–“James: Woke is critical consciousness. Audience: That’s too hard. Dumb it down.”–
I’ll dumb it down further for James’ audience:
Q: DEFINE SCIENTIFICALLY “critical constructivist epistemology, ethics, and activism.”
SUMMARY: “Feminine Undermining that you see every single… https://t.co/zDIM1RCQ2d
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 19:49:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640078455701135363
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637487849472761856
“Q: WHY WAS THERE, IS THERE, NO AGREEMENT ON ‘BEING LIBERTARIAN’”
(As usual, the truth, and you won’t like it. Because you’re not a libertarian because you’re a good person. But because you’re just a lesser kind of bad person.) https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1640068867497009155
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 19:12:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640069304665161730
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1640068867497009155
RT @NoahRevoy: @curtdoolittle Given enough time all honest men come to about the same general set of conclusions.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 01:10:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639796829888946176
ARE YOU FIT TO HAVE AN OPINION?
Having spent since the early 90’s on solving the problem of modernity that’s currently peaking in peak-woke and the coming civil war to decide that conflict, I’ve had to come to terms with the fact that there are those of us who can face these crises with love, humor, and hard work, for the common good, and those who do it with hate, anger, whining, and tantrums because they want that solution their way. I just can’t work with all that negative emotion and sperging and whining. If we know how to solve the problem for the benefit of most if not all, then Victory is simple. Just show up. All the whining is just wanting others to show up for you – cause you’re unworthy and unfit to do so. And so unworthy and unfit for an opinion.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 14:05:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638904837763997696
ARE YOU FIT TO HAVE AN OPINION?
Having spent since the early 90’s on solving the problem of modernity that’s currently peaking in peak-woke and the coming civil war to decide that conflict, I’ve had to come to terms with the fact that there are those of us who can face these crises with love, humor, and hard work, for the common good, and those who do it with hate, anger, whining, and tantrums because they want that solution their way. I just can’t work with all that negative emotion and sperging and whining. If we know how to solve the problem for the benefit of most if not all, then Victory is simple. Just show up. All the whining is just wanting others to show up for you – cause you’re unworthy and unfit to do so. And so unworthy and unfit for an opinion.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 14:05:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638904837646557184
RE: –“not understanding 1, 2, 3.”–
RE: SIX/TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1638602036370456576
1) a) all logic is falsificationary: proofs test survival. b) we learn about the universe through incremental removal of human error. c) All human error originates…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 13:55:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638902273161003008
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638602036370456576
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1638602036370456576
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
SIX REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
1. The search for justification(proof) rather than falsification(survival).
2. The search for inconsistent utilities (paradigms) rather than a hierarchy of consistent first principles (universal paradigm).
3. The search for the ideal person, behavior, wants, means, and ends, rather than means of cooperation between male and female opposites.
4. The search for positive law of thou shall, limiting possibilities, vs negative laws of though shall-not, leaving open infinite possibilities.
5. The search for the good instead of the true, from which we choose possible goods.
6. The search for political uniformity as a static optimum rather than competing diversities as an evolutionary optimum – the search for predictable certainty rather than evolutionary and adaptive uncertainty.
Every one of these falsehoods is hostile to the first principle of the universe: evolutionary computation, and our condition in the capture and transformation of energy per person, yielding us the greatest prosperity with which to make the greatest range of choices that will as a consequence, repeat the cycle, of evolutionary computation, and the improvement of our condition by increasing the capture and transformation of energy.
“NO MORE ERRORS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES”
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1638602036370456576
RE: –“not understanding 1, 2, 3.”–
RE: SIX/TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
https://t.co/abAcaXY3jF
1) a) all logic is falsificationary: proofs test survival. b) we learn about the universe through incremental removal of human error. c) All human error originates with the the consequences of embodiment, anthropomorphism, and the problem of mathiness (ideal) vs computation (real).
2) There is one law to the universe and using constructive proofs (falsification of all alternatives), by this one law (evolutionary computation), we can test for deviations from this rule, that allows us to create universally commensurability as a single science (unification of the sciences) rather than the crisis of today, which is specialization in those deviations from universal commensurability – ie: why physics, cog sci, psychy, soc, econ, fail. (Note that as an example, we don’t think of geometry, which is reducible to the laws of the triangle, as a constructive logic of falsification, but it is and it is consistent with the ternary logicl of evolutionary computation.)
3) All human behavior originates in sex differences. Most of human history consists of solving political (male) questions in the public sphere while reserving familial and interpersonal (female) questions to the private sphere. As such cog sci, psych, soc, econ, pol are based on the false premise of variation from the male mean. However, with the introgression of women, we have admized female cognitive and male biases without a means of creating a market for the resolutoin of conflicts between the opposites of female in time empathizing, vs male over time systematizing. As such the purpose of all behavioral sciences is not gender neutrality, or gender priority, but gender EXCHANGE. This is a huge leap in moral thought from golden mean to behavioral supply and demand between polar opposites. And where the opposites and the spectrum between them create a field of evolutionary computation across time and space that maxmizes human innovation cooperation and trade, maximizing human evolution. Where seeking the ideal person like any other ‘false aggregate’ will result in stagnation and decline – which is the lesson of both abrahamic-series religions and marxist-series ideologies.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 13:55:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638902272963870722
TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
(V2. Added Four.)
1. The search for ideal truth rather than incrementally testifiable (performative) truth. (Failing to grasp truth in general).
2. The search for justification(proof) rather than falsification(survival).
3. The failure to distinquish between the reducibility of laws to math (before, physical, statistics), computation (during, behavioral, operations, operationalism) and simulation (after, evolutionary, survivals, supply-demand, economics), and the spectrum of rules of disambiguation (grammars, paradigms) we use to describe them. (In general the problem of ‘mathiness’, especially in physics.)
4. The search for inconsistent utilities (paradigms) rather than a hierarchy of consistent first principles (universal paradigm), by the first principle of evolutionary computation.
5. The search for the ideal person, behavior, wants, means, and ends, rather than means of cooperation between male and female opposites.
6. The search for the good instead of the true, not-false, possible, and not-irreciprocal, from which we choose possible recirpocal goods.
7. The search for positive law of thou-shall, limiting possibilities, vs negative laws of thou-shall-not, leaving open infinite possibilities.
8. The search for political uniformity as a static optimum rather than competing diversities as an evolutionary optimum – the search for predictable certainty rather than evolutionary and adaptive uncertainty.
9. The search for a static political model rather than an adaptive political model for conditions of war, vs going concern, vs windfalls, and how to transition between them as needed.
10. The search for a single uniform economy rather than a hierarchy of economies suiting the capacity of rsponsibilty of individuals and groups.
Every one of these falsehoods is hostile to the first principle of the universe: evolutionary computation, and our condition in the capture and transformation of energy per person, yielding us the greatest prosperity with which to make the greatest range of choices that will as a consequence, repeat the cycle, of evolutionary computation, and the improvement of our condition by increasing the capture and transformation of energy.
“NO MORE ERRORS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES”
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 22:06:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638663444068028417
TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
(V2. Added Four.)
1. The search for ideal truth rather than incrementally testifiable (performative) truth. (Failing to grasp truth in general).
2. The search for justification(proof) rather than falsification(survival).
3. The failure to distinquish between the reducibility of laws to math (before, physical, statistics), computation (during, behavioral, operations, operationalism) and simulation (after, evolutionary, survivals, supply-demand, economics), and the spectrum of rules of disambiguation (grammars, paradigms) we use to describe them. (In general the problem of ‘mathiness’, especially in physics.)
4. The search for inconsistent utilities (paradigms) rather than a hierarchy of consistent first principles (universal paradigm), by the first principle of evolutionary computation.
5. The search for the ideal person, behavior, wants, means, and ends, rather than means of cooperation between male and female opposites.
6. The search for the good instead of the true, not-false, possible, and not-irreciprocal, from which we choose possible recirpocal goods.
7. The search for positive law of thou-shall, limiting possibilities, vs negative laws of thou-shall-not, leaving open infinite possibilities.
8. The search for political uniformity as a static optimum rather than competing diversities as an evolutionary optimum – the search for predictable certainty rather than evolutionary and adaptive uncertainty.
9. The search for a static political model rather than an adaptive political model for conditions of war, vs going concern, vs windfalls, and how to transition between them as needed.
10. The search for a single uniform economy rather than a hierarchy of economies suiting the capacity of rsponsibilty of individuals and groups.
Every one of these falsehoods is hostile to the first principle of the universe: evolutionary computation, and our condition in the capture and transformation of energy per person, yielding us the greatest prosperity with which to make the greatest range of choices that will as a consequence, repeat the cycle, of evolutionary computation, and the improvement of our condition by increasing the capture and transformation of energy.
“NO MORE ERRORS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES”
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 22:06:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638663443858202624
RT @curtdoolittle: Mankind faces the end of mystery limiting us to the merely unknown. And with that end of mystery comes the necessity of…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 19:21:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638621928893063200