Since art is fictional, and therefore analogical, we judge it by its morality first and truthfulness second. If a hero is a marxist it’s immoral. If it promoted abrahamism and marxism it’s immoral. it it misrepresents history it’s immoral. If it’s fiction and it claims to be, and it’s not immoral then it’s neither false nor immoral.
Theme: Truth
-
Art and Natural Law
Since art is fictional, and therefore analogical, we judge it by its morality first and truthfulness second. If a hero is a marxist it’s immoral. If it promoted abrahamism and marxism it’s immoral. it it misrepresents history it’s immoral. If it’s fiction and it claims to be, and it’s not immoral then it’s neither false nor immoral.
-
THE REASON FOR PROPERTARIANISM **We have not much choice in how we think only th
THE REASON FOR PROPERTARIANISM
**We have not much choice in how we think only the interpersonal COMMENSURABILITY OF THE model we think with; and that propertarianism provides both that commensurable model AND the political order that takes best advantage of it**
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-16 12:11:00 UTC
-
Define fact vs theory vs law vs identity. I think by ‘knowable’ you mean we can
Define fact vs theory vs law vs identity. I think by ‘knowable’ you mean we can remember them and make use of them in comparisons.
A fact is a theory of an observation. A theory is a general rule of some precision has survived falsification. A law survives market application.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-15 15:34:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018519269313794048
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018517170945449985
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018517170945449985
-
(a) incommensurable, (b) AND the latter is immeasurable, which is why the concep
(a) incommensurable, (b) AND the latter is immeasurable, which is why the concepts (existential and contiguous with reality vs imaginary and discontiguous with reality) are incommensurable.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-15 15:30:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018518159429652480
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018516873963589632
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018516873963589632
-
That’s a verbalism. I can still test the words written in the book by the same c
That’s a verbalism. I can still test the words written in the book by the same criteria I can test the words stated about it’s constitution.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-15 15:22:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018516249192607744
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018515553382813696
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018515553382813696
-
Nothing exists outside of the testifiable other than fiction. While we may use f
Nothing exists outside of the testifiable other than fiction. While we may use fictions for the purpose of meaning (imprecision) we cannot testify to their truth only to their utility.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-15 15:19:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018515422927360000
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018513871840186369
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018513871840186369
-
Define the statement “truth exists”
Define the statement “truth exists”
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-15 15:18:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018515154319921158
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018512574189572096
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018512574189572096
-
If you knew your logic, you’d grasp that closure does not exist, and you’re maki
If you knew your logic, you’d grasp that closure does not exist, and you’re making an appeal to closure(self reference).
Since we never know we speak the truth, but we can know a falsehood, the false is the only certainty. (And falsifiability is falsifiable.We just can’t do so.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-15 15:15:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018514493482127361
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018510938813681667
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018510938813681667
-
well that’s kind of the point right? You can’t testify to it so you can’t assert
well that’s kind of the point right? You can’t testify to it so you can’t assert it as true.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-15 15:05:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018511845672570880
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018510210418315265
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018510210418315265