductive and competitive strategy and the feminine method of speech, to undermine reciprocity and testability in order to prevent full accounting of merit. And when the pseudoscientific(marxist analysis) and pseudo-rational (dialectic) argument failed, the French postmodernists reformed into (resorted to) outright Denialism (iq, race, gender, culture, class, causality, truth, un- decidability etc). Which is what the Right Refers to as “Cultural Marxism” and the Academy, Media, State complex make use of these narratives (propaganda, cult mythology) in combination with the downward expansion of college and university education, to fund teaching of, research into, and the production of literature, and the creation multiple generations of new ‘cultists’.â¨â¨This activism resulted in the successful displacement of the aristocracy (military) from political rule, and the replacement of the church with the academy/media/state complex. And resulted in the incremental (quite intentional) selection of cases brought before the Supreme Court in order to undermine the constitution (via legislation from the bench) due to the weakness of the constitution not providing a vehicle for return of undecidable propositions to the legislature. The right has consistently resisted, and held onto the moral argument sufficiently to deny political power, (albeit in archaic enlightenment prose), but the left achieved through single motherhood expansion and underclass immigration, and involuntary transfer of reproduction to the lower classes through taxation, that which they could not achieve by ideas. This has resulted in a Racial Polity, and the racialization of both parties with single white women and vulnerable underclasses as the only race-defectors. So, the Right argument (Aristocratic-hierarchical, Meritocratic, Market, Rule of Law, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, and Eugenic), is not that there is some vast left conspiracy – because the right doesn’t believe the left (Feminine, Herd, Dysgenic) mind possesses any agency whatsoever (hence the evolution of the Useful Idiot label into the NPC Meme). But instead that the cult of supernaturalism was replaced first by a cult of pseudoscience, and having failed at pseudoscience, replaced by a cult of outright denialism. The fact that these sophomoric arguments (pilpul) were all produced using Critique, in support of the feminine reproductive strategy (proportionality of the herd), in order to circumvent rule of law by reciprocity (ancient customary law of tort), and to enforce discretionary rule instead,(despite that the country was designed as a ‘third way’ between authoritarian discretion of the aristocracy, and authoritarian socialism of the church.) Democracy is (majoritarian monopoly) little more than the search for power external to the market. The right attempts to preserve the market (meritocracy and reciprocity of the pack) while the left attempts to circumvent the market (equality and proportionality of the herd.) Yes there are the Soros’ of the world that do this by intent. By by and large the left is just lacking the right’s Agency, which is what separates right and left: Agency. [Left: Female Reproductive Strategy]: Consumption : Equality Devotion Proportionality [Libertarian: Unfranchised Male Reproductive Strategy]: Production: Reciprocity, Liberty [Conservative: Franchised (established) Male Reproductive Strategy]: Conservation: Reciprocity Hierarchy/Loyalty, Purity.â¨â¨ Arguably only libertarians only have any agency since they are the only faction with sufficient understanding of both economics and rule of law to possess it, but as a minority they are ineffective outside of think tanks and policy influence. The conservatives however remain dedicated to the individual as the central object of the law of tort; the family as the central unit of policy; and the civic order as the central unit of commons production; and the state limited to service as the insurer of last resort. Since this combination is a prescription for a eugenic social order, and that eugenic order (“manorialism”) was successful in both the far east and far west in sufficiently eugenic limitations on reproduction to produce a nearly completely middle class polity, this social order is both the origin of east and west prosperity, but in conflict with the expansion of single mothers, and third worlder underclasses without such genetic cultural traditional, and institutional histories. We provide agency through science: the use of correspondence with reality, using operational language to produce consistency between existence, action, perception, and intuition. And we use the scientific method to insure that the frauds sophisms, fictionalism, and outright deceits so common outside of the west, are incrementally suppressed. Unfortunately the continentals and the mesopotamians retain their sophisms, pseudosciences, and supernaturalisms, and their desperate followers try to bring moral FICTIONS into reality by the act of chanting them. “Thus endeth the lesson.” Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
by @[100009672279790:2048:Richard Nikoley] The problem here is that it’s crucial
by @[100009672279790:2048:Richard Nikoley]
The problem here is that it’s crucially important what values you’re acting (or fighting, or kicking teeth) FOR.
There is no virtue in combat for the sake of combat. That’s for Fight Club and everyone knows what the first rule of Fight Club is.
So, everyone fights. Everyone has a degree of blood lust. Everyone wants to kick in the teeth, bash heads and…
“Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats.” — H. L. Mencken
But for what? Let’s be somewhat explicit in dialectic fashion: thesis —> Antithesis —> Synthesis.
REPUBLICAN THESIS (loosely, not all-inclusive)
– Traditional American Dream
– Traditional American Values including core familial values
– Traditional forms of child learning, typically including light religious indoctrination
– Raising sons and daughters to embrace traditional familial male and female roles
– Know-How, Do It Yourself Self sufficiency, including pride as a virtue to be reluctance to ask for help
– Business, productivity, entrepreneurship, wealth building
– Minimal government interference
– Tough on true crime (murder, kidnapping, rape, theft, fraud, etc.)
– Charity and missionaryism
– Closed borders; be selective and cherry pick immigrants
DEMOCRAT ANTITHESIS
– The American Dream leaves too many poor, uneducated, and genetically IQ handicapped behind and you should feel ashamed of that
– Traditional family values hold down girls and women from reaching their true potential intellectually, academically, and independent financially
– Traditional child rearing tends to empower male children and handicap female children such that they are dependent on males
– Self sufficiency, know-how, and self dealing, etc. in the trades disadvantages the poor, uneducated, IQ handicapped and so collective bargaining through unions on the private and public levels are necessary, as is affirmative action to award the less fortunate at the expense of penalizing the naturally selected
– Capitalism in general places the means of production and prosperity in the hands of entrepreneurs who may not be market driven but politically driven, so fascism is necessary (quibbles I’m sure, but state control through vast regulation of quasi-private enterprise IS what fascism IS)
– Maximum governmental regulation (fascism) is necessary and the best means of producing that outcome is through political rent-seeking behavior, turning market entrepreneurs into political entrepreneurs
– Criminal prosecution is a tool used by the right to control the underclasses
– Grassroots charity comes with ideological strings attached, usually religious and so, this too ought to be a secular and state team effort with corporate charity and United Nations oversight rather than individuals and small groups seeing a need and assuaging it to their abilities
– Open borders; lift the poor and underprivileged
…Not all-inclusive, such as, strong feminist activism, queer agenda, transgender stuff, etc.
In terms of the dialectic synthesis, that’s libertarianism. Strong on markets, self-sufficiency, entrepreneurship, minimal government interference, private charity…but also live and let live on the social issues.
The question is, without the Republican and Democrat labels, the memes, the Media, entertainment, and Hollywood narrative crafting either way, which set of values do you more viscerally identify with that the other?
Hey, Curt Doolittle, your stream of consciousness and/or sweat and tears lists are always more comprehensive than mine. Anything to add, retract, nuance, etc?
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 18:29:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_424209615
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_4242096158391926784_o_10156700426017264.jpg —“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– @[100024151412040:2048:John Mark]
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113James SantagataNot surprising to see Curt quoted at all. It is actually brilliant by Goodwin, because he can surface this with a great quote/insight without mentioning Propertarianism, etc. yet Curt is a Google away. At same time, in typical Leftie bastion, I have been shocked to see the impact we are all having with them having to reconsider or try to counter “racism” as simply an outcome of “patterns and priors/probabilties”, and their introducing “natural law” — they use “” to show that they are not comfortable with it. But it is there.Oct 11, 2018, 6:43 PMJames SantagataMy view from Google……The people that matter, Left, Right, Center, will Google Curt, without “”….. and what they will find….. twitter, propertarian website and a couple youtube videos, and then pandora’s box is wide open.Oct 11, 2018, 6:45 PMAndrew ClaytonIt’s a pretty good quote :)Oct 11, 2018, 6:49 PMJon JonathanPretty on point for the NY CompostOct 11, 2018, 7:08 PMJohn MarkCurt should be quoted extensively by our descendants throughout their schooling.Oct 11, 2018, 7:16 PMCurt Doolittleit’s different in the USA. I’m an intellectual. We don’t arrest intellectuals. We arrest activists and organizers and people who do things.Oct 11, 2018, 7:31 PMSteve SlonkyI’d like to see your trial CurtOct 11, 2018, 7:37 PMCurt Doolittle( I have been told by multiple lawyers over the decades “The last thing I will do is put you on the stand just so you can make a circus of the courtroom.” Or “There is no way I’m putting you on the stand.” )Oct 11, 2018, 7:44 PMAndrew ClaytonGutless lawyers hahaOct 11, 2018, 7:47 PMCurt DoolittleI’m bad enough in deposition. Mostly because the attorneys can’t believe I won’t result to practicalities. I mean, last big suit I had, I said I was willing to take it to a jury and lose. If you maintain the moral high ground it is very difficult to use the system against you. I trust the jury. That’s what scares people. Juries are random numbers. Law may be law but juries will go with the moral high ground.
Only reason I got screwed in my divorce was that they forced me to choose between cancer surgery or holding out for six months to a year until I could have it. I was so sick you can’t imagine. I couldn’t stay healthy and ‘clear minded’ for more than two weeks at a time. The fact that the court tolerated using that tactic is one of the reasons I’m determined to revolt and reform the system so that such nonsense doesn’t happen to anyone else.Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMJon JonathanI picture it going like the time Evola was on trial.
“During his trial in 1951, Evola denied being a fascist and instead referred to himself as a “superfascist”. “Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMCurt Doolittlenot gutless. smart.Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMIgor RogovFamily courts are totally parasitised by the Left waging their war against “entitled white male”, even more here in Australia, and the lawyers are generally complicit in it, with few notable exceptions. Application of adversarial court system, feminist agenda and government oversight in shape of social workers and various government – affiliated agencies to family law is a true goldmine for the judiciary, social worker’s bloated bureaucracy, mediocre psychologists and billion dollar “Duluth model” industry. And it is absolutely ruinous for the nation, and for many individuals.Oct 11, 2018, 8:20 PMChristopher HallMost recently the good people at RAMOct 11, 2018, 8:39 PMHoward Van Der KlauwIgor Rogov exactly and completely trueOct 11, 2018, 8:40 PMJoe Boyumboxed wine resistance versus AR-15 nationalismOct 11, 2018, 10:58 PMAnjin BodhisattvaIs it ok to like both?Oct 12, 2018, 1:52 AMJoe FossReminds me when Styx pointed out MSM figures probably keep an eye on guys like him. Looks like you’re on their radar, tooOct 12, 2018, 8:03 AMMurphy CellNice to see an old Connecticut boy making waves with the Normies!Oct 12, 2018, 10:21 AMKevin CoxFranzia and SSRIs = hardened revolutionaries.Oct 13, 2018, 1:49 AM—“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– John Mark
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 18:26:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_424209615
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_4242096158391926784_o_10156700426017264.jpg —“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– @[100024151412040:2048:John Mark]
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113James SantagataNot surprising to see Curt quoted at all. It is actually brilliant by Goodwin, because he can surface this with a great quote/insight without mentioning Propertarianism, etc. yet Curt is a Google away. At same time, in typical Leftie bastion, I have been shocked to see the impact we are all having with them having to reconsider or try to counter “racism” as simply an outcome of “patterns and priors/probabilties”, and their introducing “natural law” — they use “” to show that they are not comfortable with it. But it is there.Oct 11, 2018, 6:43 PMJames SantagataMy view from Google……The people that matter, Left, Right, Center, will Google Curt, without “”….. and what they will find….. twitter, propertarian website and a couple youtube videos, and then pandora’s box is wide open.Oct 11, 2018, 6:45 PMAndrew ClaytonIt’s a pretty good quote :)Oct 11, 2018, 6:49 PMJon JonathanPretty on point for the NY CompostOct 11, 2018, 7:08 PMJohn MarkCurt should be quoted extensively by our descendants throughout their schooling.Oct 11, 2018, 7:16 PMCurt Doolittleit’s different in the USA. I’m an intellectual. We don’t arrest intellectuals. We arrest activists and organizers and people who do things.Oct 11, 2018, 7:31 PMSteve SlonkyI’d like to see your trial CurtOct 11, 2018, 7:37 PMCurt Doolittle( I have been told by multiple lawyers over the decades “The last thing I will do is put you on the stand just so you can make a circus of the courtroom.” Or “There is no way I’m putting you on the stand.” )Oct 11, 2018, 7:44 PMAndrew ClaytonGutless lawyers hahaOct 11, 2018, 7:47 PMCurt DoolittleI’m bad enough in deposition. Mostly because the attorneys can’t believe I won’t result to practicalities. I mean, last big suit I had, I said I was willing to take it to a jury and lose. If you maintain the moral high ground it is very difficult to use the system against you. I trust the jury. That’s what scares people. Juries are random numbers. Law may be law but juries will go with the moral high ground.
Only reason I got screwed in my divorce was that they forced me to choose between cancer surgery or holding out for six months to a year until I could have it. I was so sick you can’t imagine. I couldn’t stay healthy and ‘clear minded’ for more than two weeks at a time. The fact that the court tolerated using that tactic is one of the reasons I’m determined to revolt and reform the system so that such nonsense doesn’t happen to anyone else.Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMJon JonathanI picture it going like the time Evola was on trial.
“During his trial in 1951, Evola denied being a fascist and instead referred to himself as a “superfascist”. “Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMCurt Doolittlenot gutless. smart.Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMAmir MetzgerSome lawyers are the most fucked up people in existence, no questionOct 11, 2018, 7:52 PMIgor RogovFamily courts are totally parasitised by the Left waging their war against “entitled white male”, even more here in Australia, and the lawyers are generally complicit in it, with few notable exceptions. Application of adversarial court system, feminist agenda and government oversight in shape of social workers and various government – affiliated agencies to family law is a true goldmine for the judiciary, social worker’s bloated bureaucracy, mediocre psychologists and billion dollar “Duluth model” industry. And it is absolutely ruinous for the nation, and for many individuals.Oct 11, 2018, 8:20 PMChristopher HallMost recently the good people at RAMOct 11, 2018, 8:39 PMHoward Van Der KlauwIgor Rogov exactly and completely trueOct 11, 2018, 8:40 PMJoe Boyumboxed wine resistance versus AR-15 nationalismOct 11, 2018, 10:58 PMAnjin BodhisattvaIs it ok to like both?Oct 12, 2018, 1:52 AMJoe FossReminds me when Styx pointed out MSM figures probably keep an eye on guys like him. Looks like you’re on their radar, tooOct 12, 2018, 8:03 AMMurphy CellNice to see an old Connecticut boy making waves with the Normies!Oct 12, 2018, 10:21 AMKevin CoxFranzia and SSRIs = hardened revolutionaries.Oct 13, 2018, 1:49 AM—“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– John Mark
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 18:26:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/43684184_10156700426027264_42420961
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/43684184_10156700426027264_4242096158391926784_o_10156700426017264.jpg —“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– @[100024151412040:2048:John Mark]
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113James SantagataNot surprising to see Curt quoted at all. It is actually brilliant by Goodwin, because he can surface this with a great quote/insight without mentioning Propertarianism, etc. yet Curt is a Google away. At same time, in typical Leftie bastion, I have been shocked to see the impact we are all having with them having to reconsider or try to counter “racism” as simply an outcome of “patterns and priors/probabilties”, and their introducing “natural law” — they use “” to show that they are not comfortable with it. But it is there.Oct 11, 2018 6:43pmJames SantagataMy view from Google……The people that matter, Left, Right, Center, will Google Curt, without “”….. and what they will find….. twitter, propertarian website and a couple youtube videos, and then pandora’s box is wide open.Oct 11, 2018 6:45pmAndrew ClaytonIt’s a pretty good quote :)Oct 11, 2018 6:49pmJon JonathanPretty on point for the NY CompostOct 11, 2018 7:08pmJohnathon FashI’m just happy they didn’t misquote you. cheers mate. you deserve it.Oct 11, 2018 7:14pmJohn MarkCurt should be quoted extensively by our descendants throughout their schooling.Oct 11, 2018 7:16pmAlba RisingCurt you’re gonna get arrested. :/
Maybe it’s different in the US but I was detained for much much less.Oct 11, 2018 7:19pmAlba RisingAlthough getting arrested would be great for your philosophy I would prefer you are not.Oct 11, 2018 7:21pmCurt Doolittleit’s different in the USA. I’m an intellectual. We don’t arrest intellectuals. We arrest activists and organizers and people who do things.Oct 11, 2018 7:31pmSteve SlonkyI’d like to see your trial CurtOct 11, 2018 7:37pmCurt Doolittle( I have been told by multiple lawyers over the decades “The last thing I will do is put you on the stand just so you can make a circus of the courtroom.” Or “There is no way I’m putting you on the stand.” )Oct 11, 2018 7:44pmAndrew ClaytonGutless lawyers hahaOct 11, 2018 7:47pmCurt DoolittleI’m bad enough in deposition. Mostly because the attorneys can’t believe I won’t result to practicalities. I mean, last big suit I had, I said I was willing to take it to a jury and lose. If you maintain the moral high ground it is very difficult to use the system against you. I trust the jury. That’s what scares people. Juries are random numbers. Law may be law but juries will go with the moral high ground.
Only reason I got screwed in my divorce was that they forced me to choose between cancer surgery or holding out for six months to a year until I could have it. I was so sick you can’t imagine. I couldn’t stay healthy and ‘clear minded’ for more than two weeks at a time. The fact that the court tolerated using that tactic is one of the reasons I’m determined to revolt and reform the system so that such nonsense doesn’t happen to anyone else.Oct 11, 2018 7:50pmJon JonathanI picture it going like the time Evola was on trial.
“During his trial in 1951, Evola denied being a fascist and instead referred to himself as a “superfascist”. “Oct 11, 2018 7:50pmCurt Doolittlenot gutless. smart.Oct 11, 2018 7:50pmClaire AdelsteinSome lawyers are the most fucked up people in existence, no questionOct 11, 2018 7:52pmIgor RogovFamily courts are totally parasitised by the Left waging their war against “entitled white male”, even more here in Australia, and the lawyers are generally complicit in it, with few notable exceptions. Application of adversarial court system, feminist agenda and government oversight in shape of social workers and various government – affiliated agencies to family law is a true goldmine for the judiciary, social worker’s bloated bureaucracy, mediocre psychologists and billion dollar “Duluth model” industry. And it is absolutely ruinous for the nation, and for many individuals.Oct 11, 2018 8:20pmChristopher HallMost recently the good people at RAMOct 11, 2018 8:39pmHoward Van Der Klauw@[596399623:2048:Igor Rogov] exactly and completely trueOct 11, 2018 8:40pmJoe Boyumboxed wine resistance versus AR-15 nationalismOct 11, 2018 10:58pmAnjin BodhisattvaIs it ok to like both?Oct 12, 2018 1:52amJoe FossReminds me when Styx pointed out MSM figures probably keep an eye on guys like him. Looks like you’re on their radar, tooOct 12, 2018 8:03amMurphy CellNice to see an old Connecticut boy making waves with the Normies!Oct 12, 2018 10:21amKevin CoxFranzia and SSRIs = hardened revolutionaries.Oct 13, 2018 1:49am—“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– John Mark
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 18:26:00 UTC
-
POSTMODERN, CRITIQUE, PILPUL: HICKS, MACDONALD, AND DOOLITTLE Understanding of P
POSTMODERN, CRITIQUE, PILPUL: HICKS, MACDONALD, AND DOOLITTLE
Understanding of Postmodernism spreads via Hicks. Critique by Macdonald. I do the entire history of Pilpul (sophism), Critique(gossip), the Fictionalisms (pseudoscience, pseudorationalism-sophism, and supernaturalism-occultism) and their use as vehicles for loading, framing, overloading, and suggestion for the purpose of generating moral hazard that can be profited from by fraud. This includes Abrahamism, Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism. Now, we know what the left does now and how they do it – and we have produced a science out of testimony to stop it. The only challenge left is extending the law of involuntary warranty from goods and services to speech – thereby limiting public speech to that which is warrantable, and restoring defamation. This will reverse the century and a half of the industrialization of lying.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 17:34:00 UTC
-
COUNTERING RIGHT CRITICISM OF CULTURAL MARXISM ( In response to: ) So you didn’t
COUNTERING RIGHT CRITICISM OF CULTURAL MARXISM
( In response to: https://www.facebook.com/pepe.escobar.77377/posts/10156644462266678 )
So you didn’t actually make an argument I can counter, other than “Misinterpreted” – when the universal criticism of the left is that while the right can understand the left (rationally) the left cannot comprehend the right (intuitionistically) and resorts to psychologisms (Critique). What outcomes, arguments, propositions, assumptions were misinterpreted?
THE UNDERLYING ARGUMENT
Pilpul consists of a technique using sophisms (“justificationism”). Critique consists of a technique by which straw-man criticism without providing an alternative construction, for the opposition to criticize, substitutes for argument. And Feminine Competitive Instinct relies on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossip, straw manning, and reputation destruction instead of competing with (answering) the objections put forth in the argument. Feminine group strategy relies on prosecution of reciprocity in support of advancing proportionality indirectly. These are all methods of sophomoric rhetorical fraud. They are instinctual. And they appear to have evolved to control alphas (reproductive choice).
Whereas Aristotelianism, Empiricism, Scientific method, Economics, and Rule of law require Operational Language (Testimony), warranty, demonstrated due diligence, and active suppression against ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalisms, and deceit as means of demanding reciprocity.
Conversely, Abrahamism (pilpul, critique, false history, supernaturalism), reformed into Marxism-Boasianism-Freudianism-(even Cantorian sets)-Adorno/Frankfurt practice of pseudoscience that advances the feminine reproductive and competitive strategy and the feminine method of speech, to undermine reciprocity and testability in order to prevent full accounting of merit. And when the pseudoscientific(marxist analysis) and pseudo-rational (dialectic) argument failed, the French postmodernists reformed into (resorted to) outright Denialism (iq, race, gender, culture, class, causality, truth, un- decidability etc). Which is what the Right Refers to as “Cultural Marxism” and the Academy, Media, State complex make use of these narratives (propaganda, cult mythology) in combination with the downward expansion of college and university education, to fund teaching of, research into, and the production of literature, and the creation multiple generations of new ‘cultists’. This activism resulted in the successful displacement of the aristocracy (military) from political rule, and the replacement of the church with the academy/media/state complex. And resulted in the incremental (quite intentional) selection of cases brought before the Supreme Court in order to undermine the constitution (via legislation from the bench) due to the weakness of the constitution not providing a vehicle for return of undecidable propositions to the legislature.
The right has consistently resisted, and held onto the moral argument sufficiently to deny political power, (albeit in archaic enlightenment prose), but the left achieved through single motherhood expansion and underclass immigration, and involuntary transfer of reproduction to the lower classes through taxation, that which they could not achieve by ideas. This has resulted in a Racial Polity, and the racialization of both parties with single white women and vulnerable underclasses as the only race-defectors.
So, the Right argument (Aristocratic-hierarchical, Meritocratic, Market, Rule of Law, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, and Eugenic), is not that there is some vast left conspiracy – because the right doesn’t believe the left (Feminine, Herd, Dysgenic) mind possesses any agency whatsoever (hence the evolution of the Useful Idiot label into the NPC Meme). But instead that the cult of supernaturalism was replaced first by a cult of pseudoscience, and having failed at pseudoscience, replaced by a cult of outright denialism. The fact that these sophomoric arguments (pilpul) were all produced using Critique, in support of the feminine reproductive strategy (proportionality of the herd), in order to circumvent rule of law by reciprocity (ancient customary law of tort), and to enforce discretionary rule instead,(despite that the country was designed as a ‘third way’ between authoritarian discretion of the aristocracy, and authoritarian socialism of the church.)
Democracy is (majoritarian monopoly) little more than the search for power external to the market. The right attempts to preserve the market (meritocracy and reciprocity of the pack) while the left attempts to circumvent the market (equality and proportionality of the herd.)
Yes there are the Soros’ of the world that do this by intent. By by and large the left is just lacking the right’s Agency, which is what separates right and left: Agency.
[Left: Female Reproductive Strategy]: Consumption : Equality Devotion Proportionality
[Libertarian: Unfranchised Male Reproductive Strategy]: Production: Reciprocity, Liberty
[Conservative: Franchised (established) Male Reproductive Strategy]: Conservation: Reciprocity Hierarchy/Loyalty, Purity.
Arguably only libertarians only have any agency since they are the only faction with sufficient understanding of both economics and rule of law to possess it, but as a minority they are ineffective outside of think tanks and policy influence. The conservatives however remain dedicated to the individual as the central object of the law of tort; the family as the central unit of policy; and the civic order as the central unit of commons production; and the state limited to service as the insurer of last resort.
Since this combination is a prescription for a eugenic social order, and that eugenic order (“manorialism”) was successful in both the far east and far west in sufficiently eugenic limitations on reproduction to produce a nearly completely middle class polity, this social order is both the origin of east and west prosperity, but in conflict with the expansion of single mothers, and third worlder underclasses without such genetic cultural traditional, and institutional histories.
We provide agency through science: the use of correspondence with reality, using operational language to produce consistency between existence, action, perception, and intuition. And we use the scientific method to insure that the frauds sophisms, fictionalism, and outright deceits so common outside of the west, are incrementally suppressed. Unfortunately the continentals and the mesopotamians retain their sophisms, pseudosciences, and supernaturalisms, and their desperate followers try to bring moral FICTIONS into reality by the act of chanting them.
“Thus endeth the lesson.”
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 15:31:00 UTC
-
guilty as charged. 😉
guilty as charged. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 11:50:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050352894757744640
Reply addressees: @MartialSociety
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050179838886039554
IN REPLY TO:
@MartialSociety
@curtdoolittle But not really: https://t.co/nP9WJdiW4A
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050179838886039554
-
EDUCATION IS JUST LEFTIST MALWARE by James Santagata What you received was worse
EDUCATION IS JUST LEFTIST MALWARE
by James Santagata
What you received was worse than being deprived of an education. If you were simply deprived of an education, it would be a fairly simple matter to apply yourself, and remedy those gaps or that deprivation. What you were given was Mental Malware which includes desensitization scripts in the form of Mental Root Kits. Extremely hard to identify, surface, and remedy. So rather than someone not teaching you how to read a map, they gave you a fucked up map to begin with ,and then instructed you how to read it improperly (the Sun rises in the West and sets in the South, and that you should never question the map — if you come across a Ranger, an authority figure or even Smoky the Bear, listen closely for instructions. Then they sent you in the wrong direction for those 12 years. So even if you figure it out, you have to backtrack, lost time, energy and earnings to back to where you would be if you never went to school! Except now you are exhausted, pissed, distrustful, and have to fight cognitive dissonance. If they simply gave you no “education” you wouldn’t have to unlearn, and unlink the malware.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 11:45:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43660190_10156699538742264_257065189
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43660190_10156699538742264_2570651893613199360_n_10156699538737264.jpg HYPERBOLE BEING ILLUSTRATIVE…
(humor)Lan KenJumping out of a helicopter, or giving someone a free helicopter ride? Curt DoolittleOct 11, 2018, 11:53 AMWilliam L. BengeStoic levitate like mf, monk be like dont even.Oct 11, 2018, 12:17 PMFrank Luca PacioliToo illustrative to ignore ,thought unthinkable.Oct 11, 2018, 12:30 PMHYPERBOLE BEING ILLUSTRATIVE…
(humor)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 11:29:00 UTC