I DON”T DO MGTOW, I FIX THE PROBLEM
While I understand the sentiment, and understand the need to restore masculinity, I don’t MGTOW – I only do truth, reciprocity, compatibilism, markets,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496026940994201&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:58:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189572343607255040
INTUITION IS UNDERSTOOD, SORRY. ITS NOT COMPLICATED
—“Any thoughts on empiricism ever incorporating intuition into its epistemology? It is, though not yet understood, a sensory… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496025434327685&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:56:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189571781687951361
THE REASON MEN WANT P-EDUCATION?
They know they’ve been lied to. They, they know they were taught falsehoods, and they want an education in the truth. The only reason I can teach is because there is a demand for truth.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:40:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189567651883950080
DON’T HATE, WE DON’T NEED TO
We don’t need to ‘hate’ anyone, we simply need the “rule of law of reciprocity”, and must insist on truthful and reciprocal speech to the public in public matters, as well as voluntary association and disassociation.
The left are the haters and can’t succeed without lying and sowing discord between genders, classes, and identities.
With the “Winning Right”, the rule of law of RECIPROCITY, insistence on truth, voluntary association and disassociation, the losing left would group together in localities where they can create their own local laws and norms suited to their wants and needs. What’s great about that? They couldn’t infect the rest of us with their ideological hell.
Thanks to: John Mark and Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:27:00 UTC
I DON’T DO HUMILITY. IT’S DISHONEST. 😉
–“Good, you’re learning humbleness”—Giego Caleiro
That’s unlikely. It’s that I’ve finished the research project, and have moved on to explanation and application. So I’m not attacking ideas to learn how to disambiguate them. I’m just working on explaining everything with spectra of market demands rather than monopoly ideals.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:24:00 UTC
IT’S BECAUSE BAD RELIGIONS LIE AND LAG, GOOD RELIGIONS USE TRUTH AND LEAD
—“All religions are made up bullshit to control people”—Joanna
Hmmm… Let’s look at this:
PERSONAL DEMAND
. Demand for personal mindfulness
. . Demand for interpersonal mindfulness
. . . Demand for social mindfulness
. . . . Demand for political mindfulness
POLITICAL DEMAND
.. organization (control, conflict suppression)
.. .. vs educate (helpful system of measurement)
.. .. .. vs create a polity (helpful system of measurement)
.. .. .. .. vs create a justification for conquest (not so helpful)
TECHNOLOGICAL DEMAND
…Religion (oral parable) is the optimum means of education prior to writing.
… … Organized religion (written parable) is dependent upon writing and argument, but not literacy
… … … Natural Law is dependent upon literacy, logic and science.
CURRENT CONDITION
So yeah, but they were the only technology available.
We have
… Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (Repair)
… … Self Authoring Virtues (Stoic Method) (improve)
… … … Self Choice (epicureanism – living well within means)
… … … … Natural law of Reciprocity, Independent Judiciary
… … … … … History, Reason, science, technology, prosperity.
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY
And we can use:
… Heroic History of Western (or man’s) Ascent
… … Stoic Ritual, Hero/Saint ‘worship’ (thanks, counsel)
… … … Religion: Lesson (history), Play (ritual), Thanks (worship, prayer), Oath(promise), Feast (communal reward), Festival (communal celebration), Sport (community bonding).
… … … … Civic Participation: Family, Jury, Commons Production, emergency service production; Hospitaliers Production, and Defense (war) production.
… … … … … The Natural Law of Reciprocity, an independent judiciary, and a jury of our peers.
REASON
… Because we have ancestors worthy of our debt to them, and because we can create (easily) our debt to one another.
STRATEGY
“Embrace, conquer, and domesticate reality – together – do not cower from it.”
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:20:00 UTC
WHICH OF YOUR COGNITIVE MARKETS ARE YOU SERVING?
The verb to be circumvents existence, which is what you are trying to cirumvent testifying for, just as Heiddeger was trying to cirvument and reverse the verb and noun – because both of you are tyint go make speech conform to experience rather than speech test experience – which is it’s only POSSIBLE function unless you’re trying to lie.
All imagination is produced by association and introspective causes justificationary but all speech like all action is falsificationary – whether or not we wish it to be.
So you can describe your predictions, imaginations and fantasies (meaning) in an effort to deceive yourself and others, or you can speak your predictions, imaginations and fantasies (meaning) and have others falsify them or not, or you can act on your predications, imaginations, and fantasies (meaning) and physical reality will falsify them or not.
We are capable of free association, imagination (prediction), and fiction (relations between predictions), just as we capable of our own falsification of our fictions (reason, calculation, computation). But this requires agency, and to prefer the rewards of knowledge (truth) over masturbation( sedation by daydreaming) .
So we physically demonstrate the series: sense(collection), perception(disambiguation), auto-association (free association), prediction (imagination), fictions (compositions) produce hypotheses, and THEN we falsify (test) them (detect risk and losses) using Reason, Calculation (transformation of inputs into outputs) and computation (using assistants-to-memory to overcome limits – something a we cannot do without external instrumentation, especially symbols that preserve correspondence-name, and other properties of the name-noun expressed as measurements of varying degrees of precision.)
So the question is which market are you serving when you speak? Purely psychological (psychotic), purely personal interpretation of interpersonal (solipsistic), interpersonal (empathic), practical action (evidentiary), generalization (analytic), generalization without empathy (aspergers), failure to generalize or empathize (autism).
And this is the underlying question. Are you preventing your learning and continuous adaptation to reality by the incremental development of agency, or are you trying to do the opposite which is the primary function of all religions, and most philosophies, and most pseudoscience, and that is to justify not paying the psychological, emotional, physical, and material costs of adapting to reality such that you develop agency? And always and everywhere with very little effort we can ask any individual a few questions, and discover the economics of his or her system of decidability, given costs and returns. (my favorite being christians, muslims, and hindus, as we do not see this other than ‘nationalism’ in the far east and the non-superstitious right, and the upper classes who have and have demonstrated agency.
We don’t think of language as a system of measurement (but measurement of what?) but a cursory disambiguation and operationalization of english vocabulary (names of references, whether person, place, thing, action, change etc – reduced to scales that are open to human perception. As an example, Time in english includes always – sometimes – just a bit ago – now – not just a bit ago – sometimes not, and never. Most english vocabulary follows this 3 to 5 to 7 example range, which is about the maximum of human means of disambiguation into scopes of untidily; matches human short term memory; matches the number of points necessary to falsify a line (reduce most errors). I find when I disambiguate a concept that is not well understood because of insufficient operationalization, I end up with twelve or more points. I find that when I serialize existing terms I end up with five or seven.
And this difference illustrates the function of operationalization – to improve precision in human speech.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:20:00 UTC
IF YOU WANT TO LEARN P
Propertarianism is like Aristotelianism – it is a huge project that reforms much human thought especially logic, language, epistemology (knowledge), psychology, sociology, ethics, law, and politics.
1. You can learn about our proposed constitution and it’s policies (it’s a lot, and you might have to learn a bit bout economics and the justice system but you can do it.)
2. You can learn the Big History of the competition between civilizations and in particular between European and Semitic.(easy)
3. You can learn why Europeans evolved faster than the rest, and developed the only truth telling, high trust, wealthy, advanced, technological, civilization in so short a span in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – except for our period of failure during the Abrahamic dark age. (relatively easy)
4. You can learn a whole suite of the propertarian arguments (Takes some work)
5. You can learn how to conduct propertarian arguments
You can learn how to use the p-methodology (Not easy)
6. And you can if you want to get into the foundations of the P-methodology, the completed scientific method, and logic and epistemology. (Hard)
SO IF YOU WANT TO LEARN ANY OF THAT
1) you can use the site and read it.
2) you can follow along.
3) you can use my (Curt) friends list to contact and catch the attention of a mentor by asking for help:
Alain, Martin, Bill, Luke, Brandon, Erik, Steve, Eli, …(there are a lot more)
4) you can take our course (if you are patient enough for me to slowly release content – and I mean slowly).
The other folks are better teachers than I am. Really. By far.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:17:00 UTC
TRUTH IN HUMOR: THE HISTORY OF ENTREPRENEURIAL WARFARE
(or “We wuz pirates!”)
The Templars started out as ‘the poor knights’ as shown by two men on horseback. The Hospitaliers were not poor. They had money, arms, fleets of ships, and took territory. The Vikings were entrepreneurial warriors. The romans were entrepreneurial conquerors. The Greeks were entrepreneurial warriors. The indo europeans were entrepreneurial conquerors. Why do you think we live under the long tradition of Severity, Reciprocity, Jury, Truth, Duty, and Contract? Because we have descended from entrepreneurial warfare.
Now if I could just get my fellow western MEN to understand that we are historically entrepreneurial warriors – colonialists, pirates, vikings, in every age, and that it was only the Peace of Westphalia under which our ancestors prohibited us from ‘entrepreneurial war’, and limited warfare to the states.
Russia, Iran, and the Muslims and the Jews have broken the Peace of Westphalia, and returned us to a war of all against all, which is the reason for our continuous defeat in central asia and the middle east.
To restore our people we must return to our long tradition in the industrialization of ‘entrepreneurial warfare’. Meaning “war for adventure, fun, and profit”. It’s the civic nationalists and the christians so cuckolded that they can’t comprehend this – and those of us who are ‘aryans’, ‘pagans’, ‘raiders’, ‘pirates’ and ‘conquerors and colonizers’ and natural entrepreneurial warriors that are willing to return to ‘revolution as a for profit industry”.
This is why you want leaders. You’re still ‘Cucks’ to the state and the ‘church’. You need permission.
But European Men don’t need leaders to hoist the jolly roger, pillage, plunder, and burn the house down. To engage in conquest for fun and profit? Only cowards do. 😉
Happy to ‘knight’ you if it’ll make you feel better.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:06:00 UTC
I DON”T DO MGTOW, I FIX THE PROBLEM
While I understand the sentiment, and understand the need to restore masculinity, I don’t MGTOW – I only do truth, reciprocity, compatibilism, markets, and anti-feminism, anti-marxism, anti-postmodernism, and re-masculinization through restoration of bonding through competition and achievement, and re-militarization to preserve hierarchy in role, equality in value, self sacrifice for the common good.
You do not see me in MGTOW circles. MGTOW is an expression of withdrawal, in the christian and buddhist models, not an expression of achievement or restoration. The movement exists because men feel they can only achieve individually improvement, instead collective improvement of in civic groups. This again was the product of feminism in eduction, both undermining male boding by competition, and male bonding by military conflict, and male bonding in commercial endeavors, and male bonding in civic improvement.
MGTOW is the incorrect strategy. Instead it is restoration of male social orders that create male tribal spaces, leaving women to their nesting spaces. We must restore the destruction of male civc organizations by the feminists using the court system, to deprive men of the equivalent of the female brood and her gossip circle of friends.
We must eliminate the dysgenia of the state incentives to redistribute disproportionate male contribution to state revenues, to disproportionate female consumption of state services, without reciprocal exchange. End common property, alimony, child support, and women must fund ‘women’s issues’ with their revenues. Just as men musts fund ‘mens issues’ with their revenues. Unless they exchange in trades.
We must restore reciprocity and compatibility. And to do that we must threaten retribution and restitution, by equal and opposite means. Which is how I argue the return to compromise: “We can easily reverse asymmetric female benefit from asymmetric male contribution, so that male asymmetric contribution remains male asymmetric benefit. Or we can compromise and return to exchanges that is the very reason why western women had standing to abuse any asymmetric benefit.
1. MGTOW to restore male self-care – reconstructive education and therapy.
2. Teach Stoic Method, Masculine Aryan Virtues-Feminine Christian Values, Epicurean Means
3. Restore voluntary association and disassociation in law.
4. Restore men’s sport, military, trade, commercial, and civilc organizations.
5. De-Financialize the economy, and end consumer interest, to restore working and middle class reproduction, and restore rates of reproduction.
6. Restore the “church” under secular, traditional, christian-feminine, and pagan-masculine options instead of the academy-state as the central organ of education, family, and family finance, creating the most advanced system of family support ever existing in human history.
7. Reform academy by limiting it to the teaching of courses in calculative and operationally constructible methods; cause all colleges and universities to warranty their services; cause all colleges and universities to carry any and all student debt – payable within six years; restore the division of grades 8+ to trades, clerical, managerial, professional, entrepreneurial, financial, and scientific specialization. And have children in education overlap ages in this classroom to compensate for different rates of development, or separate into classrooms again by degree of development that masks the fact that the principle difference between us is the tradeoff between rate of physical maturity and rate of leaning increasingly complex content.(and ending stigmas that wrongly stick thru life). Yes we are all in the end different in cognitive complexity we are not different in achievement within our degree of cognitive complexity. This is the issue. We can learn conscientiousness to some degree even if we cannot learn to learn complexity faster.
8. Restore all production of commons to the sphere of influence and responsibility over the commons, but limiting the federal to it’s functions, state and city-state to its functions, county to its functions, locality to its functions, neighborhood to its functions, and family to its functions and individual to his functions.
This will restore mutual consideration and care, the civic society only europeans developed, and the high trust civilization upon which all of our privileges both western and across all mankind derived.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:58:00 UTC