Akhenaten was trying to do the same thing I am, 3350 years ago. End the rent seeking parasites.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 17:48:00 UTC
Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology
-
SO WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT THE OTTOMAN ECONOMY? How was land allocated, farmed, t
SO WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT THE OTTOMAN ECONOMY?
How was land allocated, farmed, taxed etc? How did that differ from christian lands?
Hmmmm????…..
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 17:08:00 UTC
-
WTH IS WRONG WITH THE SOUTHERN SLAVS? (please don’t get pissed. I want to know t
WTH IS WRONG WITH THE SOUTHERN SLAVS?
(please don’t get pissed. I want to know the cause. )
I mean, look. Slovenians (clearly slavic) 96. Ukrainians pick on slovenians for being a bit ‘slow’. But favorably. (They talk about Moldovans the way americans talk about Mexicans. )
BUT….WTH:…
Albania 90
Bosnia/Herz. 90
Croatia 90
Serbia 89
I mean. These are nearly indigenous-people IQ’s.
(they speak slavonic languages, but they aren’t ethnic slavs?)
I have only spent a little time in Croatia, in Dubrovnik, and I’d live there in a heartbeat if I could get 100mb internet. But wth? Is this native genomes, or is this muslim occupation? What?
( Alexander Zavialov ??? )
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 16:44:00 UTC
-
I proposed, in one of my videos, the circumpolar civilization. And that video is
I proposed, in one of my videos, the circumpolar civilization. And that video is worth viewing if you want to understand my point of view.
But the reality is quite simple. The west, the western slavs, the russians, the indians, the Han (chinese), Koreans, and The Japanese, have no problems with each other. We have no problem with africa. The world has a problem with islam. The world is starting to have a problem with south america – although we have hope.
But if the west would stop defending islam, and continue to ‘civilize’ india, the world would have no problems other than competing for trade.
The entire cause of this world’s suffering is islamic ‘civilization’ if you want to call it that.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 16:28:00 UTC
-
THE COMING DARK AGE? OR THE COMING WALLS? Even if we only start from the first A
THE COMING DARK AGE? OR THE COMING WALLS?
Even if we only start from the first Aryans, our civilization is 6,000 years old.
But in that time period we have had two dark ages:
1)the bronze age collapse from the barbarian migrations 1100/1200bc. All civilizations collapsed. Reading was lost. It lasted about 600 years.
2) the iron age collapse from the barbarian migrations 300/400ad – 1400/1500ad. It lasted approximately one thousand years.
Why are we so special that we would not have:
3) the steel age collapse from the barbarian migrations 1900/2000 – 3000ad? WIll it last a thousand years, or will it last even longer this time?
THE CHINESE
The chinese built a wall to keep out the barbarians.
The Romans failed to build a wall to keep out the barbarians.
The Germans and Russians failed to build a wall to keep out the barbarians.
WE HAVE A CHOICE.
We can build a wall and adopt the chinese strategy, or we can be overcome again – this time without the reserves of our ancient peoples of the north to arise again.
FORTRESS EUROPA.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 10:49:00 UTC
-
Why do we need continuous therapy in every civilization?
Why do we need continuous therapy in every civilization?
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 07:32:00 UTC
-
Waaay too much sh-t talking in the west. We need more Russians
Waaay too much sh-t talking in the west. We need more Russians.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 19:30:00 UTC
-
That’s the reason you know. The thing that makes germans the best civilization a
That’s the reason you know. The thing that makes germans the best civilization also makes them the most gullible.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 17:48:00 UTC
-
The difference between Chinese and European myths, both of which are deflationar
The difference between Chinese and European myths, both of which are deflationary, is the same as with our languages: Sinic High-Context Low-Precision, and European Low-Context High-Precision.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 09:22:00 UTC
-
THE MEANING OF “ARISTOCRACY” by Daniel Gurpide The term ‘aristocracy’ derives fr
THE MEANING OF “ARISTOCRACY”
by Daniel Gurpide
The term ‘aristocracy’ derives from what the ancient Greeks called ‘areté’, the quest for excellence: the act of living up to one’s full potential.
This tragic urge to self-overcoming (transcendence) may be identified as the only way man and his presence in the world may be ennobled.
The original Indo-European speakers defined themselves as ‘Aryans’. At the geographical extremes of the great migration, we find Arya in Sanskrit and Indo-Iranian, and Aire in the language of the Irish Celts—out of which probably arose Eire: ‘Irish.’ The root *ar- signifies ‘noble.’
Since any ‘aristocracy’, if it wants to survive nowadays, should recover and transfigure the founding myths of Indo-European culture, when it comes to specifying its particular virtues, such features as the following might be listed: an eminently aristocratic conception of the human individual; the importance of honour (‘shame’ rather than ‘sin’); a heroic attitude towards life’s challenges; the exaltation and sacralisation of the world, beauty, the body, strength, and health; the rejection of any ‘worlds beyond’; and the inseparability of morality and aesthetics.
The highest value for an aristocrat would lie not in a form of ‘justice’ whose purpose is essentially interpreted as flattening the social order in the name of equality, but in all that may allow man to surpass himself. Since to consider the implications of life’s basic framework as unjust would be palpably absurd, such classic antitheses as noble vs. base, courageous vs. cowardly, honourable vs. dishonourable, beautiful vs. deformed, sick vs. healthy . . . come to replace the antitheses based on the concept of sin: good vs. evil, humble vs. vainglorious, submissive vs. proud, weak vs. arrogant, modest vs. boastful .
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 09:10:00 UTC