Theme: Truth

  • Honesty, Intelligence, and Race OpenPsych , July 17, 2023 As if we needed more e

    Honesty, Intelligence, and Race
    OpenPsych , July 17, 2023
    https://t.co/BgLLPZ2cFs

    As if we needed more evidence. The only people on earth who speak truth before face. And the entire left’s program is meant to undermine it – as is nearly every woman in the west :(. ) It’s a paper by Kirkegaard with his usually zeal.

    –“Research shows that honesty correlates positively with intelligence. Similarly, there are racial differences in honesty, with Europeans being more honest than various other ethnic groups. It is currently unknown to what degree race differences in intelligence can explain the differences in honesty. …

    We replicate prior findings that honesty correlated with measures of intelligence (r = .38, 95% CI [.34, .41]) and that Blacks (d = -0.67, 95% CI [-.76, -.59]) and Hispanics (d = -0.4, 95% CI [-.50, -.31]) are less honest than Whites, and this holds whether honesty is measured by self-reports, interviewer-reports or by parent-reports.

    In addition, race differences in honesty remained between Blacks and Whites but not between Whites and Hispanics after controlling for intelligence. Differences between Blacks and Whites but not Whites and Hispanics were noticeably lower in self-reports (Blacks: d = -0.18 [-0.24, -0.11], Hispanics: d = -0.24 [-0.31, -0.17]) than parent-reports (Blacks: d = -0.43 [-0.52, -0.35], Hispanics: -0.24 [-0.33, -0.15]) and interviewer-reports (Blacks: d = -0.7 [-0.75, -0.64], Hispanics: -0.3 [-0.36, -0.25]).

    Cross-national comparisons were made using national IQ data and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Bayesian model averaging suggests that Hofstede’s individualism dimension (β = .64, PIP = 100%), national IQs (β = .25, PIP = 73.6%), and masculinity (β = -.35, PIP = 100%) predict differences in honesty between countries.

    (CD: Meaning? Collectivism breeds dishonesty.)

    Parking violations per diplomat were only predicted by national IQs (r = -0.28, p < .001), given that no other variable reached a posterior inclusion probability above 0% besides national IQs. Implications and theories concerning these findings are discussed.”–

    (CD: I’m going to fetch that data on parking violations per diplomat and add it to my Countries table of data.)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 00:24:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748139224820301824

  • Honesty, Intelligence, and Race OpenPsych , July 17, 2023 As if we needed more e

    Honesty, Intelligence, and Race
    OpenPsych , July 17, 2023
    https://t.co/BgLLPZ2cFs

    As if we needed more evidence. The only people on earth who speak truth before face. And the entire left’s program is meant to undermine it – as is nearly every woman in the west :(. ) It’s a paper by Kirkegaard with his usually zeal.

    –“Research shows that honesty correlates positively with intelligence. Similarly, there are racial differences in honesty, with Europeans being more honest than various other ethnic groups. It is currently unknown to what degree race differences in intelligence can explain the differences in honesty. …

    We replicate prior findings that honesty correlated with measures of intelligence (r = .38, 95% CI [.34, .41]) and that Blacks (d = -0.67, 95% CI [-.76, -.59]) and Hispanics (d = -0.4, 95% CI [-.50, -.31]) are less honest than Whites, and this holds whether honesty is measured by self-reports, interviewer-reports or by parent-reports.

    In addition, race differences in honesty remained between Blacks and Whites but not between Whites and Hispanics after controlling for intelligence. Differences between Blacks and Whites but not Whites and Hispanics were noticeably lower in self-reports (Blacks: d = -0.18 [-0.24, -0.11], Hispanics: d = -0.24 [-0.31, -0.17]) than parent-reports (Blacks: d = -0.43 [-0.52, -0.35], Hispanics: -0.24 [-0.33, -0.15]) and interviewer-reports (Blacks: d = -0.7 [-0.75, -0.64], Hispanics: -0.3 [-0.36, -0.25]).

    Cross-national comparisons were made using national IQ data and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Bayesian model averaging suggests that Hofstede’s individualism dimension (β = .64, PIP = 100%), national IQs (β = .25, PIP = 73.6%), and masculinity (β = -.35, PIP = 100%) predict differences in honesty between countries.

    (CD: Meaning? Collectivism breeds dishonesty.)

    Parking violations per diplomat were only predicted by national IQs (r = -0.28, p < .001), given that no other variable reached a posterior inclusion probability above 0% besides national IQs. Implications and theories concerning these findings are discussed.”–

    (CD: I’m going to fetch that data on parking violations per diplomat and add it to my Countries table of data.)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 00:23:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748139069211549697

  • Poetisch. Wahrheit. Charmant. 😉

    Poetisch. Wahrheit. Charmant. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-18 20:09:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748075108818661825

    Reply addressees: @BsLehrer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748074631813103958

  • “All testimony may be speech, but not all speech is testimony.” (truth is enough

    “All testimony may be speech, but not all speech is testimony.”

    (truth is enough)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-18 19:19:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748062554037907828

  • Disappointment: Conservatives who engage in the feminine method of truth evasion

    Disappointment: Conservatives who engage in the feminine method of truth evasion

    Disappointment:
    Conservatives who engage in the feminine method of truth evasion. Followed by conservatives who can’t manage intellectual discourse, and try to drag the conversation into some shallow moralizing or emotional context, so that they can experience cathartic feels.… https://t.co/XBJ8V9T0j9


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-17 21:42:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747736085059219465

  • (Unsolicited advice because you have promise: Try to say the same thing without

    (Unsolicited advice because you have promise: Try to say the same thing without the copula (verb to-be) such as is, are, was, were, being, been. If you can’t it means you don’t understand how such a thing is brought into existence. It prevents you from making false equivalencies…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 23:42:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747041673907958056

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747018988809327045

  • RT @SurragoMichael: @DieterKief @curtdoolittle Logic is as natural as prediction

    RT @SurragoMichael: @DieterKief @curtdoolittle Logic is as natural as prediction. If prediction is unnatural, logic must be too.

    Logic can…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 18:44:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746966540497400176

  • THE VALUE OF THE MARKET FOR “WRONG” While we humans favor discovering what works

    THE VALUE OF THE MARKET FOR “WRONG”
    While we humans favor discovering what works, and so we try to emphasize innovative discoveries, the path to discover those innovations is a record of failures.

    In my work operationalizing the sciences, I’ve found that most of my insights come from a consistent source:
    1) The tendency of all thinkers across the spectrum to opine and discuss matters beyond their field of competency and into the broader field of incompetency.
    2) The observation of the market competition between between these mistakes, biases, errors and falsehoods.
    3) The ease at discovering the ‘coincidences of wrongs’ suggesting what cognitive errors the individuals are making.
    4) The correction of the cognitive errors, and how that changes how one can interpret the sources upon which they have based these errors.

    This strategy requires largely that one have a fairly accurate epistemology and a fairly accurate understanding of the simplicity of the Ternary Logic of the universe. But more importantly, that one develops an intuition for the consistency of the spectrum of biases, mistakes, errors, and frankly, self and other deceits, that humans are want to engage in. My work has quite by accident resulted in a deep study of human ignorance error bias and deceit.

    So there is value in the market for ‘wrongs’. Not only in assisting in discovering ‘rights’, but in discovering the behavior of mankind in the production of wrongs and rights further advising us on the production of more rights than wrongs. 😉

    Cheers
    -CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 16:35:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746934226065203200

  • THE VALUE OF THE MARKET FOR “WRONG” While we humans favor discovering what works

    THE VALUE OF THE MARKET FOR “WRONG”
    While we humans favor discovering what works, and so we try to emphasize innovative discoveries, the path to discover those innovations is a record of failures.

    In my work operationalizing the sciences, I’ve found that most of my insights come from a consistent source:
    1) The tendency of all thinkers across the spectrum to opinine and discuss matters beyond their field of competency and into the broader field of incompetency.
    2) The observation of the market competition between between these mistakes, biases, errors and falsehoods.
    3) The ease at discovering the ‘coincidences of wrongs’ suggesting what cognitive errors the individuals are making.
    4) The correction of the cognitive errors, and how that changes how one can interpret the sources upon which they have made these errors.

    This strategy requires largely that one have a fairly accurate epistemology and a fairly accurate undersetanding of the simplicity of the Ternary Logic of the universe. But more importantly, that one develops an intuition for the consistency of the spectrum of biases, mistsakes, errors, and frankly, self and other deceits, that humans are want to engage in. My work has quite by accident resulted in a deep study of human ignorance error bias and deceit.

    So there is value in the market for ‘wrongs’. Not only in assisting in discovering ‘rights’, but in discovering the behavior of mankind in the production of wrongs and rights further advising us on the production of more rights than wrongs. 😉

    Cheers
    -CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 16:35:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746932278247256064

  • They thought. You thought. We know. That’s the difference. 😉

    They thought. You thought. We know. That’s the difference. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 01:14:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746702359919563251

    Reply addressees: @GPEditor

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745889065419911569