Theme: Truth

  • There are no people that can refute me. There are people who only play supernatu

    There are no people that can refute me. There are people who only play supernatural or sophistic games, or claim that some other solution is superior. Well, good. Those are competing ideas but they are’t a criticism of mine. There still AREN’T any.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-04 00:24:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102364252751491072

    Reply addressees: @camelback_t

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102363649425977344


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102363649425977344

  • If we fail it will because the majority of idiots in the world can tell the diff

    If we fail it will because the majority of idiots in the world can tell the difference between truth, sophism, and sarcasm. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-04 00:08:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102360143151411200

    Reply addressees: @realjoshneal

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102328307331334144


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102328307331334144

  • STOICISM, PROPERTARIANISM, ECONOMICS, HISTORY ARE THE BEST WE CAN DO. There will

    STOICISM, PROPERTARIANISM, ECONOMICS, HISTORY ARE THE BEST WE CAN DO.

    There will always be hyper conservatives, sophists, pseudoscientists, supernaturalists on the right.

    There will always be hedonists (hyper consumption), sophists, pseudoscientist and occultists on the left.

    The best we can do is provide education in mindfulness, propertarianism, history to reduce their numbers

    Stoicism => Self

    Propertarianism => Others

    Economics => Polities

    History => Mankind.

    #post


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-03 12:26:00 UTC

  • NO MORE LIES —“@Curt Doolittle If I have an idea, a theory, yet don’t have the

    NO MORE LIES

    —“@Curt Doolittle If I have an idea, a theory, yet don’t have the evidence yet–it still might be true. The Higgs Boson comes to mind. It was an idea, a theory, there were no facts yet to prove it, it fit in with the standard model, itself a theory, and solved some problems in quantum mechanics, but it wasn’t until the particle was actually discovered by the LHC that we could call it true. So was it a lie before then? You can’t always exactly know what’s true. Some questions are unsettled. So we make assumptions to try things out. It’s not exactly faith but it’s like it. It requires that we temporarily believe in it to test it, to question it, to try and figure it out. All part of reasoning. Maybe you didn’t mean what you said to this depth, what you wrote seems to make perfect sense on the surface, but through a little questioning, seeking to drill down, to get to the essence and the fundamentals of things, it seemed to me to be a little imprecise. This is not to simply be disputatious, to be contrary, not to be mean or anything, your statement was a fine, stimulating, sentiment, but to honestly question.​”— Mark Wright

    We do not have faith or temporarily believe in anything. We seek only to discover by testing that which is testable. And we limit ourselves to that limit.

    1) such things are testable and falsifiable.

    2) such things preserve the parsimony of naturalism,

    3) such things are not counter to all of historical evidence, nor commensurate with the long history of ignorance error, fraud, and deceit

    4) such things serve as no premise for consequent inference likewise for fraud and deceit,

    5) such things are not dependent on verbal pretense or sophism,

    6) such things are not claimed true only speculative,

    7) such things have no malincentive to lie, or preserve a lie.

    8) Conversely what i argued against was the opposite of all those tests.

    It is not arrogance but intolerance for the continued use of lies against my people by those in conscious or unconscious league with the ancient enemy of not only my people but all of mankind.

    No more lies.

    #post


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 19:21:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53055632_10157022816182264_721457080

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53055632_10157022816182264_7214570804078444544_n_10157022816177264.jpg Attacking my intolerance as arrogance only serves to demonstrate my arguments.Alex BrocklehurstI’ve never understood those who play the arrogance card. Why not simply stand on the merit of one’s own arguments?

    I get blocked regularly because folk just do not wish to have sustained engagement. They say “you always have to be right” – which is disingenuous, because they would not venture a view themselves if they did not think they were right.

    People who engage others by pointing out ‘character flaws’ should be ignored. They demonstrate that they have little to offer.Mar 2, 2019, 3:35 PMLee C WaaksAlex: “My apologies for not changing my mind on the spot to suit your sensibilities.”Mar 2, 2019, 4:28 PMAlex BrocklehurstHey Lee! How you doing? :-)Mar 2, 2019, 4:29 PMAlex BrocklehurstAs in, since our meet up online with Ray Scott Percival..Mar 2, 2019, 4:33 PMJohn KellyDon’t know if this is appropriate but here goes: “And all these Men gathered upon high buildings, through the cold of night, locked arm in arm with blood in their eyes and fire in their veins; academe had never seen such terrible conviction…as they took back the campuses – Hundreds NO, Thousands bellowed before the long nailed Cowards of our time…In complete syncronization they cried aloud: IN-TOL- ER-ANCE! IN-TOL-ER-ANCE! …. The deep male voices shook the earth and never had our enemies felt the full iron weight of their most feared opponent: THE TRUTH…the takeover of truth and those willing to die for it to be crowned King once more… would never be stopped!”

    Intolerance, gentleman!Mar 2, 2019, 11:58 PMHolly Morrigan”intellectual arrogance” = I have a dismal vocabulary.Mar 3, 2019, 11:28 PMAttacking my intolerance as arrogance only serves to demonstrate my arguments.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 14:42:00 UTC

  • GOVERNMENT UNDER PROPERTARIANISM, NOT PROPERTARIAN GOVERNMENT. (AND THE ABSOLUTI

    GOVERNMENT UNDER PROPERTARIANISM, NOT PROPERTARIAN GOVERNMENT. (AND THE ABSOLUTIST QUESTION)

    (core)

    Propertarianism consists of a methodology for producing truthful, rational, reciprocal, commensurable fully accounted speech that all but prohibits error, bias, deceit, and fraud. And the application of that method to the scope of human knowledge, producing a universal vocabulary and grammar commensurable across all disciplines.

    With this methodology, applied to law, you can produce arguments, constitutions and bodies of law, that are fully commensurable, fully accounted, and prohibit error, bias, deceit, and fraud.

    With these arguments, constitutions, and bodies of law you can produce any form of government – you just must do so truthfully with full accounting and transparency.

    There is no ideal form of government because different forms of government are more or less suitable to different demographic distributions, degrees of neoteny, states of cooperative (middle class) development, and more or less suitable to times of war, peace, and windfalls.

    There is however, an optimum system of government for european peoples, and any other peoples who wish to produce european standards of life, because this form of government provides the greatest limitation on rents, greatest incentive for production distribution and trade, and the greatest adaptability to change, greatest rates of innovation, and the greatest shared rewards (commons) because of all of the above.

    That system of government consists in:

    A Federation (nomocracy).

    Of Nation States.

    Under Rule of Law:

    …Federally Limited to material conflicts between polities.

    …Locally unlimited production of commons.

    …Each Administered by an Independent Judiciary.

    And Defended by:

    …A Universal militia

    …In Regimental Orders

    …And a Cadre of Professional Warriors.

    And either Limited Monarchy:

    …A Hereditary Monarchy

    …A Professional Cabinet

    …Houses of Juries by Class (assent, veto)

    …Privatized Bureaucracies

    Or Narrowly Participatory Monarchy:

    …A Hereditary Monarchy (assent, veto)

    …A Professional Cabinet

    …Houses as a Market between Classes (market)

    …Privatized Bureaucracies

    Or Broadly Participatory Monarchy:

    …A Hereditary Monarchy (assent, veto)

    …A Professional Cabinet

    …Virtual Houses as a Market between Classes (market)

    …Privatized Bureaucracies

    With each state producing commons suitable to the interests and desires of the people.

    I work under the model of progressive decline in sovereignty given ability to organize. The lesson of the soviet model is that

    (Authoritarian )

    Monarchy

    Military

    Warriors

    Judiciary

    Sheriffs

    Police

    (Market)

    Finance, Scientific Elites, Academic Elites

    Entrepreneur, Scientists, Professors

    professional, researchers, teachers

    administrator, research assistants, media.

    (Mixed Market)

    craftsman,

    laborer,

    dependents,

    (Non-Market)

    Soldiers

    Serfs

    Slaves

    Prisoners


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 10:25:00 UTC

  • The truth is always anti-something or other. Otherwise we wouldn’t need it

    The truth is always
    anti-something or other.
    Otherwise we wouldn’t need it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 18:01:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101542949131677696

  • Small sample. Questionable sample. Questionable test method. Question set provok

    Small sample. Questionable sample. Questionable test method. Question set provokes confirmation. No “skin in the game” questions.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 13:14:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101470718460596224

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101094793176858624


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    Higher intelligence does not provide the slightest protection against susceptibility to foolish beliefs.
    https://t.co/4qsZvTItD2 https://t.co/amvCX1KQB7

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101094793176858624

  • The truth is always anti-something or other. Otherwise we wouldn’t need it

    The truth is always

    anti-something or other.

    Otherwise we wouldn’t need it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 13:01:00 UTC

  • TEST OF ABRAHAMIC RELIGION What are priests selling in exchange for income and s

    TEST OF ABRAHAMIC RELIGION

    What are priests selling in exchange for income and status?

    Is christianity history or mythology, true or poetic?

    Is there life after death or not?

    Is it truly wisdom or is it a means of self deception?

    If you learned stoicism instead of christianity, and if you learned history and science instead of mythology and supernaturalism would you and your people live a better life?

    Why did we rise out of superstition ignorance and poverty once we restored aristotelian thought, and literacy rather than semitic thought and illiteracy?

    Why did we have such a drastic increase in quality of life after the church was no longer able to prey upon the people through rents and tithes?

    Why are we vulnerable to marxism, postmodernism, and feminism if it is not for christianity?

    Why is christianity taught and argued using the same techniques as marxism, postmodernism, and feminism?

    Why do christians let our people be conquered rather than fight like the pagans do?

    Why are pagans and atheists so desirous of conflict and the christians cowardice?

    TEST OF RECIPROCITY

    Productive (fail) it’s parasitic.

    Fully informed (fail) it’s totally false.

    Warrantied (fail) they can’t warranty supernatural.

    Voluntary (fail) threat if you don’t comply

    Free of Externality: the externalities are suicidal.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:51:00 UTC