Theme: Truth

  • No I get the impression from the evidence that there are so many sects and so ma

    No I get the impression from the evidence that there are so many sects and so many interpretations, and so many justifications, that the claims of each group to ‘we are right’ is rather ridiculous – and demonstrates that anything open to that much interpretation is just sophism.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 19:21:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189985720884252679

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189985026441658370


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189985026441658370

  • Read Jefferson’s Bible. It’s a work of philosophy – which is all jesus did – wit

    Read Jefferson’s Bible. It’s a work of philosophy – which is all jesus did – without the woo woo magic to impress the ignorant. My ancestors wrote quite a bit, were lawyers, preachers, craftsment, and legislators, and their use of god was in deist form.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 18:32:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189973464410656768

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189972843330707456


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays They left the church out of it entirely, because they were trying to escape the parasitism and corruption of the church and the nobility, to create a middle class empirical commercial majority society. The ‘faithful’ are simply good workers for the project.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189972843330707456


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays They left the church out of it entirely, because they were trying to escape the parasitism and corruption of the church and the nobility, to create a middle class empirical commercial majority society. The ‘faithful’ are simply good workers for the project.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189972843330707456

  • One cannot force those of us who cannot believe to lie that we believe. One cann

    One cannot force those of us who cannot believe to lie that we believe. One cannot force those who believe not to. It matters only to believers whether we follow the natural law in for superstitious,… https://www.facebook.com/100017606988153/posts/496823167581245/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 16:48:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189947378847158276

  • NEW CONSTITUTION ENDS THE PROBLEM 1-OUTLAW false and ir-reciprocal speech, AND o

    NEW CONSTITUTION ENDS THE PROBLEM
    1-OUTLAW false and ir-reciprocal speech, AND outlaws suppression of truthful and reciprocal speech.
    2-REQUIRES all able bodied men bear arms
    3-REQUIRES defense of the physical, normative, and informational commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 15:06:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189921699703218177

  • YOU MISS THE POINT. ANTI-MATERIALISM IS A SOPHISM TO COVER FOR LYING. WE SEEK GA

    YOU MISS THE POINT. ANTI-MATERIALISM IS A SOPHISM TO COVER FOR LYING. WE SEEK GAINS AND TO PREVENT LOSSES.

    —“But I think you miss the mark somewhat here because heroism is fundamentally not about the material or Darwinian advantages.”—

    Heroism is a means of paying status and opportunity rather than material rewards, in exchange for directing dominance display to the production of commons. those commons may be physical, may be opportunities, may be, normative, may be informational or anything in between.

    So your mistake is failing to grasp that the use of ‘materialism’ as a criticism is an attempt to lie. instead, we seek gains whether material, opportunistic, or informational, and to prevent losses of the same. Because in all things we are simply an extension of the physical laws of the universe, with nothing other than the use of memory to choose optimum opportunities, rather than fae the limits of the physical world in seizing the first opportunity. it is by this vast accumulation of differences using different forms of memory that we capture and resist entropy while the reset of the universe decays.

    If I can get this thru: if you cannot convert an emotion to its underlying economic terms, then you are still talking superstition. It’s pseudoscientific superstition. But it’s superstition. In this example you are still thinking feelings have value, instead of that we evolved to experience positive and negative feelings for having increasing or decreasing assets, in physical (premium), opportunistic(discount), or informational (discount) form.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 13:39:00 UTC

  • NEW CONSTITUTION ENDS THE PROBLEM 1-OUTLAW false and ir-reciprocal speech, AND o

    NEW CONSTITUTION ENDS THE PROBLEM

    1-OUTLAW false and ir-reciprocal speech, AND outlaws suppression of truthful and reciprocal speech.

    2-REQUIRES all able bodied men bear arms

    3-REQUIRES defense of the physical, normative, and informational commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 11:06:00 UTC

  • Nothing I say sounds like postmodern philosophy because it’s all lying. Sounds l

    Nothing I say sounds like postmodern philosophy because it’s all lying. Sounds like = I don’t understand. Instead, tell me what you don’t understand.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 22:59:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189678305290674179

    Reply addressees: @thanos_pope

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189675453361147904


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189675453361147904

  • ONLY FALSEHOODS CREATE COMPLEXITIES (don’t get pissed at me for this. it’s true.

    ONLY FALSEHOODS CREATE COMPLEXITIES

    (don’t get pissed at me for this. it’s true. Truth isn’t always pleasant and the law isn’t always something people are willing to enforce.)

    —“The abortion topic is a paradox and a false equivalency for example. Too complex to boil down to a yes or no.”–Wade Rogers

    mmm… I just say it’s undecidable, not because it is complex, but because the only moral thing to be done is not commit the crime of fertility in the first place, creating the undecidable moral hazard.

    We don’t do the right thing because we don’t want to. But the right thing is to punish the mother. It cannot happen without her conspiracy.

    So that is the violation of natural law – period.

    But since we wont enforce it we convince our selves that abortion is complicated.

    No, all lies create complication. The truth is simple.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 22:39:00 UTC

  • “THE WHITE LAW” (LEX EUROPAE) (fully extended) Excellence, and Beauty, Heroism,

    “THE WHITE LAW” (LEX EUROPAE)
    (fully extended)

    Excellence, and Beauty,
    Heroism, and Duty
    Truth and Contract
    Reciprocity, and Sovereignty
    Compatibility and Hierarchy
    Natural Law and Jury… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496229957640566&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 22:30:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189670997198344192

  • THE REASON FOR TRUTHFUL PUBLIC SPEECH IS ECONOMICS OF LYING, AND THE ENEMY’S IND

    THE REASON FOR TRUTHFUL PUBLIC SPEECH IS ECONOMICS OF LYING, AND THE ENEMY’S INDUSTRIALIZATION OF IT

    by Jeff Levin

    —“A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes”—

    A lot of people on the right have a hard time letting go of classical liberalism and its tolerance for lying and parasitism.

    It’s already illegal for me to lie in the marketing of my business.

    Why shouldn’t politicians and public figures be held to the same standard???


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 18:30:00 UTC