Theme: Truth

  • SIX REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT 1. The search for justification(proof

    SIX REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
    1. The search for justification(proof) rather than falsification(survival).
    2. The search for inconsistent utilities (paradigms) rather than a hierarchy of consistent first principles (universal paradigm).
    3. The search for the ideal person, behavior, wants, means, and ends, rather than means of cooperation between male and female opposites.
    4. The search for positive law of thou shall, limiting possibilities, vs negative laws of though shall-not, leaving open infinite possibilities.
    5. The search for the good instead of the true, from which we choose possible goods.
    6. The search for political uniformity as a static optimum rather than competing diversities as an evolutionary optimum – the search for predictable certainty rather than evolutionary and adaptive uncertainty.

    Every one of these falsehoods is hostile to the first principle of the universe: evolutionary computation, and our condition in the capture and transformation of energy per person, yielding us the greatest prosperity with which to make the greatest range of choices that will as a consequence, repeat the cycle, of evolutionary computation, and the improvement of our condition by increasing the capture and transformation of energy.

    “NO MORE ERRORS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 18:02:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638602036370456576

  • SIX REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT 1. The search for justification(proof

    SIX REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
    1. The search for justification(proof) rather than falsification(survival).
    2. The search for inconsistent utilities (paradigms) rather than a hierarchy of consistent first principles (universal paradigm).
    3. The search for the ideal person, behavior, wants, means, and ends, rather than means of cooperation between male and female opposites.
    4. The search for positive law of thou shall, limiting possibilities, vs negative laws of though shall-not, leaving open infinite possibilities.
    5. The search for the good instead of the true, from which we choose possible goods.
    6. The search for political uniformity as a static optimum rather than competing diversities as an evolutionary optimum – the search for predictable certainty rather than evolutionary and adaptive uncertainty.

    Every one of these falsehoods is hostile to the first principle of the universe: evolutionary computation, and our condition in the capture and transformation of energy per person, yielding us the greatest prosperity with which to make the greatest range of choices that will as a consequence, repeat the cycle, of evolutionary computation, and the improvement of our condition by increasing the capture and transformation of energy.

    “NO MORE ERRORS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 18:02:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638602036215160840

  • Are you lying and denying the substantial differences between races, and the ten

    Are you lying and denying the substantial differences between races, and the tendency of all groups to demonstrate kin preference and kin selection, and that the difference between the races is largely in class size, and class distribution determines demand for norms, traditions, values and institutions?

    Or are you just racist and culturist against western civilization and covering it with pretense of moral virtue by lying about sex class ethnicity and race differences?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 16:50:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638583879962435588

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638582202735656960

  • Are you lying and denying the substantial differences between races, and the ten

    Are you lying and denying the substantial differences between races, and the tendency of all groups to demonstrate kin preference and kin selection, and that the difference between the races is largely in class size, and class distribution determines demand for norms, traditions, values and institutions?

    Or are you just racist and culturist against western civilization and covering it with pretense of moral virtue by lying about sex class ethnicity and race differences?

    Reply addressees: @enigma3078


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 16:50:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638583879857590273

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638582202735656960

  • Why do you feel knowledgeable enough to make those statements? When I can, witho

    Why do you feel knowledgeable enough to make those statements? When I can, without any effort at all, call in the other people who are as equally or more knowledgeable than I am, who work with the data itself, and will disagree with you. Genetics are the most deterministic property of all human behavior. Some of the correlations are minor variations, but some are not. In particular we can measure the differences between sexes, classes, ethnicities, and races. And in large part the differences in ethnicities. and races is due to variation in neotenic development, sexual dimorphism, and class size. And then class traits and class size cause demand for normative, traditional, and institutional differences. And these are then moderated by state of development, competitors, resources, climate, and geography. But of these differences, even minor variations in the distribution and amplitude of Neoteny, IQ and Personality are disproportionately influential.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 16:43:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638582184922476544

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638580086239555585

  • Why do you feel knowledgeable enough to make those statements? When I can, witho

    Why do you feel knowledgeable enough to make those statements? When I can, without any effort at all, call in the other people who are as equally or more knowledgeable than I am, who work with the data itself, and will disagree with you. Genetics are the most deterministic property of all human behavior. Some of the correlations are minor variations, but some are not. In particular we can measure the differences between sexes, classes, ethnicities, and races. And in large part the differences in ethnicities. and races is due to variation in neotenic development, sexual dimorphism, and class size. And then class traits and class size cause demand for normative, traditional, and institutional differences. And these are then moderated by state of development, competitors, resources, climate, and geography. But of these differences, even minor variations in the distribution and amplitude of Neoteny, IQ and Personality are disproportionately influential.

    Reply addressees: @enigma3078


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 16:43:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638582184788336666

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638580086239555585

  • RT @NoahRevoy: If the truth makes you uncomfortable, good. That means it’s doing

    RT @NoahRevoy: If the truth makes you uncomfortable, good. That means it’s doing its job.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 23:15:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638318443119230977

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: @1776Sic @TheAutistocrat @curtdoolittle (been trying to give a

    RT @ThruTheHayes: @1776Sic @TheAutistocrat @curtdoolittle (been trying to give away the secret the whole time; just don’t think false thing…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 20:40:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638279552181981197

  • Someone asked me to look into your argument because a block of conservatives are

    Someone asked me to look into your argument because a block of conservatives are aware I will tell them the truth regarding scientific claims. I have looked into your argument and posting history. Yes you have a hypothesis. It is only a hypothesis. This hypothesis requires the presumption that penetrating the lung wall is necessary to reach the infectable cells and interfere with viral insertion and replication. As far as I know that’s not true, but I can’t testify to it. Other than that I don’t see any falsification of the various vaccines. And I’m still surprised at the claims we don’t grasp viruses or their mechanisms of infection and replication. If you can add additional research that might be helpful. But at present I’m concerned about side effects and the fact that the state mandated a therapy (not a vaccine) that hadn’t sufficient testing to warranty againt side effects, when the threat of the virus was simply not that severe unless you were in a vulnerable demographic.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 03:47:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638024491417714688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638018805388701696

  • Someone asked me to look into your argument because a block of conservatives are

    Someone asked me to look into your argument because a block of conservatives are aware I will tell them the truth regarding scientific claims. I have looked into your argument and posting history. Yes you have a hypothesis. It is only a hypothesis. This hypothesis requires the presumption that penetrating the lung wall is necessary to reach the infectable cells and interfere with viral insertion and replication. As far as I know that’s not true, but I can’t testify to it. Other than that I don’t see any falsification of the various vaccines. And I’m still surprised at the claims we don’t grasp viruses or their mechanisms of infection and replication. If you can add additional research that might be helpful. But at present I’m concerned about side effects and the fact that the state mandated a therapy (not a vaccine) that hadn’t sufficient testing to warranty againt side effects, when the threat of the virus was simply not that severe unless you were in a vulnerable demographic.

    Reply addressees: @leelasik @AmerLibertyTree


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 03:47:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638024491245682688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638018805388701696