Theme: Truth

  • INTUITION IS UNDERSTOOD, SORRY. ITS NOT COMPLICATED —“Any thoughts on empirici

    INTUITION IS UNDERSTOOD, SORRY. ITS NOT COMPLICATED

    —“Any thoughts on empiricism ever incorporating intuition into its epistemology? It is, though not yet understood, a sensory experience.”—Jarrod Marma

    I don’t make errors. Operational simplification: Sensation(nerves), perception(cortex), integration (entorhinal cortex), experience(hippocampal region), auto-association( hippocampal subregion), attention (thalamus), projection(frontal cortex), retention (prefrontal cortex), recursion (repeat).

    intuition = auto association (involuntary), free association(voluntary focus of attention)

    If you read testimonialism you will find that I’ve repeated it for years now.

    sense(stimulation), perception (disambiguation), auto-association, free association, hypothesis(reason), theory(empiricism), law(survival), recursion(partial falsification).

    The brain (you) consists of a nervous system consisting almost entirely of variations on one cell type (neuron) of different compositions for different functions, the most numerous variation of which is (surprisingly) inhibition of information, the most influential of which are one type which calculate information.

    We cannot make computeres do the same thing at the same cost because in exchange for perfect memory, computers use fixed wiring and dynamic routing, where your brain uses both dynamic wiring and with it dynamic routing. So we have vast adaptability, and storage in exchange for recreation of memories through associations, whereas computers have precise recollection, l limited adaptability, and require far more physical storage because they have to store all the underlying sensory data. Current computer neural networks learn and no longer need to retain the sensory data they were trained with but they cannot be adapted to additional functions without training and re-structuring (yet). There are very good at single things so the future will likely consist of many basic functions performed by artificial neural networks, combined by a ‘grammar’ into a hierarchy of neural networks. our ‘grammar’ is spatial – because we must act. That does not mean computers will need a spatial grammar as well, because we might design it to act by different means – but I can’t conceive yet of an alternative other than property transactions, which are then handed off too another AI to act upon.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:56:00 UTC

  • THE REASON MEN WANT P-EDUCATION? They know they’ve been lied to. They, they know

    THE REASON MEN WANT P-EDUCATION?

    They know they’ve been lied to. They, they know they were taught falsehoods, and they want an education in the truth. The only reason I can teach is because there is a demand for truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:39:00 UTC

  • INTUITION IS UNDERSTOOD, SORRY. ITS NOT COMPLICATED —“Any thoughts on empirici

    INTUITION IS UNDERSTOOD, SORRY. ITS NOT COMPLICATED

    —“Any thoughts on empiricism ever incorporating intuition into its epistemology? It is, though not yet understood, a sensory experience.”—Jarrod Marma

    I don’t make errors. Operational simplification: Sensation(nerves), perception(cortex), integration (entorhinal cortex), experience(hippocampal region), auto-association( hippocampal subregion), attention (thalamus), projection(frontal cortex), retention (prefrontal cortex), recursion (repeat).

    intuition = auto association (involuntary), free association(voluntary focus of attention)

    If you read testimonialism you will find that I’ve repeated it for years now.

    sense(stimulation), perception (disambiguation), auto-association, free association, hypothesis(reason), theory(empiricism), law(survival), recursion(partial falsification).

    The brain (you) consists of a nervous system consisting almost entirely of variations on one cell type (neuron) of different compositions for different functions, the most numerous variation of which is (surprisingly) inhibition of information, the most influential of which are one type which calculate information.

    We cannot make computeres do the same thing at the same cost because in exchange for perfect memory, computers use fixed wiring and dynamic routing, where your brain uses both dynamic wiring and with it dynamic routing. So we have vast adaptability, and storage in exchange for recreation of memories through associations, whereas computers have precise recollection, l limited adaptability, and require far more physical storage because they have to store all the underlying sensory data. Current computer neural networks learn and no longer need to retain the sensory data they were trained with but they cannot be adapted to additional functions without training and re-structuring (yet). There are very good at single things so the future will likely consist of many basic functions performed by aritificial neural networks, combined by a ‘grammar’ into a hierarchy of neural netowrks. our ‘grammar’ is spatial – because we must act. That does not mean computers will need a spatial grammar as well, because we might design it to act by different means – but I can’t concieve yet of an alternative other than property transactions, which are then handed off too another AI to act upon.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:13:00 UTC

  • THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX As in all things there is no paradox, just an open que

    THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX

    As in all things there is no paradox, just an open question, no paradoxes exist.

    One can falsify the fermi question. It is falsifiable.We have failed to falsify it.

    One cannot disprove, only fail to provide a proof of possibility in an axiomatic system like mathematics, and reality is a theoretic system, not axiomatic.

    At present it is falsifiable, un-falsified, and undecidable, and therefore all we can say is that “we don’t know yet”.

    The most obvious reasons are:

    1 – Technological (EMR is a primitive technology)

    2 – Differences are such that we would be of no trading (cooperative) value; interfering would only create a competitor; and it is too early for a colonization effort to have reached us given the recent development of EMR broadcasting.

    3 – Time and distance window of opportunity

    4 – We are in a calm location between arms, in a calm (dying) galaxy, and have had long enough period of growth to ‘bake’ in necessary conditions

    5 – I am concerned that the spinning liquid iron core of our planet that creates its defensive field is rarer than we imagine, and as such it is much harder for life to have time to bake. taken to the extreme, the question may be, now many planets can survive four to five billion years, in a safe rural area of a galaxy, in the habitable (water) zone, while maintaining a spinning liquid iron core?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 10:36:00 UTC

  • I DON”T DO MGTOW, I FIX THE PROBLEM While I understand the sentiment, and unders

    I DON”T DO MGTOW, I FIX THE PROBLEM

    While I understand the sentiment, and understand the need to restore masculinity, I don’t MGTOW – I only do truth, reciprocity, compatibilism, markets, and anti-feminism, anti-marxism, anti-postmodernism, and re-masculinization through restoration of bonding through competition and achievement, and re-militarization to preserve hierarchy in role, equality in value, self sacrifice for the common good.

    You do not see me in MGTOW circles. MGTOW is an expression of withdrawal, in the christian and buddhist models, not an expression of achievement or restoration. The movement exists because men feel they can only achieve individually improvement, instead collective improvement of in civic groups. This again was the product of feminism in eduction, both undermining male boding by competition, and male bonding by military conflict, and male bonding in commercial endeavors, and male bonding in civic improvement.

    MGTOW is the incorrect strategy. Instead it is restoration of male social orders that create male tribal spaces, leaving women to their nesting spaces. We must restore the destruction of male civc organizations by the feminists using the court system, to deprive men of the equivalent of the female brood and her gossip circle of friends.

    We must eliminate the dysgenia of the state incentives to redistribute disproportionate male contribution to state revenues, to disproportionate female consumption of state services, without reciprocal exchange. End common property, alimony, child support, and women must fund ‘women’s issues’ with their revenues. Just as men musts fund ‘mens issues’ with their revenues. Unless they exchange in trades.

    We must restore reciprocity and compatibility. And to do that we must threaten retribution and restitution, by equal and opposite means. Which is how I argue the return to compromise: “We can easily reverse asymmetric female benefit from asymmetric male contribution, so that male asymmetric contribution remains male asymmetric benefit. Or we can compromise and return to exchanges that is the very reason why western women had standing to abuse any asymmetric benefit.

    1. MGTOW to restore male self-care – reconstructive education and therapy.

    2. Teach Stoic Method, Masculine Aryan Virtues-Feminine Christian Values, Epicurean Means

    3. Restore voluntary association and disassociation in law.

    4. Restore men’s sport, military, trade, commercial, and civilc organizations.

    5. De-Financialize the economy, and end consumer interest, to restore working and middle class reproduction, and restore rates of reproduction.

    6. Restore the “church” under secular, traditional, christian-feminine, and pagan-masculine options instead of the academy-state as the central organ of education, family, and family finance, creating the most advanced system of family support ever existing in human history.

    7. Reform academy by limiting it to the teaching of courses in calculative and operationally constructible methods; cause all colleges and universities to warranty their services; cause all colleges and universities to carry any and all student debt – payable within six years; restore the division of grades 8+ to trades, clerical, managerial, professional, entrepreneurial, financial, and scientific specialization. And have children in education overlap ages in this classroom to compensate for different rates of development, or separate into classrooms again by degree of development that masks the fact that the principle difference between us is the tradeoff between rate of physical maturity and rate of leaning increasingly complex content.(and ending stigmas that wrongly stick thru life). Yes we are all in the end different in cognitive complexity we are not different in achievement within our degree of cognitive complexity. This is the issue. We can learn conscientiousness to some degree even if we cannot learn to learn complexity faster.

    8. Restore all production of commons to the sphere of influence and responsibility over the commons, but limiting the federal to it’s functions, state and city-state to its functions, county to its functions, locality to its functions, neighborhood to its functions, and family to its functions and individual to his functions.

    This will restore mutual consideration and care, the civic society only europeans developed, and the high trust civilization upon which all of our privileges both western and across all mankind derived.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 09:09:00 UTC

  • (dark humor) —“If we install P-Law, and truthful speech in public, Can I still

    (dark humor)

    —“If we install P-Law, and truthful speech in public, Can I still troll leftists?”– @MartianHoplite

    —“If you can find any left.”–CD


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 01:25:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189352705002823680

  • Yes, P-Arguments can make your head hurt. Sorry. that’s your neurons adapting to

    Yes, P-Arguments can make your head hurt. Sorry. that’s your neurons adapting to truthful speech after being saturated in pseudoscience, sophism, supernaturalism and lies for years. It’s good. Think of it as healing after surgery. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 01:23:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189352134577414151

  • HOW WILL P-LAW ON TRUTHFUL AND RECIPROCAL PUBLIC SPEECH AFFECT ME, AND OUR LIVES

    HOW WILL P-LAW ON TRUTHFUL AND RECIPROCAL PUBLIC SPEECH AFFECT ME, AND OUR LIVES?

    We’re decreasing tolerance for, and extending the liability for, the truthfulness and reciprocity we already… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=495553804374848&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 23:03:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189316798631567360

  • You should be kind to yourself, because this is the very edge of understanding,

    You should be kind to yourself, because this is the very edge of understanding, and while I’ve tried to make it accessible it is, as is the job of all philosophy, the reorganization of paradigms in response to evolution in knowledge and understanding – and its big.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 22:13:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189304364088909824

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189210205105672193


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189210205105672193

  • lol… it’s my version of precaution. It encourages the average overconfident im

    lol… it’s my version of precaution. It encourages the average overconfident impulsive confirmation bias seeking idiot from consuming my time, and intellectually honest people generally get the humor.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 22:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189302240709873668

    Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189300814734598144


    IN REPLY TO:

    @viralstrikeai

    @curtdoolittle “but don’t assume for a minute you understand” I do enjoy your humor.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189300814734598144