WHY WERE WESTERNERS UNSUCCESSFUL AT EXPORTING ARYANISM (MARKETS) by Simon Ström By merely establishing rule, a small minority of conquerors do not have the resources to alter the basic fabric of social organization in a region that is already populous, wealthy and has a rigid socio-political system that works for them and is adapted to the local natural incentives. Like the Mongols in China or Iran, the conquerors are rather the ones who are subject to assimilation, although they might retain or even spread their language and symbolism as a function of its prestige. In order to permeate all society, the imposed, foreign evolutionary strategy must be carried by greater numbers than that, or at least powerful enough mechanisms of overcoming the inertia of “immunological rejection” of non-self cultural impulses. The lesser the primordial differences in genes, culture and natural incentives between conqueror and conquered, the lesser the need of great numbers in order to assimilate through elite dominance. 1. Small minority conquest: dynastic turnover, insignificant gene flow and socio-cultural regression to the median. Examples: Yuan dynasty, Hittites, Gothic Spain, British Raj. (Early Indo-Aryans were close to 1, but gravitated somewhat toward 2) 2. Sizable minority conquest: significant gene flow (amalgamation), socio-cultural regression to the mean. Examples: Corded Ware horizon, Roman Gaul, Latin America. 3. Great majority conquest: displacement, insignificant or no gene flow, complete socio-cultural continuation of the conquerors. Examples: North America, Kosovo, West Bank (future). So the obstacles of exporting our strategy are: – They don’t want it. They can profit from modernization without Westernization. – Military dominance won’t cut it. You need to dominate kinship and the social fabric. – The cost of export is too great because we are too different. Rule might be profitable, but assimilation? Questionable. We have evolved to pursue our strategy for millennia, others have not. – Simon Ström From Curt: The problem with spreading our social order is (a) demographic distribution and (b) degree of civilization. In practice we should see Aryanism (markets for rule) expandable only into areas that did not have the ability to expand the underclass, and did not possess a large underclass, and face little tribal conflict. Conversely we should see the worst behavior among peoples who have expansive underclasses, the agrarian or pastoral ability to expand those underclasses, and lots of territorial competition from other kin groups. And that is what we see
Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology
-
Noah J Revoy Ruthless selfishness is not an advantage to a group. In-group prefe
Noah J RevoyRuthless selfishness is not an advantage to a group. In-group preference however is. Whites are still by far the strongest race as judged by what we produce (inventions, culture, GDP), we are still histories best warriors and we can easily take over the whole world if we wanted to. The problem is that we have lost our will to power. Generation X is however a return to our roots. They are pissed off that the Baby Boomers squandered the sacrifices of our ancestors and they are willing to take back our birth right. Whites have hit bottom and we are now starting to turn it around.
-
Noah J Revoy Ruthless selfishness is not an advantage to a group. In-group prefe
Noah J RevoyRuthless selfishness is not an advantage to a group. In-group preference however is. Whites are still by far the strongest race as judged by what we produce (inventions, culture, GDP), we are still histories best warriors and we can easily take over the whole world if we wanted to. The problem is that we have lost our will to power. Generation X is however a return to our roots. They are pissed off that the Baby Boomers squandered the sacrifices of our ancestors and they are willing to take back our birth right. Whites have hit bottom and we are now starting to turn it around.
-
Noah J Revoy White people need to get married and have more children. Femini
Noah J Revoy
White people need to get married and have more children. Feminism, MGTOW, easy divorce, compulsory education (indoctrination) and population replacement (immigration) are leading to a demographic winter (genocide) for our people. No more white people means no more civil rights, no more technological progress, no more civilisation. Ok, so what are you doing about it? We have two options, 1) fight and 2) breed. We will need to do both to survive. Other people are starting to fight back, but very few are tackling the demographic winter. What can you do to ensure that we will have a next generation? – Get help. – Join up with others and form your tribe. – Get married. – Have more kids. – Encourage other white people to do the same. – Push back against nihilism of Feminism and MGTOW. – Join a community and share relationship wisdom. www.smv4k.com -
The Militia Separates The West From The Rest
by Ryan Williams The militia is the institution that is the causal source of the West’s success – that which separates us from the rest of the world.
To be a Propertarian is to prosecute lies To prosecute, you must have the means to coerce To coerce you must have weapons To use weapons you must have skill To have skill you must practice To practice you must have discipline Leave the momentary pleasures behind, and go sharpen your tools. We have work to do. “Teach him he must deny himself,” said Lee. That was the general’s advice to a young mother who brought her infant to him after the War Between the States to receive his blessing. -
The Militia Separates The West From The Rest
by Ryan Williams The militia is the institution that is the causal source of the West’s success – that which separates us from the rest of the world.
To be a Propertarian is to prosecute lies To prosecute, you must have the means to coerce To coerce you must have weapons To use weapons you must have skill To have skill you must practice To practice you must have discipline Leave the momentary pleasures behind, and go sharpen your tools. We have work to do. “Teach him he must deny himself,” said Lee. That was the general’s advice to a young mother who brought her infant to him after the War Between the States to receive his blessing. -
Islam and Byzantium: The Economic and Intellectual Dark Ages
There are very good reasons that Justinian and Constantine, from the safety of Byzantium, used Syrian and Judaic thought to attack the Greek and Roman Institutions of learning. They did it with malice, intent, and forethought, and while it is true that islam caused the ECONOMIC dark age, the SOCIAL AND INTELLECTUAL dark age is impossible to divorce from the rise and fall of Christianity. That’s just the evidence. I don’t see any ‘good’ in christianity that was not in roman and greek thought prior to christianity: Aryanism.
Lies: false promises of utopia in an afterlife, like false promises of economic and status equality, are cheap means of government and parasitism. Rule, using Rule of Law by Natural Law, under the promise of violence, in exchange for taxation (commissions) for the creation of increasingly profitable markets is about as truthful as one can get, for the simple reason that it contains no via-positiva promises, and leaves choice of pursuits to the ruled. -
Islam and Byzantium: The Economic and Intellectual Dark Ages
There are very good reasons that Justinian and Constantine, from the safety of Byzantium, used Syrian and Judaic thought to attack the Greek and Roman Institutions of learning. They did it with malice, intent, and forethought, and while it is true that islam caused the ECONOMIC dark age, the SOCIAL AND INTELLECTUAL dark age is impossible to divorce from the rise and fall of Christianity. That’s just the evidence. I don’t see any ‘good’ in christianity that was not in roman and greek thought prior to christianity: Aryanism.
Lies: false promises of utopia in an afterlife, like false promises of economic and status equality, are cheap means of government and parasitism. Rule, using Rule of Law by Natural Law, under the promise of violence, in exchange for taxation (commissions) for the creation of increasingly profitable markets is about as truthful as one can get, for the simple reason that it contains no via-positiva promises, and leaves choice of pursuits to the ruled. -
Aryanism: The West Consists of Nation States or Ceases to Exist
Anyone can build an empire with resources and technology to do so. You just can only live under the type of rule, institutions, and culture, necessary to maintain an empire. And that means european civilization retains many small nation states or it ceases to exist. Because you cannot have a high trust heterogeneous political order. It’s not possible. —“If your people are organically organized, clannish, tribal, egalitarian and have a thing for “purity” then they will also have high trust. You can expand, but you can’t build an empire or you’ll destroy it. Empires require bureaucracy and hierarchy as well as the extension of kinship to others. People that can’t (and didn’t!) do extended families can’t do empires. I guess It should be obvious.”— Markets for nations. Markets for regions. Markets for whatever we want – among our kin. We can build a civilization but we cannot build an empire.
An empire by definition crosses ethnic and cultural lines. a civilization by definition is defined but ethnic and cultural lines. America is an empire and cannot therefore persist as a european civilization under common law. -
On The Future of the Western Polytheistic Social Order
ON THE FUTURE OF THE WESTERN “POLYTHEISTIC” SOCIAL ORDER I am trying to find a way to talk about the fact that we have never had a conflationary system of thought (monotheism) in the west, and have always had separation of church (peasantry) and state (nobility) and burgher/freeman (commerce). And taht the church (religion), the burgher (philosophy), and the state (law) all competed with their own narratives. The problem is the BINDING narrative. If christianity fails as teh binding narrative, how do we replace that binding narrative, yet preserve christianity for the underclasses (the weak) who need it? Germanicized christianity, even latinized christianity, differs from byzantine christianity, differs from judaism, differs from islamism, differs from egyptian and prior eras’ shamanism. Germanized christianity always possessed ALL models of thought, from the aristocratic and martial law, to the philosophy, to the religion of the poor. But we used each in its place. And christianity did serve as the majority doctrine since the vast majority of people were poor and ignorant. When that is true, it’s easy for the martial/legal, and the philosophical/commercial to ‘go along’ with the civic bingding narrative and rituals. The question is, now that the majority are not poor and ignorant, what is the binding narrative under which we can still make use of science, law, philosophy and christianity? I mean. christianity is fucking ridiculous. Church isn’t. Myth, Festival, Ritual, Discipline aren’t. They’re necessary. The content of jesus’ philosophy is trivial. The magical shit is nonsense. nothing but jewish and syrian and byzantine lies. the natural law that the church inherited from the romans and the stoics, and the science that the modern era inherited from the greeks and the engineering from romans is all there for us to use. History is there for us to use. By any measure we have ‘discovered’ that we, and less so the chinese, are ‘right’ and that everyone else is not only wrong but catastrophically and degeneratively wrong. So, how do we modernize the church, retain jesus’s (valuable teaching) but achieve in the modern world what Acquinas achieved in the ancient? how do we modernize the teachings of jesus, and the ancient lessons of babylonians so that they are compatible with the ancient lessons of the european peoples in greek, roman, germanic form? How do I start with sovereignty, agency, natural law, markets in everything and the transcendence of man of our ancestors, and include jesus’ advice that if we increase the size of our kin, but our understanding that there is a limit of our kin to those who are in fact our genetic kin, that we will be buying options on future cooperation that together make us more competitively powerful than all alternatives? There is only one ‘story’ of such a thing. IT IS THE STORY OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION FROM THE YAMNA TO TODAY, and the lionization of all those who demonstrated their continuance of it, and the demonization of all those who impeded or harmed it. And the semites and iranians (byzantines) seem to have done been those who impeded it.