Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • I cannot advocate a restoration of Stoicism since this would lead to unscientifi

    I cannot advocate a restoration of Stoicism since this would lead to unscientific and feminine interpretations of very limited ancient texts.

    I can however, advocate it’s restatement in entirely ratio-scientific terms.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 10:31:00 UTC

  • (read this) The Ancient Civilization of Greece and Rome culminated under Roman P

    (read this)

    The Ancient Civilization of Greece and Rome culminated under Roman Paganism, Roman Stoicism, and Roman Law.

    Christendom consists of Steppe Orthodoxy, Mediterranean Catholicism, North Sea Protestantism, Anglo/German Puritanism, French/Ango Postmodernism. With the masculine at the start of the spectrum, and feminism at the end of it.

    All of christendom has restored some aspect of aristotelianism (science) and stoicism (virtues). But most have preserved some Semitic deceptions, out of habit, indoctrination, familiarity, or ignorance of alternatives.

    All of christendom has preserved some aspects of our paganism – particulary in celtic, germanic, slavic, lands – if only in our mythos of pedagogy, hearth, and home. Masculinity survives. It survives most strongly in america which has preserved the militia the longest, and succeeded in defeating the state, rather than defeating the church. This is a lesson for mankind for all eternity. America preserved her churches and her militia longest, by defeating the state, not empowering it or taking it over. Just as anglo saxon man and Classical man would not tolerate the state’s imposition on the militia.

    But once we depart the masculine entirely we find the Jewish philosophy.

    The Jewish Counter-Enligthenment arrived in the form of Jewish cosmopolitanism in the works of Boaz’s restatement of jewish (feminine) history, Marx’s restatement of jewish (feminine) ethics, sociology, and history, freud’s restatement of jewish (feminine) ethics, and Mises restatement of jewish (feminine) economics, as well as the Frankfurt School’s restatement of jewish (feminine) aesthetics.

    If we want to discover social science and the articulation of western civilization’s strategy of truthfulness: it’s Aristotle and Zeno culminating in the Roman Stoics, Defeated by the Eastern Empire under Constantine through Justinian.

    The truth (stoicism) was Restored by Galileo, Copernicus, Kepler, DaVinci,Newton, AND Machiavelli Bacon, Locke, Hume, Smith.

    THEN the near defeat by the Abrahamic Counter-Enlightenment IN COMPETITION WITH the second scientific and industrial revolution (social sciences) by Maxwell, Poincare, Darwin, Spencer, Hayek, and Nietzsche.

    DEFEATED again by the combination of the Jewish (feminine) Abrahamic Counter-Enlightenment, and the French (feminine) counter enlightenment: Postmodernism.

    Meanwhile the German (protestant) Counter-Enlightenment (pious, or submissive, masculine) had little consequence, because of Kant and subsequent continental philosophers continuing the conflation of experience, existence, and goodness, instead of truth.

    At present, very, very, very, reluctant Jewish social scientists, cautious anglo american cognitive scientists, evangelic british historians and archaeologists, romantic russian archaeologists, a very select group of pragmatic other european scientists, and now (thankfully) competitive chinese scientists, have, at least since the 1980s used science (once again) to defeat the lies of the Abrahamists, whether jewish, french, feminist, or feminist-apologists using feminine strategy of gossip (betas, journalists, writers, artists, teachers, and professors).

    The primary challenge we face today is immigration. Because it is fairly certain the the scientific problem will be answered, and the entire feminine argumentative artifice be overthrown, within the next thirty years.

    So our primary challenge is to repatriate vast legions, or lock them in ghettos again, or overthrow our governments and kill as many as we can until they leave, so that the science can confirm what men know by intuition.

    You cannot fix stupid. You cannot clean genes. And the prosperity of a people is not a matter of opinion and choice but one of incentives produced by a militia of sovereign men in the service of a common enemy, where the common enemy is the universe, and the half humans that surround us, and prevent our conquest of both.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 10:29:00 UTC

  • As a general rule of mutual misunderstanding, a russian cannot conceive of a pro

    As a general rule of mutual misunderstanding, a russian cannot conceive of a protestant mind’s trust, and it is very difficult for a protestant to conceive of a russian minds total absence of it.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 10:16:00 UTC

  • THE VIA-POSITIVA OF TRANSCENDENCE Athens/Sparta against Hittites/Persia, Greece/

    THE VIA-POSITIVA OF TRANSCENDENCE

    Athens/Sparta against Hittites/Persia, Greece/Rome against Persia/Egypt/Levant/Celtica, Britain/Germany against the world.

    Heroism needs an enemy.

    Once you win against the enemy the army and navy turn on each other to preserve their reason for existence.

    The enemy is the dark forces of ignorance, time, regression to the mean, and the hostility of the universe to our existence.

    A set of problems that can only be transcended, by hour human transcendence.

    And a transcendence that can only be achieved by western civilization.

    Why? Because only the west defeats others by the production of commons the most important of which is Truth.

    Heroic Truth is enough, because the war against the universe is enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 09:45:00 UTC

  • SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT Geographical circumstances and ‘timing’ led to the choic

    SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT

    Geographical circumstances and ‘timing’ led to the choice of very counter-to-type cultural norms, which produced as a consequence institutional, cultural, and technological superiority which resulted (as in east asia) in more rapid selection for neoteny and more rapid culling of the underclasses (the “Evil 80s”).

    It will be very, very, hard to defeat this argument btw.

    It is possible that europeans had developed genetic tendencies prior to the adoption of horse (steppe), wheel(europe), and bronze(armenian anatolia).

    However, as far as I can tell, it is unnecessary to rely on genetic accident, given that all of western civilizations advantages are explained without reliance on such accident. And there is no evidence that any other people could not adopt those same cultural, institutional, and genetic abilities by similar reduction of the underclasses alone.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 10:37:00 UTC

  • CULTURAL DIFFERENCES IN ADAPTATION (worth repeating)

    CULTURAL DIFFERENCES IN ADAPTATION

    (worth repeating)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 08:39:00 UTC

  • FAMILY TYPE CHARACTERISTICS

    FAMILY TYPE CHARACTERISTICS


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 08:37:00 UTC

  • TODD’S FAMILY TYPES AND ASSOCIATED IDEOLOGIES

    TODD’S FAMILY TYPES AND ASSOCIATED IDEOLOGIES


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 08:33:00 UTC

  • THE ENLIGHTENMENT STRATEGIES (worth repeating)

    THE ENLIGHTENMENT STRATEGIES

    (worth repeating)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 08:30:00 UTC

  • Are There Any Good Arguments For White Supremacy Without Being Racist?

    If somehow acknowledging racial differences is ‘racism’ then no because you can’t even ask the question, and so you cant answer it either

    If ‘racism’ refers to treating an individual by the average properties of his race then that is a legitimate criticism of an illogical behavior.

    If ‘racism’ refers to criticism of the reproductive, cultural, political strategies of a competing group, rather than criticism of one’s inability to defend against the harm caused you by that group, then that’s illogical also.

    If ‘racism’ refers to a preference for nationalism or separatism in order to reduce conflicts between groups and improve the conditions of either by creating norms and institutions more suitable for each group’s differing wants and needs, then criticizing that is not rational.

    White ‘supremacy’ in nearly every field is simply a fact – although the reason for white success (the high cost of truth even if it may disrupt the dominance hierarchy, and therefore resulting in reason, debate, argument, common law, science, medicine, engineering, technology etc.

    White genetic supremacy does not appear correct. all racial groups both evolved in different geographical conditions and in doing so produced different levels of neoteny. With asians most, whites next, mixed colors next, and blacks last. The reason being that whites and asians have been in homogenous groups a long time, under agrarianism and have succeeded at selecting for neoteny. And secondly, because of the pressures of agrarianism and the winter seasons, the asians and western europeans have more successfully reduced the sizes of the ‘troublesome’ (underclass) population leaving almost the entire population descendent from the genetic middle class. Every other race and subrace has dominated warmer climates where the rate of maturity as a means of surviving a higher disease gradient requires earlier maturity and deeper maturity and therefore limited selection for neoteny.

    The superiority of europeans appears to be the result of a rather small set of noble families never exceeding a few hundred thousand in total population combined with a middle class majority population who expanded downward.

    So because europeans and asians lived in homogenous groups that were somewhat insulated from sun belt density of diverse and nomadic pastoral peoples, they were able to genetically select (not so much evolve) for superior populations. The differences between china and europe are largely that china started earlier. THe muslims were not able to cause a thousand year dark age in china like they were in Europe by collapsing the four major ancient civilizations and reducing them to sub 85IQ averages. But the west is faster than china in both teh ancient and modern worlds because of its institutions of ‘truthfulness’ instead of ‘face-saving’, which allowed the west to advance more quickly in both ancient and modern eras.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-there-any-good-arguments-for-white-supremacy-without-being-racist