IT’S BECOMING OBVIOUS
Once Ethnic Europeans integrate with local gene pools they never recover. EVER. EVER. EVER.
It was possible to conquer and replace the less numerous neolithic peoples and develop markets.
But in those places where the peoples were too primitive, and possibly we might say, still not adapted to land holding, market development was not possible.
The underclasses were too great in number.
YOU CANNOT FIX A POLLUTED GENE POOL.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 14:33:00 UTC
CIVILIZATIONS MAKE EXCUSES AND LABEL THEM ‘GOOD’
OMFG. Here. I’ll say it differently. Here is half of history reduced for you in to a few paragraphs.
In the west the aristocracy used markets and law, and the promise of freedom to domesticate people. This created a lot of room for men to obtain dominance signals in family, military, property, commerce, and intellectual pursuits. They aggressively killed off their underclasses in large numbers.
In the middle east, they used slavery to domesticate people, and the promise of equality under ‘god’ are they were happy with that structure, since by retaining tribal boundaries they left a lot of room for males to obtain dominance signals within their micro-tribes. Because subsistence costs were low, the maintained their underclasses in large numbers.
In the far east they used bureaucracy and markets to domesticate people, without promise of freedom, but with promise of access to the bureaucracy. they aggressively killed off their underclasses in ast numbers.
It’s not complicated really.
We have been taught a history of BELIEF, rather than the history of JUSTIFICATIONS (excuses) people made to cast necessity as ‘good’.
I mean, here. I’ll make it IDIOT-SIMPLE: Basic problem: Human males of the four macro races, are all super-predators. Some of them smart and some of them stupid, and some of them a little less stupid. Every society is organized in a way that keeps the super-predators at least somewhat happy, since it takes only a VERY FUCKING SMALL NUMBER OF THEM to return to their natural super-predator occupation, and destroy everything in sight.
THAT IS THE PROBLEM CIVILIZATIONS FACE: how do you make enough super-predator males reasonably happy that they prefer to be cage-fed, rather than chase down prey? That’s it.
After that, it’s all luxury goods.
Now, the best way to do that? Cull the stupid ones until there are only less stupid and smart one’s left, who prefer to conduct their predation in markets, which produces a whole lot of productivity that drags mankind out of ignorance and poverty.
Now, do I have to bitch-slap the entire fucking world to make this kindergarden level bit of scientific evidence get through your fucking thick skulls????? Huh?
Enough of this nice ‘common good’ stuff. WE ARE SUPER PREDATORS and personally, I’d rather prey than labor. So if you wanna NOT have me and mine and those like me, prey upon you we agree to do so as long as we all work in markets.
But the last thing a super predator is going to do is let some parasite prey on him without doing something about it.
And we’re getting REALLY READY to DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
Curt Doolittle
(too many invectives to attach this post to the institute)
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 12:36:00 UTC
How many ethnic groups are there in the whole world? https://www.quora.com/How-many-ethnic-groups-are-there-in-the-whole-world/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=25028bf8
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 01:54:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/867921914223894528
HOW MANY ETHINC GROUPS ARE THERE IN THE WORLD?
I’ll give you the best answer I can, having spent some time on this question myself.
Nation states and empires attempt to crush local identities, or deny them. (china and mongols the most obvious). Governments have incentives to be dishonest. All government data is suspect. Unfortunately the Academy is a co conspirator to government because it is cheaper to use government data than to conduct genetic and cultural research.
During the time of nation states, most europeans lost their local identities, although our ‘tribes’ at last at the macro level are still ascertainable in many cases. Even today, despite the fact that northeastern, northern, central, and southern descendants in the united states all come from different regions and tribes, and still practice those cultural differences, the government suppresses those differences.
So when we say ‘ethnicity’ are we saying nation state, or race, sub-race, tribe, and clan, using the identity with which they identify themselves? For example, the french speak french, but and parisians are culturally parisian, but the french countryside is identifiably germanic and has retained those cultural tendencies. American whites are primarily german, but speak english. Southern italians are ethnically greek, and northern ethnically german. They know this, but data just groups them together.
For these politicized reasons, I tend to think the only honest means of judging ethnicity is genetic, cultural, and linguistic in that order, which is how people tend to describe themselves if they have an ethnic identity that is important to them. For those that it isn’t there is usually a reason to avoid it and choose some else less ‘truthful’.
Using that method of categorization, As far as I know there are four major races(with austrailasians earning their own category), nine or so subraces (separating out the various indo europeans in particular), over 100 minor races and a vast number tribes and unmeasurable number of clans.
But the truth is that genetics is going to solve this for us within the next few decades and governments will no longer be able to play their games with us.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-25 21:55:00 UTC
https://t.co/sR6zHCXJ2aHow many ethnic groups are there in the whole world?
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-25 21:54:00 UTC
I have far more in common with greeks and romans and germanic pagans, than medieval christians, and I have a very hard time imagining that anyone of learning saying otherwise.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-25 17:23:00 UTC
OUR BIBLE IS VAST, BUT OUR LAW SIMPLE.
Homer’s Illiad and Oddyssey and the greek myths and germanic fables. That’s our Literature. History. Thats our literature. Law that’s our literature. Science. That’s our literature.
That’s our literature.
The rest is just superstition and deceit.
Hence why I try to write law, not philosophy.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-25 16:27:00 UTC
THE ONLY CYCLE OF HISTORY THAT MATTERS
It’s pretty simple. Abrahamism is an underclass rebellion against the aristocracies of the ancient world, all of whom are western (brown haired) white, or eastern (black haired) white.
Just as the lies of the enlightenment philosophers (anglo, french, german, jewish, russian) are a middle class rebellion against the aristocracies of post ancient world.
Just as the lies of the cosmopolitan jews, and french postmodernists are a working class rebellion against the enlightenment aristocracy.
The cycle of history: Truth produces eugenic aristocracy, and lies produce dysgenic pretense of equality.
We empower the animals and they defeat us in times of weakness.
We recover and domesticate the animals.
We empower the animals and they defeat us in times of weakness.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-25 16:07:00 UTC
HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ARAB EMPIRE’S CONQUESTS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMJRsd8SrhU#t=34.313982
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-25 15:26:00 UTC
TURNING JEWISH PHILOSOPHY ON ITS HEAD, AND THEREBY UNDERSTANDING OUR OWN ARISTOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY It’s not hard. You can turn all jewish philosophy on its head: A poor, migratory, pastoral people, with high inbreeding, high clannishness, reverse sexual dimorphism, and who experienced their age of transformation as slaves, never adapted to land-holding, or developed land holding virtues, norms, institutions, laws and traditions, nor through selection developed a masculine aristocracy, or permanent warrior class, then industrialized the lying and wishful thinking of slaves, and upon obtaining literacy, selected for amplifying all their reverse sexual dimorphism (female reproductive strategy), and supporting values, and through their males, weaponized the reproductive strategy of women: wishful thinking, gossip, and deceit, by which to bring about a restored primitive matrilineal order. In other words, just as women evolved gossip to rally males against alphas, jews continued this strategy of gossiping Just as women make their men weak if give the opportunity, jews make their hosts weak if given the opportunity. Just as women ridicule, shame, gossip, and rally, jews do so but on an industrial scale with great deal of sophistication. Just as women are superior at speech and men at action, jews are superior at speech, and aristocracy superior in action. Just as women are petty and treat each other horribly if empowered, jews are petty and treat others horribly if empowered. We have already had one jewish empire: the soviet union. And we must never have that happen to mankind again. So no more Abrahamism: judaism, christianity, islam. So no more Cosmopolitanism: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard, Rand, of the millions of jewish propagandists. No more postmodernism: Foucault, Derrida, and all. No more feminism and its history of lies. Reciprocity and Meritocracy are as they are, without the wishful thinking and parasitism of women. We know the name of pandora: Abrahamism of the Jews, and its cancerous impact on the christians and muslims and by consequence, the rest of the world. How do we stop abrahamism, cosmopolitanism, and the ridicule, shaming, rallying, and gossip of women? Reciprocity, Truth. Testimonialism. Natural Law. Punishment. Zero Tolerance. The via positiva law of Reciprocity (natural law): The via negativa law is non imposition of costs The via positiva of words is truth, of actions is exchange, The via negativa is zero tolerance And that is the aristocratic (white) version of Sharia. Meaning that zero tolerance, requires mastery of violence. Mastery of violence is expensive. Therefore it must be profitable. Aristocracy’s first industry is violence for the purpose of conducting zero tolerance of impositions of costs, by words or deeds, directly or indirectly, The common people need only rule of law to protect them – when empowered they are parasites. all else can be produced by voluntary rather than coercive organizations. The people who demonstrate productivity through reciprocity of production need means of developing commons by which to create multipliers of their productivity. They require a market for the production of commons: houses of the commons. The people who demonstrate productivity through defense of reciprocity: militia and army, sheriff and judiciary, regional nobility and the monarchy, require a house of government to limit the houses of the commons. With courts of reciprocity under universal standing and universal application a market for reciprocity can form without the monopoly rule of government to fabricate it. Then government can be used for its only moral purpose: the creation of contracts for the production and maintenance of commons – where these contracts must survive the market for reciprocity we call the courts. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine