Someone asked me to look into your argument because a block of conservatives are

Someone asked me to look into your argument because a block of conservatives are aware I will tell them the truth regarding scientific claims. I have looked into your argument and posting history. Yes you have a hypothesis. It is only a hypothesis. This hypothesis requires the presumption that penetrating the lung wall is necessary to reach the infectable cells and interfere with viral insertion and replication. As far as I know that’s not true, but I can’t testify to it. Other than that I don’t see any falsification of the various vaccines. And I’m still surprised at the claims we don’t grasp viruses or their mechanisms of infection and replication. If you can add additional research that might be helpful. But at present I’m concerned about side effects and the fact that the state mandated a therapy (not a vaccine) that hadn’t sufficient testing to warranty againt side effects, when the threat of the virus was simply not that severe unless you were in a vulnerable demographic.

Reply addressees: @leelasik @AmerLibertyTree