Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • Are There Any Good Arguments For White Supremacy Without Being Racist?

    If somehow acknowledging racial differences is ‘racism’ then no because you can’t even ask the question, and so you cant answer it either

    If ‘racism’ refers to treating an individual by the average properties of his race then that is a legitimate criticism of an illogical behavior.

    If ‘racism’ refers to criticism of the reproductive, cultural, political strategies of a competing group, rather than criticism of one’s inability to defend against the harm caused you by that group, then that’s illogical also.

    If ‘racism’ refers to a preference for nationalism or separatism in order to reduce conflicts between groups and improve the conditions of either by creating norms and institutions more suitable for each group’s differing wants and needs, then criticizing that is not rational.

    White ‘supremacy’ in nearly every field is simply a fact – although the reason for white success (the high cost of truth even if it may disrupt the dominance hierarchy, and therefore resulting in reason, debate, argument, common law, science, medicine, engineering, technology etc.

    White genetic supremacy does not appear correct. all racial groups both evolved in different geographical conditions and in doing so produced different levels of neoteny. With asians most, whites next, mixed colors next, and blacks last. The reason being that whites and asians have been in homogenous groups a long time, under agrarianism and have succeeded at selecting for neoteny. And secondly, because of the pressures of agrarianism and the winter seasons, the asians and western europeans have more successfully reduced the sizes of the ‘troublesome’ (underclass) population leaving almost the entire population descendent from the genetic middle class. Every other race and subrace has dominated warmer climates where the rate of maturity as a means of surviving a higher disease gradient requires earlier maturity and deeper maturity and therefore limited selection for neoteny.

    The superiority of europeans appears to be the result of a rather small set of noble families never exceeding a few hundred thousand in total population combined with a middle class majority population who expanded downward.

    So because europeans and asians lived in homogenous groups that were somewhat insulated from sun belt density of diverse and nomadic pastoral peoples, they were able to genetically select (not so much evolve) for superior populations. The differences between china and europe are largely that china started earlier. THe muslims were not able to cause a thousand year dark age in china like they were in Europe by collapsing the four major ancient civilizations and reducing them to sub 85IQ averages. But the west is faster than china in both teh ancient and modern worlds because of its institutions of ‘truthfulness’ instead of ‘face-saving’, which allowed the west to advance more quickly in both ancient and modern eras.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-there-any-good-arguments-for-white-supremacy-without-being-racist

  • THE CIVILIZATIONAL “SH-T TEST” Someone said this to me yesterday I think, and it

    THE CIVILIZATIONAL “SH-T TEST”

    Someone said this to me yesterday I think, and it’s stuck with me. That this is the best explanation for our current condition. Our women are giving us a “Sh-t Test” on a civilizational scale.

    And we are failing.

    Thankfully you can fix it with explanation, threat, and the back of your hand.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 09:57:00 UTC

  • WHAT DID MARX GET RIGHT? (NOTHING) He articulated class as a conflict rather tha

    WHAT DID MARX GET RIGHT? (NOTHING)

    He articulated class as a conflict rather than as genetic differences in ability that the aristocracies since the dawn of western civilization had correctly observed. Hence human animal > slave > serf > freeman > burgher > church(nobility) > aristocracy (peerage).

    It’s not that his observation was new, its that his observation was wrong. The east and the west succeeded in no small party by the continuous reduction of the size of the underclass by upward redistribution of reproduction.

    Today we know that each person in the underclass is six times as costly as any individual in the middle class can produce in surplus of his consumption.

    There is a reason Marx is taught as fantasy literature of historical curiosity only: he was wrong about almost everything.

    The problem is quite different: the middle class seizure of the state under capitalism under the rubric of equality and democracy is incompatible with the evidence: at every standard deviation in ability, humans are demonstrably superior in every way. So much so that at two standard deviations, the ability to communicate on other than trivialities disappears.

    Marx created a fantasy, as did Boaz and Freud. Why? the same reason that Maxwell, Menger, Darwin, Spencer, Nietzsche, were right: the middle class seizure of power DID upset the natural order. The natural order being a hierarchy of the classes with the aristocracy organizing the suppression of parasitism driving everyone into the market to survive; the middle class experimenting, inventing, financing, entrepreneurship, planning, organizing, and collecting the resources of which labor is merely one input.

    What marx got mostly wrong, is that all the value is created by the middle and upper class, and the working class is the chief beneficiary of organizing them to produce consumer goods that they can now afford to purchase because they lack the ability to perform the middle class and upper class functions otherwise.

    That’s the science of it.

    The people who benefit from consumer capitalism are the working class. My ancestors were far happier with their higher status in previous generations than the relative equality with the lower classes under consumer capitalism. And imagine how the aristocracy feels.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 19:47:00 UTC

  • @mayoroflondon London is occupied by the 3rd world in the 2nd Conquest of the an

    @mayoroflondon London is occupied by the 3rd world in the 2nd Conquest of the ancient civilization of the Isles. First romans, now Islam.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 14:00:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872815593283612672

  • @mayoroflondon The safest cities in the world are homogenous european and christ

    @mayoroflondon The safest cities in the world are homogenous european and christian. PERIOD. The Levantine Lie cannot spread to europe.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 13:57:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872814864053530624

  • EMPIRES ARE A BAD IDEA. KIN NOT CORPORATION. Empires MUST eventually rely on dip

    EMPIRES ARE A BAD IDEA. KIN NOT CORPORATION.

    Empires MUST eventually rely on diplomacy rather than force. diplomacy must eventually rely on deception rather than truth.

    The only people with whom we share common interest as scale are our kin.

    NATIONS NOT EMPIRES.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 09:24:00 UTC

  • China like America, is not a country but an empire. Europe is not a country but

    China like America, is not a country but an empire. Europe is not a country but a civilization. China succeeded in combining a civilization, empire, and country, due to successful conquest and administration.

    Imagine if europe had built a wall at least across the straights of gibraltar, the bosporus, the caucuses, and the Urals?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 08:11:00 UTC

  • WHY CHINA IS RIGHT. (important)(revise your values) China will dominate the futu

    WHY CHINA IS RIGHT.

    (important)(revise your values)

    China will dominate the future for the simple reasons that they have succeeded at juvenilization, succeeded at culling the lower classes, have succeeded at building an intolerant, militial ‘national’ (kinship) army, have succeeded at both building a wall AND not venturing outside of it, and succeeded at prohibiting incursion by any variation of Abrahamism, and succeeded at adopting aristotelianism, and consumer capitalism – all of that despite being UNABLE to adopt western truth, high trust, and rule of law, because it is contrary to the confucian teaching that one must preserve harmony rather than disrupt the dominance hierarchy through truthful speech.

    Conversely the west COULD dominate the future by replicating the chinese strategy of:

    (a) preserving our juvenilization,

    (b) preserving (and expanding) our culling of the underclasses

    (c) restoring our militial (kinship) National army.

    (d) building a wall between the european and non european peoples.

    (e) withdrawing from adventurism outside the wall.

    (f) suppressing, and eliminating all versions of abrahamism, and all forms of supernaturalism.

    (g) preserving our truth, high trust, and rule of law.

    In Addition

    (g) protecting our intellectual property from distribution.

    Otherwise we will, for purely genetic reasons, experience another dark age, and there exist no remaining isolated white peoples to rescue us from it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 07:57:00 UTC

  • I can say that we consider ourselves (rightfully) as possessing a superior civil

    I can say that we consider ourselves (rightfully) as possessing a superior civilization that has dragged mankind out of ignorance, poverty, superstition, tyranny, and disease in both the ancient and modern worlds. And I can say we finally know why that is true.

    I can say that some of us consider white people more attractive than people with less success at Juvenilization through reproductive selection.

    I can say that aside from attractiveness, it is hard to say one is superior to the Han/Korean/Japanese – although what they have gained in health and memory we have gained in language and creativity. And this tradeoff is worth studying.

    I can say that whites were disproportionately responsible for civilizations, and that non-whites have disproportionately been responsible for the Dark Ages – in particular, Abrahamism, whether Jewish/Marxist/Socialist/Libertarian, Christian/Postmodern, or Islamic/Islamist appears to be the worst thing that has every happened to mankind – it’s been more deadly than the plague.

    As the center of history, I think that the center of history is the war between white/chinese ‘aristocracy’ and everyone else’s underclass. And that an analysis of history is reducible to the see saw of that conflict.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 20:23:00 UTC

  • ANSWERS, I’LL TRY TO IMPROVE THEM WITH THE SCIENCE OF IT 1. Greater success at r

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-most-white-people-richer-than-non-whites/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=856c23a6&srid=u4QvTERRIBLE ANSWERS, I’LL TRY TO IMPROVE THEM WITH THE SCIENCE OF IT

    1. Greater success at reproductive juvenilization. we are not sure why other than that slowing the rate of maturity is possible in colder climates, whereas accelerating the rate of maturity in warmer clients is necessary for no other reason than to survive the higher incidence of disease, parasites, and predators.

    2. Greater success at aggressive culling the size of the underclasses. While it is impolitic to say so, the wealth or poverty of a people is more dependent upon the reduction and elimination of the underclasses than it is upon the production of exceptional people and education. A good rule of thumb is that every person at the bottom is six times as costly as every person at the top is productive.

    3. Greater success at eliminating the clannishness impulse. Again, we are not sure if this is an artifact of low population density and cold climates, or purely one of cultural forces influence reproductive choice. In either event, white people (to their detriment) are less tribal and clannish.

    4. For reasons we are just beginning to understand, the west made very different cultural choices. (a) telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth as highest virtue, despite any impact it would ahve on the dominance hierarchy. (b) Sovereignty and Markets in Everything creating a market for polities, and polities led by markets, rather than monopolistic hierarchies. As a consequence a division of the state into different institutions that competed with one another. This led to deflationary literature where the rest of the world relied on conflationary literature. (c) that the gods, like men, are subject to the laws of the natural universe, and that man can defeat the folly of these gods with cunning and effort.

    5. So white people are more trusting, more trustworthy, and have institutions that depend upon more trusting, more trustworthy people, and together these reduce the frictions that constrain non white peoples to lesser conditions. The only people close to whites are the Japanese and south koreans. And even among whites, these rules apply only to whites from above the Hajnal Line (protestants and their descendants) who practiced Bipartite Manorialism.

    6. TRUST=COOPERATIVE VELOCITY=RATE OF ECONOMY

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 20:14:00 UTC