TURNING JEWISH PHILOSOPHY ON ITS HEAD, AND THEREBY UNDERSTANDING OUR OWN ARISTOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY It’s not hard. You can turn all jewish philosophy on its head: A poor, migratory, pastoral people, with high inbreeding, high clannishness, reverse sexual dimorphism, and who experienced their age of transformation as slaves, never adapted to land-holding, or developed land holding virtues, norms, institutions, laws and traditions, nor through selection developed a masculine aristocracy, or permanent warrior class, then industrialized the lying and wishful thinking of slaves, and upon obtaining literacy, selected for amplifying all their reverse sexual dimorphism (female reproductive strategy), and supporting values, and through their males, weaponized the reproductive strategy of women: wishful thinking, gossip, and deceit, by which to bring about a restored primitive matrilineal order. In other words, just as women evolved gossip to rally males against alphas, jews continued this strategy of gossiping Just as women make their men weak if give the opportunity, jews make their hosts weak if given the opportunity. Just as women ridicule, shame, gossip, and rally, jews do so but on an industrial scale with great deal of sophistication. Just as women are superior at speech and men at action, jews are superior at speech, and aristocracy superior in action. Just as women are petty and treat each other horribly if empowered, jews are petty and treat others horribly if empowered. We have already had one jewish empire: the soviet union. And we must never have that happen to mankind again. So no more Abrahamism: judaism, christianity, islam. So no more Cosmopolitanism: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard, Rand, of the millions of jewish propagandists. No more postmodernism: Foucault, Derrida, and all. No more feminism and its history of lies. Reciprocity and Meritocracy are as they are, without the wishful thinking and parasitism of women. We know the name of pandora: Abrahamism of the Jews, and its cancerous impact on the christians and muslims and by consequence, the rest of the world. How do we stop abrahamism, cosmopolitanism, and the ridicule, shaming, rallying, and gossip of women? Reciprocity, Truth. Testimonialism. Natural Law. Punishment. Zero Tolerance. The via positiva law of Reciprocity (natural law): The via negativa law is non imposition of costs The via positiva of words is truth, of actions is exchange, The via negativa is zero tolerance And that is the aristocratic (white) version of Sharia. Meaning that zero tolerance, requires mastery of violence. Mastery of violence is expensive. Therefore it must be profitable. Aristocracy’s first industry is violence for the purpose of conducting zero tolerance of impositions of costs, by words or deeds, directly or indirectly, The common people need only rule of law to protect them – when empowered they are parasites. all else can be produced by voluntary rather than coercive organizations. The people who demonstrate productivity through reciprocity of production need means of developing commons by which to create multipliers of their productivity. They require a market for the production of commons: houses of the commons. The people who demonstrate productivity through defense of reciprocity: militia and army, sheriff and judiciary, regional nobility and the monarchy, require a house of government to limit the houses of the commons. With courts of reciprocity under universal standing and universal application a market for reciprocity can form without the monopoly rule of government to fabricate it. Then government can be used for its only moral purpose: the creation of contracts for the production and maintenance of commons – where these contracts must survive the market for reciprocity we call the courts. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
I’ll give you the best answer I can, having spent some time on this question myself.
- Nation states and empires attempt to crush local identities, or deny them. (china and mongols the most obvious). Governments have incentives to be dishonest. All government data is suspect. Unfortunately the Academy is a co conspirator to government because it is cheaper to use government data than to conduct genetic and cultural research.
- During the time of nation states, most europeans lost their local identities, although our ‘tribes’ at last at the macro level are still ascertainable in many cases. Even today, despite the fact that northeastern, northern, central, and southern descendants in the united states all come from different regions and tribes, and still practice those cultural differences, the government suppresses those differences.
- So when we say ‘ethnicity’ are we saying nation state, or race, sub-race, tribe, and clan, using the identity with which they identify themselves? For example, the french speak french, but and parisians are culturally parisian, but the french countryside is identifiably germanic and has retained those cultural tendencies. American whites are primarily german, but speak english. Southern italians are ethnically greek, and northern ethnically german. They know this, but data just groups them together.
- For these politicized reasons, I tend to think the only honest means of judging ethnicity is genetic, cultural, and linguistic in that order, which is how people tend to describe themselves if they have an ethnic identity that is important to them. For those that it isn’t there is usually a reason to avoid it and choose some else less ‘truthful’.
- Using that method of categorization, As far as I know there are four major races(with austrailasians earning their own category), nine or so subraces (separating out the various indo europeans in particular), over 100 minor races and a vast number tribes and unmeasurable number of clans.
- But the truth is that genetics is going to solve this for us within the next few decades and governments will no longer be able to play their games with us.
https://www.quora.com/How-many-ethnic-groups-are-there-in-the-whole-world