Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • Is The White Race Violent Naturally Or Were They Taught To Be?

    I’m going to give you the best, most scientific answer that is currently available. You may or may not like it. But to the best of my knowledge it’s unassailable.

    1. The white race is empirically less violent than all other races. (sorry. fact.) We currently attribute this to the facts that (a) limited survival of the underclasses in harsh winters, (b) the aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year (heavy intolerance for crime), (c) high sexual dimorphism combined with lower levels of testosterone and therefore lower levels of impulsivity and aggression, (d) higher demonstrated creativity which appears to be a genetically influenced personality trait (curiosity, ‘worry’, and industriousness). (e) greater freedom (for men) to compete in the dominance hierarchy.
    2. The white race is empirically superior at the application technology, voluntary cooperation, planning, and maneuver to the use of violence, thereby allowing smaller numbers of warriors to defeat superior and wealthier numbers.
    3. The white race has empirically used the application of violence to create markets that in turn increase wealth.
    4. The white race’s superiority in ancient and modern ages is because of the use of violence and technology to create markets.
    5. The white race’s superiority at producing arts, sciences, and technologies is because of their discovery of ‘deflationary truth’. (What we call scientific or empirical truth, that evolved from ‘reporting’ or ‘testifying’ rather than opining, elaborating, or conflating – regardless of cost to the self or others.)
    6. The white race’s discovery of ‘deflationary truth’ was caused by the use of the militia, that indoctrinated all free men into the use of military and technological epistemology. This mean that all mean of property were trained to some degree, and all the wealthier families were professionally trained, to use maneuver,
    7. The white race’s use of militia forced meritocracy, and meritocracy forced ‘sovereignty’, and sovereignty forced the natural law of voluntary reciprocity, and use of the natural law forced markets in everything: the jury, freedom of association, of cooperation, of cooperative production, of reproduction (Marriage), of production of commons (government), of polities (competing rule).
    8. The white race (North Sea Peoples) evolved the only government without governors: Rule of Law, by Natural Law, incrementally discovered by independent professional judges, and recorded in the Common Law of Torts, with judicial decidability provided by the changes in state of Property in Toto, where Property in Toto was determined by the bearing of costs to obtain an interest without imposing a cost upon the costs born by others. This form of law evolves faster than all alternatives, and leaves the least opportunity for the evolution of all forms of parasitism and predation. (Or it did until 20th democracy eliminated Rule of Law.)
    9. So to answer the question, while whites are demonstrably less violent, they are demonstrably more cooperative, with demonstrably higher trust in one another, producing lower risk and friction, allowing greater risk, allowing greater returns, and thereby evolving technologies both institutional, normative, commercial, and technological, faster than all other civilizations. This is why the west, despite being on the edge of the bronze age, evolved fastest in the ancient world, and fastest in the modern world, with the dark ages of religiously enforced ignorance causing a thousand year delay in world innovation.

      However, it is probably more correct to view white people as more patient and disciplined and industrious – probably due to four or more millennia of selection pressures above the 40th parallel – and therefore suppressing petty violence in exchange for expression of superior exceptional violence. But again, this may be for the simple reason that except for Han, Korean, and the Japanese, White People are the most genetically homogenous, genetically isolated, genetically domesticated, for the simple reason that they have systematically eradicated their lower classes.
    10. The white race was able to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, poverty, starvation, and disease, one civilization at a time, by the application of sovereignty (property), markets, technology, truth, using violence to do so. Evolution is unkind to primitive organisms. primitive social organizations, and primitive ideas.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine

    https://www.quora.com/Is-the-white-race-violent-naturally-or-were-they-taught-to-be

  • “How does western value fit in a non globalized world? Or do you think your answ

    —“How does western value fit in a non globalized world? Or do you think your answer lies in a new rendition of re-western globalization?”—Justin Fortune

    The west ceases attempting to colonize other civilizations in the name of commerce (and democracy), prohibits its own colonization, and we continue the re-emergence of the balance of civilizations and balance of powers that has been the norm in all history aside from a few similar periods of rapid technological change.

    I mean, that’s whats happening now. The west’s technological advantage is dissipating rapidly, and therefore its economic advantage, leaving only its institutional and demographic advantage.

    Given that technological advantages are easily transferrable, institutional more difficult, and demographic and cultural advantages nearly impossible to replicate, then this is the only method of maintaining the western relative standard of living.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-18 06:41:00 UTC

  • I suppose it’s hard to accept, that after a century of selling the fictitious vi

    I suppose it’s hard to accept, that after a century of selling the fictitious virtues of the genetic underclasses in order to profit from their consumption, indoctrination, and votes, that the single best action we can take to improve the lot of individual, family, community, nation, and mankind, is to reduce their number.

    World Systems Theory is an odd, Marxist, term for expressing evolution by the replacement of physical warfare with economic warfare, with informational warfare, with reproductive warfare. But evolution remains evolution; devolution devolution; and extinction extinction whether early or late in the process of speciation.

    But then, like the first generations of Abrahamism, Marxism and Critical Theory are just another form of information warfare in which the false promise of universal equality replaces the false promise of socialist prosperity, which replaced the false promise of heavenly life after death.

    Evolve. Kill them all.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-17 09:01:00 UTC

  • (((Ancestry))) continues the ‘diversity’ agenda by suggesting that you share gen

    (((Ancestry))) continues the ‘diversity’ agenda by suggesting that you share genes with other regions rather than that other regions share common ancestors, and that the survival of similar genes from common ancestors is both selected and random.

    Use 23andMe instead.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-16 17:57:00 UTC

  • Kin, Army, Nation, Corporation, Empire. When does the order defeat the the kin?

    Kin, Army, Nation, Corporation, Empire. When does the order defeat the the kin?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-14 14:40:00 UTC

  • POSTWAR POLICY IN ITS HISTORIC CONTEXT (must read) —“What would you say to a m

    POSTWAR POLICY IN ITS HISTORIC CONTEXT

    (must read)

    —“What would you say to a military analyst that said, you know the US has followed this model of non-intervention for the past 2 decades and look what we have, we need to get serious about military action.”– Peter Boettke

    Peter then goes to compare the post-cold-war era (the communist era, now the islamic war era) military policy to our current limited use of laissez faire economics: more of a leaning from the center than a commitment regardless of current costs.

    1) THE MEANING OF POLICY.

    Policy: “All other things being equal we prefer X over Y. But we are not utopian, ideological, stupid or reckless, but empirical, and so all other things are not as often equal as we might like or imagine.”

    So the application of set logic rather than rational choice to the meaning of ‘policy’ is a Black or White fallacy akin to moral fallacy akin to criminal fallacy: non intervention, good character, moral action, and non-criminal action does not mean all of us fail to intervene, to possess episodes of poor character, to act immorally, and to break petty crimes, or in extremes all of the above.

    From the military POV their policy and our policy has in fact, been non-intervention except when we cannot avoid it for some political or economic or strategic reason. This differs from the cold war policy of continuous intervention in order to stop the spread of world communism.

    2) THE APPLICATION OF THAT POLICY TO INCREASING RATHER THAN DECREASING RESISTANCE

    A policy of intervention over the past 20 years by which we treated islamism with the same interventionism that we did world communism (whose tactics the islamists adopted) might or might not have produced superior results to a policy of non-intervention.

    From the military POV we took our cold war peace dividend and squandered it, since communism in secondary civilizations merely migrated into islamism in tertiary civilizations – as we should have rationally expected it to.

    Modernity is … challenging to male status because modernity decreases the number of options for climbing the male dominance hierarchy to the left of the curve. The importance of male status increases with a decline in economic, emotional, and intellectual ability. So we should see and do see increasing hostility to modernity in both ruling and lower classes, and the affinity for modernity limited to the genetic middle classes.

    This is the correct model for interpreting resistance to modernity. Islamic modernization should, by this analysis, make communist modernization a trivial cost by comparison.

    If you want to create a war, then remove food, shelter, labor, or ability to climb a dominance hierarchy from the classes who are most dependent upon marginal food, labor and ability to climb the dominance hierarchy, and their ruling classes who profit from (if only in status) from the current order.

    Conversely, if you want to mobilize a war, either threaten such conditions, or offer an aspirational means by which to circumvent them. Men change state in social orders in order to climb a dominance hierarchy or prevent themselves from falling from their position in it.

    3) THE CYCLES OF HISTORY: A REACTION TO ARISTOCRACY

    Anglos entered modernity first, adapted first, and the french (moralism), the germans (rationalism) the jews (secular religion we call communism) all resisted modernity accordingly. The jews succeeded in gaining temporary power in Russia, and their success spread to china, and then world wide, in the greatest murder since the islamic expansion,(together which has been worse than the black plague).

    If you learn anything from my work, I hope it is that the ‘enlightenment’ or the ‘restoration of western civilization’ is still in progress, and spreading as did agrarianism, as did the bronze age, and transforming the world with our modern technologies. And that the wars of europe, revolutions in christianity, communism/socialism/libertinism/neoconservatism, islamism, and whatever follows them, are continuations of the same process of disruption we call the enlightenment.

    And that the Enlightenment, the Greco-Roman Age, and The Invention of Aristocracy under the Aryan Expansion, constitute a single movement that the rest of the world aggressively resists: the transcendence of man through the continuous application of markets in everything, and the continuous disruption caused by those markets, as males find continuous new opportunities to climb the dominance hierarchy, and obtain wealth, status and women.

    Aryanism = Markets and Markets = Merit, and the beast we call homo-sapiens-sapiens does not seem to like this model outside of the european peoples.

    The Grand Question that remains, is only whether this tendency is cultural, demographic, or genetic. I have been an advocate of the fact that it is only necessary for it to be cultural and demographic. However, the science is not in my favor, as most recent genetic evidence is reinforcing the genetic contingent’s argument.

    If so, and it is genetic, we are the only peoples who can drag mankind out of the status of animal and into transcendence. If as I suspect, it has always been demographic, then that explains the cultural model, as well as the genetic.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-14 10:21:00 UTC

  • “The only difference between class and caste is that one allows for more excepti

    —“The only difference between class and caste is that one allows for more exceptions in movement.”—Jerrick Harald

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-12 12:31:00 UTC

  • The Languages: Myth, Religion, Literature, Philosophy, Science, Engineering, and

    The Languages: Myth, Religion, Literature, Philosophy, Science, Engineering, and Law.

    **Intellectual History Must Include All**

    And the sequence I’ve listed them in matters a great deal.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-12 10:50:00 UTC

  • THE EVOLUTION OF RELATIONSHIPS Pairing off was a prehistoric adaptation. Marital

    THE EVOLUTION OF RELATIONSHIPS

    Pairing off was a prehistoric adaptation.

    Marital relationships, an agrarian invention.

    Nuclear marriage relationships, a medieval invention.

    Romantic relationships a modern invention.

    Friendship relationships a mid 20th century invention.

    Temporary relationships a current invention.

    Marriage and offspring are not luxury goods. They are survival goods.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-10 14:53:00 UTC

  • RESTORATION OF ARYANISM (MARKETS)? Did ya’ notice how often I fight against mono

    RESTORATION OF ARYANISM (MARKETS)?

    Did ya’ notice how often I fight against monopoly and justificationism, and instead fight for markets and survival from criticism? Did you think maybe that’s the reason for the west’s success. And that the “Monopoly” of ‘best’ that we obtained through (a) universal enfranchisement, and (b) cosmopolitan pseudoscience (marxism, freudianism, boazianism, frankfurt cultural marxism), was the reason for the west’s decline.

    Women ‘buy’ what they feel. That was the mistake. The Roman Mistake. The Germanic Mistake.

    Fool me once, shame on you

    Fool me twice, shame on me.

    This time we end the lies forever.

    NATURAL LAW AND TESTIMONIAL TRUTH.

    IMPOSED BY VIOLENCE.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-10 12:58:00 UTC