Theme: Truth

  • Issue isn’t semantics, but of our specializations, and the market of cooperation

    Issue isn’t semantics, but of our specializations, and the market of cooperation. My work requires greater suppression of falsehood, most people’s requires greater seizure of opportunity (with hope of no-falsehood)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 14:55:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193180315264663554

    Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193179869884100613


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM And as in ANY MARKET, the velocity of transformation (‘prosperity’) is determined by the degree of expression of various wants in competition with the degree of suppression of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictions, fraud and deceit.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1193179869884100613


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM And as in ANY MARKET, the velocity of transformation (‘prosperity’) is determined by the degree of expression of various wants in competition with the degree of suppression of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictions, fraud and deceit.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1193179869884100613

  • PROSECUTION OF FALSEHOOD AND IRRECIPROCITY IS NOT HATE – IT’S JUSTICE. And suppr

    PROSECUTION OF FALSEHOOD AND IRRECIPROCITY IS NOT HATE – IT’S JUSTICE.

    And suppressing justice is conspiracy to commit a crime.

    We don’t hate. We do, I do Jurisprudence (law). And you gave an example of using the Abrahamic technique of undermining via pollution of the informational commons, rather than competing in the market under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty of care to the commons: lying.

    No more lies. No more excuses for Lies. The Abrahamic Dark Ages of Deceit;

    Whether:

    – Supernatural: Jewish/Christian/Muslim, or

    – Pseudoscientific: Marxist/Boasian/Freudian/Cantorian, or

    – Innumerate: Statistical/Economic/Financial/Consumer Credit.

    – Sophistry: Postmodern/Feminist/Identitarian,

    – Denial: Politically-Correct,

    With false promises of:

    – Individual, Gender, Class, Nation, Race, Species

    Equality of:

    – ability, potential, outcome, value to others;

    To Circumvent

    – Power-Law, Pareto-Capital, and Nash-Reward distributions;

    – The Necessity of market eugenics, and prevention of non-market dysgenics.

    With The False Promise of

    – Universalism, Globalism, Monotheism;

    Are Over.

    – The Century of Lies is Over.

    – Welcome to The World’s Renaissance.

    No More Lies

    Truth or False = Truth/falsehood, (meaningful)

    Innocence or Crime = Reciprocity/Harm-Theft-Fraud (meaningful)

    Love or Hate = Approval/Disapproval (meaningless)

    Any Argument to:

    – Approval or Disapproval,

    – Love or Hate,

    When the question is:

    – True or False, or

    – Innocence or Crime;

    Constitutes:

    – Conspiracy to commit:

    – Deceit or Crime:

    And Can Only Be Judged:

    – A Crime.

    Demanding;

    – Restitution;

    – Punishment;

    [fin]


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 14:17:00 UTC

  • I look for five things: 1. Comprehension (do you understand P?) 2. Construction

    I look for five things:

    1. Comprehension (do you understand P?)

    2. Construction (how well constructed is your argument)

    3. Precision (how parsimonious and balanced is it.)

    4. Innovation (have you added an insight – hard but happens)

    5. Poetics (is it aesthetically constructed)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 12:23:00 UTC

  • DISAMBIGUATION: MISTAKE VS ERROR —“Mistake(mistaken) vs. Error (err). Whats yo

    DISAMBIGUATION: MISTAKE VS ERROR

    —“Mistake(mistaken) vs. Error (err). Whats your distinction?”—Richard Hall

    ERROR: Errors in the construction of arguments that lead to erroneous conclusions (logic, operations)

    -vs-

    MISTAKE: Mistakes in articulation that do not lead to erroneous conclusions (explanation, example)

    I mean, I produce a lot of content, almost every day. So I make mistakes all the time. I make typos all the time, poor word choice, vocabulary mistakes, phrasing, or sentence structure, misquote, mis-remember, all sorts of things, and I tend to write in language that eliminates ‘optional’ words, and omg the list is endless. Those are mistakes.

    Errors would be the production of an argument that produced an irreciprocal or false conclusion.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 10:20:00 UTC

  • WHY DO WE LIVE IN DIFFERENT MENTAL EXPERIENCES? —“My working understanding of

    WHY DO WE LIVE IN DIFFERENT MENTAL EXPERIENCES?

    —“My working understanding of Truth is that which stands as a spiritual Reality, iterations of which show up in the manifest world as the vast array of imperfections with which we live in our daily lives.”—Marguerite McKenna @Nalo_Nei

    Spiritual combines (conflates) intuition and emotion.

    Human Cognitive Process:

    perceive stimuli

    … disambiguate,

    … … integrate(obj,space,scene),

    … … … auto-associate,

    … … … … auto-predict,

    … … … … … intuit relations,

    … … … … … … intuit valuations(emotion),

    … … … … … … … devote attention,

    … … … … … … … … Imagine(predict,model)

    … … … … … … … … … reason(permute),

    … … … … … … … … … … calculation(plan),

    … … … … … … … … … … … computation.

    Male bias Think / Female bias Feel.

    That’s what the brain does. Period. And all of us ‘live in’ some dominant experience between variation of the auto associative free-associative, imaginary-emotional(Aesthetic), and the (like me) completely Predictive-Analytical(Decidable). Division of labor cognitive so to speak.

    —“And which part is observing the interplay you speak of?”—Can’t Stump the Trump @DeplorableDJDJ

    Well, the question is, where do each of us specialize in performing auto association, prediction, valuation, focus, planning, and action? In other words, are we practicing consumption, exchange or production?

    Dorsal Sequence (hierarchy) of Labor:

    … Sensory, S-M,

    … … Motor(physical), M-E,

    … … … Executive, E-S,

    … … … … Social, S-F,

    … … … … … Focus, P-F,

    … … … … … … Plan,

    … … … … … … … Release Action

    … … … … … … … … > Recurse.

    Lateral: Prey(Perception-integration) vs Predator (Action-analysis).

    Diff Auto-Association

    … ->Diff in Prediction(imagination)

    … … -> Diff in Activity(value detection)

    … … … ->Diff in Attention

    … … … … -> Subjective(experience, conflate)

    … … … … vs

    … … … … -> Executive (Plan Act Recuse Disambiguate).

    Female and Male cognitive stereotypes (as always) are correct at the general and at the extreme. However, w/ heavily overlapping, so we find a few males with female cog bias, and opposite.

    And no it’s not a social construction.

    (a) brain structures vary (sometimes greatly) by gender

    (b) brain functions vary (sometimes greatly) by gender

    (c) in utero development failure produces ‘failures’.

    (d) early development, social development, trauma produce ‘failures’.

    So all of us can experience some or all of the spectrum but some of us bias the degree of agency (submission-experience(imagination)) vs (dominance-action) according one way or the other. As in all things we are very good at single dimension comprehension, and bad at multi.

    So for simple reduction:

    TABLE OF DIMENSIONS

    1.Self ………………………vs Others ….vs World;

    2.Sensory(aesthetes) .vs Empathy .vs Motor(athletes);

    3.Internal(experience) vs Others ….vs External(action);

    4.Consumption(Recreation,Submission)

    ……………………………..vs.Trade (Interaction, collaboration)

    ……………………………………………vs Production (Agency, Dominance);

    5.Short Term …………..vs Medium ..vs Long Term.

    In other words, we’re not only different, we evolved to specialize in collecting information across reproductive, productive, knowledge, and perception spectrums and cooperating and communicating to produce a market the equilibrium serving all Power, Pareto and Nash distributions.

    This means we not only parallel process vast amounts of information internally, but collectively through display word and deed.

    And as in ANY MARKET, the velocity of transformation (‘prosperity’) is determined by the degree of expression of various wants in competition with the degree of suppression of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictions, fraud and deceit.

    The Issue (Different Grammars of Expression) isn’t ‘just semantics’, but of our specializations, and the market of cooperation. My work requires greater suppression of falsehood, most people’s requires greater seizure of opportunity (with hope of no-falsehood)

    Because increases in precision placing increased burden on executive function, are cognitively and informational expensive.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 10:04:00 UTC

  • Only if you say something both false and irreciprocal. 😉

    Only if you say something both false and irreciprocal. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 04:04:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193016604906442753

    Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193014515341897728


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193014515341897728

  • OK. Well, maybe we can do a youtube thing and entertain the folks. But in the en

    OK. Well, maybe we can do a youtube thing and entertain the folks. But in the end it’ll come down to: I have to create measurements to prohibit lying, and you want (justifiably) the most efficient means of understanding and communicating. I just need a sharper knife for my work.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 03:41:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193010643726716928

    Reply addressees: @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192994058269937664


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Nalo_Nei

    @curtdoolittle @FreePeterBiarM Um, well you know, that’s not a legitimate counter-argument right? You ‘just aren’t disambiguating’ (would love a full and contextual definition of that when you get the chance) my statements (reality) from your own complicit drive to counter them (verb) ;>

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192994058269937664

  • Only European Peoples invented Truth before face; Truth regardless of cost to th

    Only European Peoples invented Truth before face; Truth regardless of cost to the dominance hierarchy; Rule of Law by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Testimony and Jury; Resulting in Markets in Every aspect of Life: Continuous Adaptation – Faster Than The Rest.
    #Trump @realDonaldTrump https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1192923488471986176

  • Um, well you know, that can’t be true right? We have to invent speech. You just

    Um, well you know, that can’t be true right? We have to invent speech. You just aren’t disambiguating the noun(reality) from the verb (truth)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 21:46:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192921457384476672

    Reply addressees: @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192920027764273158


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Nalo_Nei

    @curtdoolittle @FreePeterBiarM I maintain Humans do not ‘invent’ Truth. We can invent lies and call them ‘truth’, but that’s an expression of human error—then we have created nothing but own confusion, not Truth.

    We have created ways to understand and perceive Truth, but we don’t create Truth itself

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192920027764273158

  • So where you want to understand, i want to prevent lying – lying on the industri

    So where you want to understand, i want to prevent lying – lying on the industrialized scale that was invented in the 20th century and used against our people every single day.

    Hence, my work with and concern for precision: the prevention of deceit. -cheers 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 21:11:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192912606853500928

    Reply addressees: @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192912254985015297


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM Meaning is one thing(contract for reconstruction of experience) warranty another (limiting errors from transferred meaning), negotiation, argument(persuasion), and deceit (disinformation). Most of philosophy takes place in presumption of positives. I do law. I presume negatives.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192912254985015297


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM Meaning is one thing(contract for reconstruction of experience) warranty another (limiting errors from transferred meaning), negotiation, argument(persuasion), and deceit (disinformation). Most of philosophy takes place in presumption of positives. I do law. I presume negatives.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192912254985015297