—“This technique forces you to speak in “is” rather than “ought”.”–Oliver Croke
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-28 05:42:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100994660724543488
Theme: Truth
-
“This technique forces you to speak in “is” rather than “ought”.”–Oliver Croke
—“This technique forces you to speak in “is” rather than “ought”.”–Oliver Croke
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-28 00:42:00 UTC
-
THE TRUTH DOESN’T SEEK YOUR APPROVAL Christians were the marxists/postmodernists
THE TRUTH DOESN’T SEEK YOUR APPROVAL
Christians were the marxists/postmodernists/feminists of the ancient world. The destroyers of aristocratic civilization.
There is no difference between christianity and postmodernism other than supernatural vs pseudoscientific.
The supernatural christians are being genocided by their pseudoscientific young.
The search for power by lies, in exchange for the psychological comfort of lies.
It’s literally a drug by other means.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-27 08:52:00 UTC
-
So I can testify to something or not. I can perform an action or not. I can test
So I can testify to something or not. I can perform an action or not. I can test your statement as testifiable and actionable or not. I am not sure what you are asking. And you cannot answer without giving me definitions, the result of which would demonstrate my argument. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 19:58:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100485284645478402
Reply addressees: @Constantinus331 @Societisms
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100482528857731082
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100482528857731082
-
I asked you for definitions because I don’t understand what you’re saying. If yo
I asked you for definitions because I don’t understand what you’re saying. If you can give me definitions maybe I can. I mean, what does ‘accept’ mean? What does ‘deny mean/? These are, archaic theological terms. So I don’t understand them.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 19:56:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100484883800080387
Reply addressees: @Constantinus331 @Societisms
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100482528857731082
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100482528857731082
-
Define accept, define deny, define true. I do not know what ‘deny truth’ means.
Define accept, define deny, define true. I do not know what ‘deny truth’ means. I only know only what ‘truth CAN’ possibly mean, since only the definition I gave you is possible. Strawson(Performative-Promissory) -> Doolittle (Testimonial, Operational, Warrantied, Insured, )
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 19:40:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100480641483923457
Reply addressees: @Constantinus331 @Societisms
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100476464749834243
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100476464749834243
-
Define truth for me will you? Is it, or can it exist as, anything other than a p
Define truth for me will you? Is it, or can it exist as, anything other than a promise and warranty that one’s testimony is consistent, correspondent, operational, complete, and coherent – and free of error, bias, fictionalism, and deceit?
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 19:10:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100473299409293313
Reply addressees: @Constantinus331 @Societisms
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100470707295866886
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100470707295866886
-
ie: falsification, warranty, and action vs justification, excuse, and language
ie: falsification, warranty, and action vs justification, excuse, and language.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 18:28:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100462744866902016
Reply addressees: @Constantinus331 @Societisms
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100461849479446528
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100461849479446528
-
I’m saying I don’t ‘accept’ anything. I’m saying I can’t falsify them, and ergo
I’m saying I don’t ‘accept’ anything. I’m saying I can’t falsify them, and ergo I can’t testify to anything otherwise. (a) you’re relying on justification, (b) presumption of closure in language and ‘claim’ and I’m on action and testimony. You excuse me due diligence. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 18:28:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100462598628302849
Reply addressees: @Constantinus331 @Societisms
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100461849479446528
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100461849479446528
-
well I probably understand the meaning of logic more deeply than you do by that
well I probably understand the meaning of logic more deeply than you do by that statement, since we could not speak unless those laws were inviolable, and that my reason is limited by those laws, and available information. However, I know all other alternatives are lies.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 18:12:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100458629549961216
Reply addressees: @Constantinus331 @Societisms
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100457536300433414
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100457536300433414