Theme: Truth

  • You can’t testify to these things and as such can only lie

    You can’t testify to these things and as such can only lie.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-15 14:40:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018505655538331648

    Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018504696229777408


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018504696229777408

  • One does not prove a truth. One tests if one can falsify it. To say otherwise is

    One does not prove a truth. One tests if one can falsify it. To say otherwise is to lie. There are findings of the natural world obtained by proofs, instead by evidence and falsification of ignorance, error, bias, and deciet.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-15 14:40:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018505523505836035

    Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018504696229777408


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018504696229777408

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE EXISTENCE OF GODS. No. You don’t get it.

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE EXISTENCE OF GODS.

    No. You don’t get it. Gods exist the way Socrates (Historically), Siegfried(Mythically), and Gandalf(Fictionally) exist. Given that enough people study the wisdom of that mythos that emotional and intellectual norms develop from the ‘ritualization’, those gods exist in effect on our behavior if not in cause. These gods function as a standard of measurement at our most intuitionistic and most universal scale. Sympathy with shared experience and Synchronicity due to universal subjectivity to the same temporal streams of information, achieves what we consider supernatural, but is simply the consequence the culmination of patterns of behavior in concert with momentary information. I talk to gods every day. For the technique to work, whether with the god, a therapist, a friend, or yourself, you must be unable to lie in the role-play (prayer). If you can manage emotional and intellectual honesty with any god (collectively shared pattern of values), then you can obtain the benefit of the character’s frame of reference. The reason being that it is extremely hard for us to be intellectually honest with ourselves, and the act of speaking whether external or internal, forces continuous recursive disambiguation, which forces our brains to test our thoughts, just as we test our thoughts while we are speaking to others and anticipating their responses. By and large this system works extraordinarily well. If you combine that with self authoring and the virtues and select characters from history to represent those virtues and goals, and if you read enough about those people, you will in fact, obtain their wisdom through role playing discourse (prayer) – assuming you can practice intellectual honesty. Now, some of us lack the agency for this and this is why we have doctrine. But admission that you require doctrine is admission that you lack the agency to call yourself fully human. This is acceptable as long as you do not claim to possess the agency necessary to influence the decisions of others. And as such those of us who have agency must police those that do not, such that those who do not possess agency do not attempt to spread their lack of it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 17:13:09 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post. REJECTING BRETT WEINSTEIN’S METAPHORICAL TRUTH (Sa

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    REJECTING BRETT WEINSTEIN’S METAPHORICAL TRUTH

    (Same as rejecting Jordan Peterson’s Darwinian Truth)
    (Same as rejective Mathematical Idealism)
    (Same as rejecting all fictionalisms – ‘Conveniences’)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 15:25:42 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE APHORISM AND RIDDLE: SELF EQUILIBRATING K

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE APHORISM AND RIDDLE: SELF EQUILIBRATING KNOWLEDGE

    An aphorism is the penultimate device for the parsimonious conveyance of knowledge. The Chinese lack the concepts and vocabulary to produce aphorisms(science) so they produce ‘riddles'(wisdom). But only the far west and the far east have produced the technique of testable statements that produce competition rather than monopoly. The despotic people have developed monopoly, analogy, monotheism and obedience rather than competition and knowledge.

    I gotta tell you that despite knowing this for decades the time it has taken me to come anywhere close Nietzsche is horrifying. His talent is awe inspiring. But once you understand that this is how ‘it is best done’, at least you know what to strive for.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:44:29 UTC

  • Another painful truth. 😉

    Another painful truth. 😉 https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1017653696157581312

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link. Another painful truth. 😉

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    Another painful truth. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:14:59 UTC

  • REJECTING BRETT WEINSTEIN’S METAPHORICAL TRUTH (Same as rejecting Jordan Peterso

    REJECTING BRETT WEINSTEIN’S METAPHORICAL TRUTH

    (Same as rejecting Jordan Peterson’s Darwinian Truth)

    (Same as rejective Mathematical Idealism)

    (Same as rejecting all fictionalisms – ‘Conveniences’)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 11:25:00 UTC

  • THE APHORISM AND RIDDLE: SELF EQUILIBRATING KNOWLEDGE An aphorism is the penulti

    THE APHORISM AND RIDDLE: SELF EQUILIBRATING KNOWLEDGE

    An aphorism is the penultimate device for the parsimonious conveyance of knowledge. The Chinese lack the concepts and vocabulary to produce aphorisms(science) so they produce ‘riddles'(wisdom). But only the far west and the far east have produced the technique of testable statements that produce competition rather than monopoly. The despotic people have developed monopoly, analogy, monotheism and obedience rather than competition and knowledge.

    I gotta tell you that despite knowing this for decades the time it has taken me to come anywhere close Nietzsche is horrifying. His talent is awe inspiring. But once you understand that this is how ‘it is best done’, at least you know what to strive for.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 10:44:00 UTC

  • painful truth. 😉

    https://t.co/s6xNKO1Orfhttps://t.co/s6xNKO1OrfAnother painful truth. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 10:14:00 UTC